From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't unregister fbdev twice
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613142841.GD1338@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160608170302.GB18955@wunner.de>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:03:02PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:09:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:15:22PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > Calling drm_framebuffer_unregister_private() in intel_fbdev_destroy() is
> > > superfluous because the framebuffer will subsequently be unregistered by
> > > drm_framebuffer_free() when unreferenced in drm_framebuffer_remove().
> > > The call is a leftover, when it was introduced by commit 362063619cf6
> > > ("drm: revamp framebuffer cleanup interfaces"), struct intel_framebuffer
> > > was still embedded in struct intel_fbdev rather than being a pointer as
> > > it is today, and drm_framebuffer_remove() wasn't used yet.
> > >
> > > As a bonus, the ID of the framebuffer is no longer 0 in the debug log:
> > >
> > > Before:
> > > [ 39.680874] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 0 (3)
> > > [ 39.680878] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 0 (2)
> > > [ 39.680884] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 0 (1)
> > >
> > > After:
> > > [ 102.504649] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 45 (3)
> > > [ 102.504651] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 45 (2)
> > > [ 102.504654] [drm:drm_mode_object_unreference] OBJ ID: 45 (1)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> >
> > Hm yeah. But there's a pile of that particaluar cargo-culting copied all
> > over the place, would be really good to audit all callers of
> > unregister_private and fix them all up. A few older drivers still embed
> > the fbdev fb, but most don't but still use the unregister_private +
> > cleanup combo.
>
> Yes, I noticed that but i915 was the only one that I could actually test,
> the others I can only compile test. So fixing those up requires very
> careful examination and takes more time, but I'll keep it on my todo list.
>
>
> > Nitpick in your subject: s/fbdev/fbdev's fb/
>
> Right, should I post a v2 or are you going to fix it up if/when merging?
Fixed up while applying - I just waited for CI to get around (and then
w/e). Going through the other drivers to nuke the cargo-culting would
still be awesome.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 11:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't unregister fbdev twice Lukas Wunner
2016-06-08 12:05 ` ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2016-06-08 12:09 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2016-06-08 17:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-06-13 14:28 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160613142841.GD1338@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox