public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/psr: Use ->get_aux_send_ctl functions
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:09:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160518180901.GB4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463590036-17824-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:47:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I just wanted to get rid of the rmw cycle for gen9, but this also
> fixes some bugs we haven't carried over, like using recommended
> precharge and timeout values.
> 
> Also I noticed that we don't set the fastwake sync length on skl, and
> that's used by PSR2 selective updates. Fix that.
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
> Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 25 ++++---------------------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 36330026ceff..cccf9bc7c7d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -770,6 +770,7 @@ static uint32_t skl_get_aux_send_ctl(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	       DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_1600us |
>  	       DP_AUX_CH_CTL_RECEIVE_ERROR |
>  	       (send_bytes << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> +	       DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FW_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32) |
>  	       DP_AUX_CH_CTL_SYNC_PULSE_SKL(32);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 87805078c8a3..f9ce47135bb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	uint32_t aux_clock_divider;
>  	i915_reg_t aux_ctl_reg;
> -	int precharge = 0x3;
>  	static const uint8_t aux_msg[] = {
>  		[0] = DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE << 4,
>  		[1] = DP_SET_POWER >> 8,
> @@ -185,6 +184,7 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		[4] = DP_SET_POWER_D0,
>  	};
>  	enum port port = dig_port->port;
> +	u32 aux_ctl;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(aux_msg) > 20);
> @@ -211,26 +211,9 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		I915_WRITE(psr_aux_data_reg(dev_priv, port, i >> 2),
>  			   intel_dp_pack_aux(&aux_msg[i], sizeof(aux_msg) - i));
>  
> -	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) {
> -		uint32_t val;
> -
> -		val = I915_READ(aux_ctl_reg);
> -		val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_MASK;
> -		val |= DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_1600us;
> -		val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_MASK;
> -		val |= (sizeof(aux_msg) << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT);
> -		/* Use hardcoded data values for PSR, frame sync and GTC */
> -		val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PSR_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL;
> -		val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FS_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL;
> -		val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_GTC_DATA_AUX_REG_SKL;
> -		I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg, val);
> -	} else {
> -		I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg,
> -		   DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TIME_OUT_400us |
> -		   (sizeof(aux_msg) << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> -		   (precharge << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_PRECHARGE_2US_SHIFT) |
> -		   (aux_clock_divider << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_SHIFT));
> -	}
> +	aux_ctl = intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl(intel_dp, 0, sizeof(aux_msg),
> +					     aux_clock_divider);
> +	I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg, aux_ctl);

The HSW/BDW EDP specific register doesn't have quite all the bits, but
looks like those bits are RO in the PSR register, so no harm in writing
1 to them.

The one difference I noticed was there's an "interrupt on error" bit
(bit 11) in the PSR register that doesn't exist in the normal register.
But we're not setting that bit here, so not a problem.

For SKL+ this makes a ton of sense to me.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

PS. perhaps someone should look into those interrupt bits a bit more?

>  }
>  
>  static void vlv_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -- 
> 2.8.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-18 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-18 16:47 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/psr: Try to program link training times correctly Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 18:04     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 18:09       ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-19 10:50   ` Jindal, Sonika
2016-05-20  7:33     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:46   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-25 22:52     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/psr: Skip aux handeshake if the vbt tells us to Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:47   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/psr: Order DP aux transactions correctly Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:51   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/psr: Use ->get_aux_send_ctl functions Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 18:09   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/psr: Implement PSR2 w/a for skl/kbl Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 18:22   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 18:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 22:07       ` Runyan, Arthur J
2016-05-19  7:14   ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement PSR2 w/a for gen9 Daniel Vetter
2016-05-19  8:55     ` Jindal, Sonika
2016-05-20  7:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:17 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw Patchwork
2016-05-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-19  9:36   ` Jindal, Sonika
2016-05-19  8:01 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw (rev2) Patchwork
2016-05-20  7:48   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160518180901.GB4329@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox