From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] drm/i915: Update bits per component for display info
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:41:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802114125.GU4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470136993.18917.3.camel@sorvi>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:23:13PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 15:51 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:04:53PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > > DisplayPort branch device may define max supported bits per
> > > component. Update display info based on this value if bpc
> > > is defined.
> > >
> > > v2: cleanup to match the drm_dp_helper.c patches introduced
> > > earlier in this series
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 76a654e..53ec844 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -3932,6 +3932,14 @@ intel_dp_detect_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > uint8_t *dpcd = intel_dp->dpcd;
> > > uint8_t type;
> > >
> > > + if (dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT) {
> > > + int bpc = drm_dp_downstream_max_bpc(dpcd,
> > > + intel_dp->downstream_ports);
> > > +
> > > + if (bpc > 0)
> > > + intel_dp->attached_connector->base.display_info.bpc = bpc;
> > > + }
> >
> > I think a function in the dp helpers to correctly fill out the connector's
> > display info would be neater.
> > -Daniel
> Ok. I can move this stuff to be part of dp helper routine.
I'm not sure frobbing with display_info is a good idea here since that
that one has so far been the EDID parsers domain. The ordering between
all this stuff is already very poorly defined/buggy, so some bigger
cleanup is probably needed. I have some patches to the EDID parser that
I should send out that at least make it a bit clearer where it fills out
the display_info stuff.
> Cheers,
> Mika
> >
> > > +
> > > if (!intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp))
> > > return connector_status_disconnected;
> > >
> > > @@ -3968,6 +3976,7 @@ intel_dp_detect_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > return connector_status_unknown;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +
> > > /* Anything else is out of spec, warn and ignore */
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Broken DP branch device, ignoring\n");
> > > return connector_status_disconnected;
> > > --
> > > 1.9.1
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Mika Kahola - Intel OTC
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 11:04 [PATCH v6 00/10] drm/i915: DP branch devices Mika Kahola
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] drm: Add missing DP downstream port types Mika Kahola
2016-07-25 15:03 ` Jim Bride
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] drm: Drop VGA from bpc definitions Mika Kahola
2016-07-25 15:03 ` Jim Bride
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] drm: Helper to read max clock rate Mika Kahola
2016-07-25 15:05 ` Jim Bride
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] drm: Helper to read max bits per component Mika Kahola
2016-07-25 15:07 ` Jim Bride
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] drm: Read DP branch device id Mika Kahola
2016-07-25 15:08 ` Jim Bride
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] drm: Read DP branch device HW revision Mika Kahola
2016-07-12 13:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-02 11:16 ` Mika Kahola
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] drm: Read DP branch device SW revision Mika Kahola
2016-07-25 15:09 ` Jim Bride
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] drm/i915: Check pixel rate for DP to VGA dongle Mika Kahola
2016-07-12 13:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-02 11:18 ` Mika Kahola
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] drm/i915: Update bits per component for display info Mika Kahola
2016-07-12 13:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-02 11:23 ` Mika Kahola
2016-08-02 11:41 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-08-02 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-06 11:04 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] drm/i915: Add DP branch device info on debugfs Mika Kahola
2016-07-12 13:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-07-06 11:50 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: DP branch devices (rev6) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802114125.GU4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox