From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915/dsi: add support for gpio elements on CHV
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:16:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407131618.GJ4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20f475c68caf844335602be40246d018d9851f5b.1459884518.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:30:53PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Add support for CHV gpio programming in DSI gpio elements.
>
> v2: Overhaul macros according to Ville's review.
>
> [Rewritten by Jani, based on earlier work by Yogesh and Deepak.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Mohan Marimuthu <yogesh.mohan.marimuthu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> index 98583f37f5c7..5e2c31d9a748 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,24 @@ static struct gpio_map vlv_gpio_table[] = {
> { .port = IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC, .base_offset = VLV_GPIO_NC_11_PANEL1_BKLTCTL },
> };
>
> +#define CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_N 0
> +#define CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SE 73
> +#define CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW 100
> +#define CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E 198
Hmm. These don't actually match the "spec" we got. In the docs E is
73-99 and SE 198-255.
Actually the spec is inconsistent with itself since it claims
198-255 map to SE 0-56. Either it should be 198-254 or 0-57.
> +
> +#define CHV_VBT_MAX_PINS_PER_FMLY 15
> +
> +#define CHV_GPIO_PAD_CFG0(f, i) (0x4400 + (f) * 0x400 + (i) * 8)
The bit defines should be here, except for CFGLOCK which is for CFG1.
> +#define CHV_GPIO_PAD_CFG1(f, i) (0x4400 + (f) * 0x400 + (i) * 8 + 4)
> +
> +#define CHV_GPIO_CFGLOCK (1 << 31)
> +#define CHV_GPIO_GPIOEN (1 << 15)
> +#define CHV_GPIO_GPIOCFG_GPIO (0 << 8)
> +#define CHV_GPIO_GPIOCFG_GPO (1 << 8)
> +#define CHV_GPIO_GPIOCFG_GPI (2 << 8)
> +#define CHV_GPIO_GPIOCFG_HIZ (3 << 8)
> +#define CHV_GPIO_GPIOTXSTATE(state) ((!!(state)) << 1)
> +
> static inline enum port intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(u8 port)
> {
> return port ? PORT_C : PORT_A;
> @@ -233,6 +251,50 @@ static void vlv_exec_gpio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> }
>
> +static void chv_exec_gpio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + u8 gpio_source, u8 gpio_index, bool value)
> +{
> + u16 cfg0, cfg1;
> + u16 family_num;
> + u8 port;
> +
> + if (dev_priv->vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 3) {
> + if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E) {
> + gpio_index -= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E;
> + port = CHV_IOSF_PORT_GPIO_E;
> + } else if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW) {
> + gpio_index -= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW;
> + port = CHV_IOSF_PORT_GPIO_SW;
> + } else if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SE) {
> + gpio_index -= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SE;
> + port = CHV_IOSF_PORT_GPIO_SE;
> + } else {
> + port = CHV_IOSF_PORT_GPIO_N;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (gpio_source == 0) {
> + port = IOSF_PORT_GPIO_NC;
> + } else if (gpio_source == 1) {
> + port = IOSF_PORT_GPIO_SC;
> + } else {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unknown gpio source %u\n", gpio_source);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + family_num = gpio_index / CHV_VBT_MAX_PINS_PER_FMLY;
> + gpio_index = gpio_index % CHV_VBT_MAX_PINS_PER_FMLY;
> +
> + cfg0 = CHV_GPIO_PAD_CFG0(family_num, gpio_index);
> + cfg1 = CHV_GPIO_PAD_CFG1(family_num, gpio_index);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> + vlv_iosf_sb_write(dev_priv, port, cfg0, 0);
> + vlv_iosf_sb_write(dev_priv, port, cfg1,
> + CHV_GPIO_GPIOCFG_HIZ | CHV_GPIO_GPIOTXSTATE(value));
We want GPO, not HIZ. Also cfg0 and cfg1 got swapped around.
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> +}
> +
> static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
> @@ -256,6 +318,8 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
>
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
> vlv_exec_gpio(dev_priv, gpio_source, gpio_index, value);
> + else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> + chv_exec_gpio(dev_priv, gpio_source, gpio_index, value);
> else
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("GPIO element not supported on this platform\n");
>
> --
> 2.1.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 19:30 [PATCH v3 0/6] drm/i915/dsi: improved gpio element support for vlv/chv/bxt Jani Nikula
2016-04-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915/dsi: clean up vlv gpio table and definitions Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 12:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915/dsi: abstract VLV gpio element execution to a separate function Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 13:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915/dsi: use a temp variable for referencing the gpio table Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 13:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-07 13:39 ` Jani Nikula
2016-04-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/i915/dsi: add support for sequence block v3 gpio for VLV Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 13:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-07 13:14 ` Jani Nikula
2016-04-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/i915/dsi: add support for gpio elements on CHV Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 13:16 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-04-05 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/bxt: add bxt dsi gpio element support Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 11:47 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2016-04-07 12:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-07 12:55 ` Jani Nikula
2016-04-06 7:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dsi: improved gpio element support for vlv/chv/bxt (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407131618.GJ4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).