From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:01:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622130112.GC4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622123416.GB22318@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:34:16PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:25:27PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Would it be possible for writing timing requirement tests for individual
> updates of planes on the same CRTC? E.g. making sure that legacy cursor
> doesn't block pageflips and vice versa. Also extending that to
> independent updates of primary vs sprite planes?
I guess all that should be doable.
I was also thinking we should at least have some kind of basic
performance benchmark for atomic ioctls. Eg. do TEST_ONLY ioctls
with different sets of properties and make sure we don't totally
suck.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 17:25 [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/6] tests/kms_flip: Constify some function arguments ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/6] tests/kms_flip: Use USEC_PER_SEC ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/6] tests/kms_flip: Account for diff.tv_secs in jitter check ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/6] tests/kms_flip: Print the expected diff between two events ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/6] tests/kms_flip: Check that the last vs. current seq/ts are consistent ville.syrjala
2016-06-22 12:34 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form Chris Wilson
2016-06-22 13:01 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-06-22 13:11 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-22 13:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-22 20:33 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-23 12:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160622130112.GC4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox