* [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
@ 2016-05-13 17:53 ville.syrjala
2016-05-13 23:13 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-06-17 18:40 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ville.syrjala @ 2016-05-13 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Jani Nikula, stable
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
During hibernation the cached DP port register value will be left with
whatever value we have there when we create the hibernation image.
Currently that means the port (and eDP PLL) will be off in the cached
value. However when we resume there is no guarantee that the value
in the actual register will match the cached value. If i915 isn't
loaded in the kernel that loads the hibernation image, the port may
well be on (eg. left on by the BIOS). The encoder state readout
does the right thing in this case and updates our encoder state
to reflect the actual hardware state. However the post-resume modeset
will then use the stale cached port register value in
intel_dp_link_down() and potentially confuse the hardware.
This was caught by the following assert
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5288 at ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:2184 assert_edp_pll+0x99/0xa0 [i915]
eDP PLL state assertion failure (expected on, current off)
on account of the eDP PLL getting prematurely turned off when
shutting down the port, since the DP_PLL_ENABLE bit wasn't set
in the cached register value.
Presumably I introduced this problem in
commit 6fec76628333 ("drm/i915: Use intel_dp->DP in eDP PLL setup")
as before that we didn't update the cached value after shuttting the
port down. That's assuming the port got enabled at least once prior
to hibernating. If that didn't happen then the cached value would
still have been totally out of sync with reality (eg. first boot w/o
eDP on, then hibernate, and then resume with eDP on).
So, let's fix this properly and refresh the cached register value from
the hardware register during resume.
DDI platforms shouldn't use the cached value during port disable at
least, so shouldn't have this particular issue. They might still have
issues if we skip the initial modeset and then try to retrain the link
or something. But untangling this DP vs. DDI mess is a bigger topic,
so let's jut punt on DDI for now.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 6fec76628333 ("drm/i915: Use intel_dp->DP in eDP PLL setup")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 36330026ceff..a3f38115a3bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4522,13 +4522,15 @@ static void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
{
- struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->dev);
+ struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
+
+ if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
+ intel_dp->DP = I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
if (to_intel_encoder(encoder)->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
return;
- intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
-
pps_lock(intel_dp);
/*
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
2016-05-13 17:53 [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume ville.syrjala
@ 2016-05-13 23:13 ` Patchwork
2016-05-27 12:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-17 18:40 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-05-13 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7163/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 7163v1 drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7163/revisions/1/mbox
Test drv_hangman:
Subgroup error-state-basic:
pass -> FAIL (ro-ilk1-i5-650)
Test gem_exec_flush:
Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
fail -> PASS (ro-byt-n2820)
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
pass -> FAIL (ro-ivb2-i7-3770)
pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820)
ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:219 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38
ro-bdw-i7-5557U total:219 pass:206 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:219 pass:187 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
ro-bsw-n3050 total:219 pass:175 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:42
ro-byt-n2820 total:218 pass:174 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:41
ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:218 pass:193 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:219 pass:194 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
ro-ilk-i7-620lm total:219 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:67
ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:214 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:61
ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:219 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:36
ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:219 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:32
ro-skl-i7-6700hq total:214 pass:190 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
ro-snb-i7-2620M total:219 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:41
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_899/
1a536db drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-13d-21h-21m-06s UTC integration manifest
9b3616e drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
2016-05-13 23:13 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2016-05-27 12:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-05-27 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:13:19PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7163/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 7163v1 drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7163/revisions/1/mbox
>
> Test drv_hangman:
> Subgroup error-state-basic:
> pass -> FAIL (ro-ilk1-i5-650)
(drv_hangman:6249) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function assert_dfs_entry_not, file drv_hangman.c:124:
(drv_hangman:6249) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !(compare_dfs_entry(fname, s) == 0)
(drv_hangman:6249) CRITICAL: contents of i915_error_state: 'no error state collected' (expected not 'no error state collected'
Subtest error-state-basic failed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94305
> Test gem_exec_flush:
> Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
> fail -> PASS (ro-byt-n2820)
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> pass -> FAIL (ro-ivb2-i7-3770)
(kms_flip:7723) DEBUG: name = vblank
last_ts = 513.961115 usec
last_received_ts = 513.960588 usec
last_seq = 1174
current_ts = 514.127775 usec
current_received_ts = 514.127250 usec
current_seq = 1184
count = 9
seq_step = 10
(kms_flip:7723) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_final_state, file kms_flip.c:1192:
(kms_flip:7723) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: count >= expected * 99/100 && count <= expected * 101/100
(kms_flip:7723) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
(kms_flip:7723) CRITICAL: dropped frames, expected 99, counted 100, encoder type 2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95380
> pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820)
(kms_flip:7476) DEBUG: name = flip
last_ts = 518.968324 usec
last_received_ts = 518.968203 usec
last_seq = 14895
current_ts = 519.285148 usec
current_received_ts = 519.284928 usec
current_seq = 14905
count = 1
seq_step = 1
(kms_flip:7476) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:698:
(kms_flip:7476) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((((double) diff.tv_usec) - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005
(kms_flip:7476) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
(kms_flip:7476) CRITICAL: inter-flip ts jitter: 0s, 316824usec
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
>
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:219 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U total:219 pass:206 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:219 pass:187 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
> ro-bsw-n3050 total:219 pass:175 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:42
> ro-byt-n2820 total:218 pass:174 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:41
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:218 pass:193 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:219 pass:194 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm total:219 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:67
> ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:214 pass:151 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:61
> ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:219 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:36
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:219 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:32
> ro-skl-i7-6700hq total:214 pass:190 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
> ro-snb-i7-2620M total:219 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:41
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_899/
>
> 1a536db drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-13d-21h-21m-06s UTC integration manifest
> 9b3616e drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
2016-05-13 17:53 [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume ville.syrjala
2016-05-13 23:13 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2016-06-17 18:40 ` Imre Deak
2016-06-22 18:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Imre Deak @ 2016-06-17 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ville.syrjala, intel-gfx; +Cc: Jani Nikula, stable
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 20:53 +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> During hibernation the cached DP port register value will be left with
> whatever value we have there when we create the hibernation image.
> Currently that means the port (and eDP PLL) will be off in the cached
> value. However when we resume there is no guarantee that the value
> in the actual register will match the cached value. If i915 isn't
> loaded in the kernel that loads the hibernation image, the port may
> well be on (eg. left on by the BIOS). The encoder state readout
> does the right thing in this case and updates our encoder state
> to reflect the actual hardware state. However the post-resume modeset
> will then use the stale cached port register value in
> intel_dp_link_down() and potentially confuse the hardware.
>
> This was caught by the following assert
> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5288 at ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:2184 assert_edp_pll+0x99/0xa0 [i915]
> eDP PLL state assertion failure (expected on, current off)
> on account of the eDP PLL getting prematurely turned off when
> shutting down the port, since the DP_PLL_ENABLE bit wasn't set
> in the cached register value.
>
> Presumably I introduced this problem in
> commit 6fec76628333 ("drm/i915: Use intel_dp->DP in eDP PLL setup")
> as before that we didn't update the cached value after shuttting the
> port down. That's assuming the port got enabled at least once prior
> to hibernating. If that didn't happen then the cached value would
> still have been totally out of sync with reality (eg. first boot w/o
> eDP on, then hibernate, and then resume with eDP on).
>
> So, let's fix this properly and refresh the cached register value from
> the hardware register during resume.
>
> DDI platforms shouldn't use the cached value during port disable at
> least, so shouldn't have this particular issue. They might still have
> issues if we skip the initial modeset and then try to retrain the link
> or something. But untangling this DP vs. DDI mess is a bigger topic,
> so let's jut punt on DDI for now.
Since the DDI link retraining code seems to reset all relevant parts of
intel_dp->DP (lane, vswing, port enabled) would the above scenario be
really a problem? But syncing intel_dp->DP the same way for DDI makes
sense to me in any case.
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 6fec76628333 ("drm/i915: Use intel_dp->DP in eDP PLL setup")
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 36330026ceff..a3f38115a3bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4522,13 +4522,15 @@ static void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->dev);
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> + if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> + intel_dp->DP = I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
>
> if (to_intel_encoder(encoder)->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> return;
>
> - intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> -
> pps_lock(intel_dp);
>
> /*
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume
2016-06-17 18:40 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
@ 2016-06-22 18:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-06-22 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Imre Deak; +Cc: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx, stable
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:40:45PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 20:53 +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > During hibernation the cached DP port register value will be left with
> > whatever value we have there when we create the hibernation image.
> > Currently that means the port (and eDP PLL) will be off in the cached
> > value. However when we resume there is no guarantee that the value
> > in the actual register will match the cached value. If i915 isn't
> > loaded in the kernel that loads the hibernation image, the port may
> > well be on (eg. left on by the BIOS). The encoder state readout
> > does the right thing in this case and updates our encoder state
> > to reflect the actual hardware state. However the post-resume modeset
> > will then use the stale cached port register value in
> > intel_dp_link_down() and potentially confuse the hardware.
> >
> > This was caught by the following assert
> > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5288 at ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:2184 assert_edp_pll+0x99/0xa0 [i915]
> > eDP PLL state assertion failure (expected on, current off)
> > on account of the eDP PLL getting prematurely turned off when
> > shutting down the port, since the DP_PLL_ENABLE bit wasn't set
> > in the cached register value.
> >
> > Presumably I introduced this problem in
> > commit 6fec76628333 ("drm/i915: Use intel_dp->DP in eDP PLL setup")
> > as before that we didn't update the cached value after shuttting the
> > port down. That's assuming the port got enabled at least once prior
> > to hibernating. If that didn't happen then the cached value would
> > still have been totally out of sync with reality (eg. first boot w/o
> > eDP on, then hibernate, and then resume with eDP on).
> >
> > So, let's fix this properly and refresh the cached register value from
> > the hardware register during resume.
> >
> > DDI platforms shouldn't use the cached value during port disable at
> > least, so shouldn't have this particular issue. They might still have
> > issues if we skip the initial modeset and then try to retrain the link
> > or something. But untangling this DP vs. DDI mess is a bigger topic,
> > so let's jut punt on DDI for now.
>
> Since the DDI link retraining code seems to reset all relevant parts of
> intel_dp->DP (lane, vswing, port enabled) would the above scenario be
> really a problem? But syncing intel_dp->DP the same way for DDI makes
> sense to me in any case.
I didn't look too closely at the DDI case so far, so not sure what's
going on there.
>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 6fec76628333 ("drm/i915: Use intel_dp->DP in eDP PLL setup")
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Pushed to dinq. Thanks for the review.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 36330026ceff..a3f38115a3bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -4522,13 +4522,15 @@ static void intel_edp_panel_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >
> > void intel_dp_encoder_reset(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> > {
> > - struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->dev);
> > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> > +
> > + if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
> > + intel_dp->DP = I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
> >
> > if (to_intel_encoder(encoder)->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
> > return;
> >
> > - intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> > -
> > pps_lock(intel_dp);
> >
> > /*
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-22 18:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-13 17:53 [PATCH] drm/i915: Refresh cached DP port register value on resume ville.syrjala
2016-05-13 23:13 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-05-27 12:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-17 18:40 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2016-06-22 18:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox