From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, "Goel,
Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/i915: Pin the ifbdev for the info->system_base GGTT mmapping
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:52:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151216105217.GE30437@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151206203320.GA29029@wunner.de>
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:33:20PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:05:26PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > A long time ago (before 3.14) we relied on a permanent pinning of the
> > ifbdev to lock the fb in place inside the GGTT. However, the
> > introduction of stealing the BIOS framebuffer and reusing its address in
> > the GGTT for the fbdev has muddied waters and we use an inherited fb.
> > However, the inherited fb is only pinned whilst it is active and we no
> > longer have an explicit pin for the info->system_base mmapping used by
> > the fbdev. The result is that after some aperture pressure the fbdev may
> > be evicted, but we continue to write the fbcon into the same GGTT
> > address - overwriting anything else that may be put into that offset.
> > The effect is most pronounced across suspend/resume as
> > intel_fbdev_set_suspend() does a full clear over the whole scanout.
> >
> > v2: Only unpin the intel_fb is we allocate it. If we inherit the fb from
> > the BIOS, we do not own the pinned vma (except for the reference we add
> > in this patch for our access via info->screen_base).
> >
> > v3: Finish balancing the vma pinning for the normal !preallocated case.
> >
> > v4: Try to simplify the pinning even further.
> > v5: Leak the VMA (cleaned up by object-free) to avoid complicated error paths.
>
> It's beautiful how little code is needed to fix this. The only remaining
> thing I noticed now while looking over the error paths is that these
> lines in intelfb_alloc() become obsolete with your patch:
>
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fb))
> - drm_framebuffer_unreference(fb);
> return ret;
> }
>
> Because at each of the remaining "goto out" in the function,
> fb can be only either an ERR_PTR or NULL.
>
> Also, further up in the function, the declaration of fb can then be
> changed thus:
>
> - struct drm_framebuffer *fb = NULL;
> + struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
>
> Kind regards,
Yeah there's room for follow-up polish, but this seems good enough at
least for -fixes.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Lukas, feel like supplying a patch to apply the polish you've spotted on
top?
Thanks, Daniel
>
> Lukas
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> > Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > index 7ccde58f8c98..bea75cafc623 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
> > @@ -163,13 +163,6 @@ static int intelfb_alloc(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Flush everything out, we'll be doing GTT only from now on */
> > - ret = intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(NULL, fb, NULL);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("failed to pin obj: %d\n", ret);
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > -
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > ifbdev->fb = to_intel_framebuffer(fb);
> > @@ -225,6 +218,14 @@ static int intelfb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >
> > + /* Pin the GGTT vma for our access via info->screen_base.
> > + * This also validates that any existing fb inherited from the
> > + * BIOS is suitable for own access.
> > + */
> > + ret = intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(NULL, &ifbdev->fb->base, NULL);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > info = drm_fb_helper_alloc_fbi(helper);
> > if (IS_ERR(info)) {
> > DRM_ERROR("Failed to allocate fb_info\n");
> > @@ -287,6 +288,7 @@ out_destroy_fbi:
> > drm_fb_helper_release_fbi(helper);
> > out_unpin:
> > i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin(obj);
> > +out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > @@ -524,6 +526,10 @@ static const struct drm_fb_helper_funcs intel_fb_helper_funcs = {
> > static void intel_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev)
> > {
> > + /* We rely on the object-free to release the VMA pinning for
> > + * the info->screen_base mmaping. Leaking the VMA is simpler than
> > + * trying to rectify all the possible error paths leading here.
> > + */
> >
> > drm_fb_helper_unregister_fbi(&ifbdev->helper);
> > drm_fb_helper_release_fbi(&ifbdev->helper);
> > --
> > 2.6.2
> >
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 14:16 [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Set the map-and-fenceable flag for preallocated objects Chris Wilson
2015-11-20 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Pin the ifbdev for the info->system_base GGTT mmapping Chris Wilson
2015-11-20 14:34 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2015-11-20 16:15 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-11-20 16:29 ` [PATCH v4] " Chris Wilson
2015-11-20 16:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-11-20 16:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2015-11-20 18:01 ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-24 16:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-01 9:01 ` Jani Nikula
2015-11-24 21:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-12-04 16:05 ` [PATCH v5] " Chris Wilson
2015-12-06 20:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-12-16 10:52 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-12-17 11:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-10 16:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-10 16:41 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-12-17 15:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-12-23 11:07 ` Jani Nikula
2015-11-20 16:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Set the map-and-fenceable flag for preallocated objects Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151216105217.GE30437@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=akash.goel@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox