From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Add support for forcing 6 bpc on DP pipes.
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 12:01:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160525190148.GA10777@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160523174241.GA19596@shiv>
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:42:41AM -0700, Jim Bride wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:22:17AM +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 18:28 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > For DP compliance we need to be able to control the output color
> > > type for the pipe associated with the DP port. To do this we rely
> > > on the intel_dp_test_force_bpc debugfs file and the associated value
> > > stored in struct intel_dp. If the debugfs file has a non-zero value
> > > and we're on a display port connector, then we use the value from
> > > debugfs to calculate the bpp for the pipe. For cases where we are
> > > not on DP or there has not been an overridden value then we behave
> > > as normal.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index 5ffccf6..1618d36 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -12102,11 +12102,39 @@ compute_baseline_pipe_bpp(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > >
> > > /* Clamp display bpp to EDID value */
> > > for_each_connector_in_state(state, connector, connector_state, i) {
> > > + int type = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (connector_state->best_encoder) {
> > > + struct intel_encoder *ienc;
> > > +
> > > + ienc = to_intel_encoder(connector_state-
> > > >best_encoder);
> > > + type = ienc->type;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (connector_state->crtc != &crtc->base)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > - connected_sink_compute_bpp(to_intel_connector(connector),
> > > - pipe_config);
> > > + /* For DP compliance we need to ensure that we can override
> > > + * the computed bpp for the pipe.
> > > + */
> > > + if (type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
> > > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
> > > + enc_to_intel_dp(connector_state-
> > > >best_encoder);
> > > +
> > > + if (intel_dp &&
> > > + (intel_dp->compliance_force_bpc != 0)) {
> > > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp =
> > > + intel_dp->compliance_force_bpc*3;
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("JMB Setting pipe_bpp to %d\n",
> > > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> > > + } else {
> > > + connected_sink_compute_bpp(to_intel_connector
> > > (connector),
> > > + pipe_config);
> >
> > This kind of thing should be done in the encoder compute_config hook.
>
> Even though it's really not specific to an individual encoder configuration?
> This seems to be the central place where we're ensuring that we have a sane
> value for bpp relative to the display, and thus a good place to set this
> override to make compliance happy (which needs a specific bpc value for some
> test cases rather than one that is deemed sane relative to the sink's
> capabilities.
>
> >
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + connected_sink_compute_bpp(to_intel_connector(connect
> > > or),
> > > + pipe_config);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > return bpp;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > index e23eed7..10eaff8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > @@ -865,6 +865,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
> > > unsigned long compliance_test_type;
> > > unsigned long compliance_test_data;
> > > bool compliance_test_active;
> > > + unsigned long compliance_force_bpc; /* 0 for default or bpc to use */
> >
> > There's no code for setting compliance_test_active anywhere. The commit message
> > mentions debugfs, but I didn't see anything related in the patch.
The compliance_test_active is also being set as part of the compliance
test handlers for edid and video pattern generation.
>
> It appears that Manasi forgot to include one of the patches I had sent her.
> The debugfs support code was in a separate patch.
>
> Jim
We do not need the debugfs node to set the bpc value. Instead this bpc value in
intel_dp structure is being set as a part of video_pattern_autotes.
Instead of userspace setting this value through debugfs node, the kernel is setting this directly.
I will update the commit message to remove the debugfs node setting.
Manasi
>
> >
> >
> > Ander
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-30 1:28 [PATCH 0/5] Add automation support for DP compliance Tests Manasi Navare
2016-04-30 1:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Invoke the DP Compliance test request handler in the short pulse path Manasi Navare
2016-05-24 10:02 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-04-30 1:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Disable the Link training automation support Manasi Navare
2016-05-23 8:10 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-25 19:35 ` Manasi Navare
2016-04-30 1:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Fixes to support the DP Compliance EDID tests Manasi Navare
2016-05-23 8:18 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-24 9:31 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-05-24 9:35 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-05-26 0:22 ` Manasi Navare
2016-05-26 8:56 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-04-30 1:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] Add support for forcing 6 bpc on DP pipes Manasi Navare
2016-05-02 17:52 ` Jim Bride
2016-05-23 8:22 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-23 17:42 ` Jim Bride
2016-05-24 5:45 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-26 0:42 ` Manasi Navare
2016-05-26 9:00 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-25 19:01 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2016-04-30 1:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Implement intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern function for DP Video pattern compliance tests Manasi Navare
2016-05-23 12:00 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-05-25 22:46 ` Manasi Navare
2016-05-26 9:10 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-04-30 6:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Add automation support for DP compliance Tests Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160525190148.GA10777@intel.com \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox