intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drm: introduce color correction properties
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:02:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160127090244.GB13107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPj87rOkMTW-oO4Sp+PXsycqA=zYKMvXE-dGwm_BMPn5Et8vow@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:57:51AM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 22 January 2016 at 21:20, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> > Probably should have noticed/commented on this on your previous
> > iteration, but should we also restrict these new properties to be
> > atomic-only?  I thought there was a consensus a while back that new
> > functionality would only be exposed for atomic-ready userspace.  That
> > would mean also adding DRM_MODE_PROP_ATOMIC to your flags at creation.
> > Sorry for not noticing this when I commented before!
> 
> I don't really see a reason to mandate atomic for these. They'll still
> work with normal prop sets, every bit as well/badly as pre-atomic has
> always worked.
> 

Yeah, I agree that these could still work for legacy.  But I thought the
goal was to make new common properties atomic-only to help push atomic
as the API of the future and also to reduce the possibility of new
kernel properties confusing any poorly-written existing userspace.

I thought danvet had written something about that a while back, but I
could be completely misremembering.  If the consensus is that exposing
these for non-atomic is okay, then I don't have any serious objections
to that.

Thanks.


Matt

> Cheers,
> Daniel

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-27  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-22 12:12 [PATCH 0/6] Pipe level color management V2 Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Extract out gamma table and CSC to their own file Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm: introduce color correction properties Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 21:20   ` Matt Roper
2016-01-25 10:57     ` Daniel Stone
2016-01-27  9:02       ` Matt Roper [this message]
2016-01-22 12:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: enable CSC for pipe C Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 12:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: enable legacy palette " Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 12:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Implement color management on bdw/skl/bxt/kbl Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 12:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Implement color management on chv Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-22 13:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Pipe level color management (rev2) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-09 12:19 [PATCH 0/6] Pipe level color management V4 Lionel Landwerlin
2016-02-09 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm: introduce color correction properties Lionel Landwerlin
2016-02-18  1:55   ` Matt Roper
2016-02-01 15:18 [PATCH 0/6] Pipe level color management V3 Lionel Landwerlin
2016-02-01 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm: introduce color correction properties Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-21 15:03 [PATCH 0/6] Pipe level color management Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-21 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm: introduce color correction properties Lionel Landwerlin
2016-01-21 19:20   ` Matt Roper
2016-01-22 10:20     ` Lionel Landwerlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160127090244.GB13107@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).