From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:20:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803072035.GF4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803070815.23871.68940@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:08:15AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10580/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 10580v1 drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/10580/revisions/1/mbox
>
> Test kms_cursor_legacy:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-legacy:
> fail -> PASS (ro-skl3-i5-6260u)
> pass -> FAIL (fi-skl-i7-6700k)
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: target > 1
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) DEBUG: Using a target of 128 cursor updates per half-vblank
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_flip_vs_cursor, file kms_cursor_legacy.c:514:
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: get_vblank(display->drm_fd, pipe, 0) == vblank_start
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) CRITICAL: error: 11334 != 11333
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97188
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-varying-size:
> fail -> PASS (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820)
(kms_flip:7862) DEBUG: name = flip
last_ts = 518.830009
last_received_ts = 518.830101
last_seq = 1441
current_ts = 519.096530
current_received_ts = 519.108069
current_seq = 1457
count = 8
seq_step = 1
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:706:
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((usec_diff - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: inter-flip ts jitter: 0.266521, expected 0.166667
Still not 100% sure what's causing this. I suspect we got delayed prior to/while
issuing the flip/wait_vblank ioctl, and thus also the event gets delayed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95236
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> incomplete -> PASS (fi-skl-i7-6700k)
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
> pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-i7-4770k)
Machine died or something. Last thing in dmesg is:
[ 432.932711] kms_pipe_crc_basic: starting subtest suspend-read-crc-pipe-B
>
> fi-hsw-i7-4770k total:207 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-kbl-qkkr total:240 pass:182 dwarn:29 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:26
> fi-skl-i5-6260u total:240 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:14
> fi-skl-i7-6700k total:240 pass:208 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:28
> fi-snb-i7-2600 total:240 pass:198 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:42
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:240 pass:220 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U total:240 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:16
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:240 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:32
> ro-bsw-n3050 total:240 pass:194 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:42
> ro-byt-n2820 total:240 pass:196 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:40
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:240 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm total:240 pass:173 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:65
> ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:235 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:60
> ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:240 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:240 pass:209 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
> ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:240 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:14
> ro-snb-i7-2620M total:240 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:41
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r failed to connect after reboot
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1674/
>
> aa8628c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-02d-14h-10m-12s UTC integration manifest
> 6e847fb drm/i915: Account for sink max TMDS clock when checking the port clock
> 9a3e409 drm/i915: Replace a bunch of connector->base.display_info with a local variable
> 762796f drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock parsing out from drm_edid_to_eld()
> e291c32 drm/edid: Clear the old cea_rev when there's no CEA extension in the new EDID
> dcaed19 drm/edid: Reduce the number of times we parse the CEA extension block
> dcd4f28 drm/edid: Don't pass around drm_display_info needlessly
> 0b2bf83 drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock to drm_display_info
> 91e01e3 drm/edid: Make max_tmds_clock kHz instead of MHz
> 048bb06 drm/edid: Clear old dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock before parsing the new EDID
> 8d15b3f drm/edid: Clear old audio latency values before parsing the new EDID
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 6:33 [PATCH 00/10] drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/edid: Clear old audio latency values before parsing the new EDID ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/edid: Clear old dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock " ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/edid: Make max_tmds_clock kHz instead of MHz ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock to drm_display_info ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/edid: Don't pass around drm_display_info needlessly ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/edid: Reduce the number of times we parse the CEA extension block ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/edid: Clear the old cea_rev when there's no CEA extension in the new EDID ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock parsing out from drm_edid_to_eld() ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Replace a bunch of connector->base.display_info with a local variable ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Account for sink max TMDS clock when checking the port clock ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 7:08 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff Patchwork
2016-08-03 7:20 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-08-03 11:55 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160803072035.GF4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox