From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Subject: Re: Regression in v4.5-rc1, bisected to commit 39bfcd5235e0
 ("drm/i915: more virtual south bridge detection")
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:49:18 -0600
Message-ID: <20160125154918.GA6901@wolff.to>
References: <87y4bes74m.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87y4bes74m.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:52:25 +0100,
  Bj=F8rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>my oldish Thinkpad X301 only wanted to show a blank screen in v4.5-rc1=
=2E
>Bisecting resulted in:
>
>    drm/i915: more virtual south bridge detection

I am likely seeing the same problem on a Dell laptop. I haven't finishe=
d=20
my bisect yet, but the above commit is still in the list of 605 possibl=
e=20
problem commits.

I'll test reverting that commit tonight and see if that fixes my proble=
m.