public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done during gpu reset, v2.
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:33:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425163339.GE4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460355814-3599-2-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:23:34AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Add force_reset_modeset_test as a parameter to force the modeset path during gpu reset.
> This allows a IGT test to set the knob and trigger a hang to force the gpu reset,
> even on platforms that wouldn't otherwise require it.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Split out fix to separate commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Testcase: drv_hangman.reset-with-forced-modeset
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c   |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index 1779f02e6df8..80ce581793dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct i915_params i915 __read_mostly = {
>  	.fastboot = 0,
>  	.prefault_disable = 0,
>  	.load_detect_test = 0,
> +	.force_reset_modeset_test = 0,
>  	.reset = true,
>  	.invert_brightness = 0,
>  	.disable_display = 0,
> @@ -158,6 +159,11 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(load_detect_test,
>  	"Force-enable the VGA load detect code for testing (default:false). "
>  	"For developers only.");
>  
> +module_param_named_unsafe(force_reset_modeset_test, i915.force_reset_modeset_test, bool, 0600);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_reset_modeset_test,
> +	"Force a modeset during gpu reset for testing (default:false). "
> +	"For developers only.");
> +
>  module_param_named_unsafe(invert_brightness, i915.invert_brightness, int, 0600);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(invert_brightness,
>  	"Invert backlight brightness "
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> index 02bc27804291..3934c4300427 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct i915_params {
>  	bool fastboot;
>  	bool prefault_disable;
>  	bool load_detect_test;
> +	bool force_reset_modeset_test;
>  	bool reset;
>  	bool disable_display;
>  	bool enable_guc_submission;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 2f76efc86417..faf2da08778f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -3160,6 +3160,7 @@ __intel_display_resume(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>  void intel_prepare_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
> +	bool requires_display_reset = true;
>  	struct drm_atomic_state *state;
>  	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *pctx;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -3169,8 +3170,12 @@ void intel_prepare_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* reset doesn't touch the display */
> -	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev))
> -		return;
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev)) {
> +		if (!i915.force_reset_modeset_test)
> +			return;
> +
> +		requires_display_reset = false;
> +	}
>  
>  	drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
>  	pctx = dev->mode_config.acquire_ctx;
> @@ -3199,12 +3204,15 @@ void intel_prepare_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  err:
>  	drm_atomic_state_free(state);
> +	if (!requires_display_reset)
> +		drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);

Why do we want to unlock here?

>  }
>  
>  void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
>  	struct drm_atomic_state *state = dev_priv->modeset_restore_state;
> +	bool hpd_init;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -3220,22 +3228,27 @@ void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  
>  	/* reset doesn't touch the display */
>  	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Flips in the rings have been nuked by the reset,
> -		 * so update the base address of all primary
> -		 * planes to the the last fb to make sure we're
> -		 * showing the correct fb after a reset.
> -		 *
> -		 * FIXME: Atomic will make this obsolete since we won't schedule
> -		 * CS-based flips (which might get lost in gpu resets) any more.
> -		 */
> -		intel_update_primary_planes(dev);
> -		return;
> +		hpd_init = false;
> +
> +		if (!state) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Flips in the rings have been nuked by the reset,
> +			 * so update the base address of all primary
> +			 * planes to the the last fb to make sure we're
> +			 * showing the correct fb after a reset.
> +			 *
> +			 * FIXME: Atomic will make this obsolete since we won't schedule
> +			 * CS-based flips (which might get lost in gpu resets) any more.
> +			 */
> +			intel_update_primary_planes(dev);

For this I guess. Hmm. Maybe hang on to the lock anyway, and add a
new flag in dev_priv or something to indicate if we're performing
a display reset or not. I suppose we could check for
(pre-g4x || i915.whatever) on either side, but that could
be problematic if someone changes the modparam mid-flight.

So finish_reset could perhaps looks something like (assuming we don't
want to run through the whole display init sequence on g4x+):

{
	if (!dev_priv->display_reset) {
		intel_update_primary_planes();
		return;
	}

	if (pre-g4x) {
		...

		ret = display_resume();

		init_hpd();
	} else {
		ret = display_resume();
	}

	unlock_all();
}


> +			return;
> +		}
>  	} else {
>  		/*
>  		 * The display has been reset as well,
>  		 * so need a full re-initialization.
>  		 */
> +		hpd_init = true;
>  		intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev_priv);
>  		intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
>  
> @@ -3255,7 +3268,8 @@ void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		DRM_ERROR("Restoring old state failed with %i\n", ret);
>  
> -	intel_hpd_init(dev_priv);
> +	if (hpd_init)
> +		intel_hpd_init(dev_priv);
>  
>  	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.1.0

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-05 10:56 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done during gpu reset Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-05 11:00 ` [PATCH i-g-t] drv_hangman: Add test for modeset " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-11  6:23   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Fix modeset handling " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-11  6:23     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done during gpu reset, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-25 16:33       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-04-20  7:02     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Fix modeset handling during gpu reset Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-25 16:10     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 13:01 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done " Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 13:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160425163339.GE4329@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox