From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Remaining PSR fixes
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 21:28:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160602182809.GO4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160531161700.14199.7549@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:17:00PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Remaining PSR fixes
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/8046/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 8046v1 drm/i915: Remaining PSR fixes
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/8046/revisions/1/mbox
>
> Test gem_close_race:
> Subgroup basic-process:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-ivb2-i7-3770)
ivb fails are
[ 176.194435] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: usb-storage/216
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96293
> Test gem_cpu_reloc:
> Subgroup basic:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-ivb2-i7-3770)
> Test gem_ctx_param:
> Subgroup basic:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-ivb2-i7-3770)
> Test gem_exec_basic:
> Subgroup gtt-default:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Subgroup gtt-vebox:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
> Subgroup readonly-bsd:
> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-ivb2-i7-3770)
> Test gem_exec_flush:
> Subgroup basic-uc-pro-default:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
skl fails are
[ 360.358514] [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-i7-4770k)
Hmm. Nothing in dmesg after
[ 403.811416] kms_pipe_crc_basic: starting subtest suspend-read-crc-pipe-A
so no clue what happened.
> Test kms_sink_crc_basic:
> pass -> SKIP (ro-bdw-i7-5600u)
> pass -> SKIP (ro-skl-i7-6700hq)
[ 114.613007] [drm:intel_dp_sink_crc [i915]] *ERROR* Panel is unable to calculate any CRC after 6 vblanks
Hmm. This could actually have something to with the patch set.
Looking at the long term CI results, at least the bdw seems to have
been rather solid since RO_CI_DRM_419 which included [1]. The skl
has been fluctuating until ~RO_CI_DRM_453, but I see no PSR related
changes around that time so I'm going to assume the apparent recent
stability was more of a fluke.
[1]
dc00b6a drm/i915/psr: Implement PSR2 w/a for gen9
d4dcbdc drm/i915/psr: Use ->get_aux_send_ctl functions
6f32ea7 drm/i915/psr: Order DP aux transactions correctly
1c80c25 drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again
50db139 drm/i915/psr: Try to program link training times correctly
>
> fi-byt-n2820 total:209 pass:168 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:38
> fi-hsw-i7-4770k total:184 pass:166 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17
> fi-hsw-i7-4770r total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23
> fi-skl-i5-6260u total:209 pass:198 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11
> fi-skl-i7-6700k total:209 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
> fi-snb-i7-2600 total:209 pass:170 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:102 pass:93 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:8
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:102 pass:74 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
> ro-bsw-n3050 total:209 pass:168 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:39
> ro-byt-n2820 total:209 pass:169 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:37
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:102 pass:82 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
> ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:204 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:57
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:102 pass:47 dwarn:32 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
> ro-skl-i7-6700hq total:204 pass:172 dwarn:9 dfail:1 fail:0 skip:22
> fi-bdw-i7-5557u failed to connect after reboot
> fi-bsw-n3050 failed to connect after reboot
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U failed to connect after reboot
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm failed to connect after reboot
> ro-ivb-i7-3770 failed to connect after reboot
> ro-snb-i7-2620M failed to connect after reboot
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1068/
>
> 877a1d2 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-31d-14h-57m-44s UTC integration manifest
> 8238bdb drm/i915: Move psr.link_standby setup to intel_psr_match_conditions()
> 58ee76a drm/i915: Ask the sink whether training is required when exiting PSR main-link off mode
> 5fe07aa drm/i915/psr: Skip aux handeshake if the vbt tells us to
> 6e98304 drm/i915: Check PSR setup time vs. vblank length
> 2a67384 drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_need_train_on_exit()
> 3ad03bc drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 15:50 [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915: Remaining PSR fixes ville.syrjala
2016-05-31 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time() ville.syrjala
2016-05-31 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_need_train_on_exit() ville.syrjala
2016-05-31 15:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Check PSR setup time vs. vblank length ville.syrjala
2016-08-05 22:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2016-08-08 7:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-08-08 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
2016-08-25 21:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2016-05-31 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/psr: Skip aux handeshake if the vbt tells us to ville.syrjala
2016-05-31 15:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Ask the sink whether training is required when exiting PSR main-link off mode ville.syrjala
2016-05-31 15:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Move psr.link_standby setup to intel_psr_match_conditions() ville.syrjala
2016-05-31 16:17 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Remaining PSR fixes Patchwork
2016-06-02 18:28 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-05-31 19:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 19:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-08 14:34 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-06-10 15:20 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160602182809.GO4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox