From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
David Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait up to 3ms for the pcu to ack the cdclk change request on SKL
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:39:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160714143900.GG17101@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468416723-23440-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:32:03PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Bspec tells us to keep bashing the PCU for up to 3ms when trying to
> inform it about an upcoming change in the cdclk frequency. Currently
> we only keep at it for 15*10usec (+ whatever delays gets added by
> the sandybridge_pcode_read() itself). Let's change the limit to 3ms.
>
> I decided to keep 10 usec delay per iteration for now, even though
> the spec doesn't really tell us to do that.
>
> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Needs
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
and probably also a Fixes: line?
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +---------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index be3b2cab2640..90f26f0e2571 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -5691,15 +5691,7 @@ static bool skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> static bool skl_cdclk_wait_for_pcu_ready(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
> - if (skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(dev_priv))
> - return true;
> - udelay(10);
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> + return _wait_for(skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(dev_priv), 3000, 10) == 0;
> }
>
> static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk, int vco)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-13 13:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait up to 3ms for the pcu to ack the cdclk change request on SKL ville.syrjala
2016-07-13 13:37 ` David Weinehall
2016-07-13 14:07 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-07-18 12:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-07-13 18:42 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2016-07-14 14:39 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-07-27 13:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160714143900.GG17101@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=david.weinehall@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox