From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/13] Implement sw_sync test
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:41:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824204102.GH17171@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160824060142.GY10980@phenom.ffwll.local>
2016-08-24 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:56:02PM -0400, robert.foss@collabora.com wrote:
> > From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
> >
> > This series implements the sw_sync test and the lib/sw_sync helper functions
> > for said test.
> >
> > Gustavo Padovans sw_sync series was just de-staged in
> > gregkh-staging/staging-next [1], and this test is targeted at verifying the
> > functionality implemented in that series.
> >
> > The sw_sync subtests range from very basic tests of the sw_sync functionality,
> > to stress testing and randomized tests.
> >
> > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/
>
> This seems to be patches against igt (but the series is lacking the i-g-t-
> subject tag per CONTRIBUTING). I'm ok with that, but I thought the idea
> was to merge these testcases into the kernel's selftests? Did the plan
> change?
We still have the tests for kernel's selftests and the plan is to
upstream them but I think getting complete tests explicit fencing
infrastructure in i-g-t is good idea too. We work on more complex tests
in there and leave kselftest with the basic tests from the initial
patchset for the sw_sync kselftest.
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-24 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-23 17:56 [PATCH v1 00/13] Implement sw_sync test robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] lib/sw_sync: Add helper functions for managing synchronization primitives robert.foss
2016-08-23 22:05 ` [Mesa-dev] " Eric Engestrom
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] tests/sw_sync: Add sw_sync test robert.foss
2016-08-23 22:12 ` [Mesa-dev] " Eric Engestrom
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_fence_invalid_timeline robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_alloc_merge_fence robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_wait robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_merge_same robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_consumer_producer robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_random_merge robert.foss
2016-08-23 22:38 ` Eric Engestrom
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_timeline_wait robert.foss
2016-08-23 17:56 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_multi_producer_single_consumer robert.foss
2016-08-23 22:56 ` [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v1 00/13] Implement sw_sync test Eric Engestrom
2016-08-24 20:27 ` Robert Foss
2016-08-24 6:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-24 13:51 ` Robert Foss
2016-08-24 20:41 ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2016-08-25 6:56 ` Daniel Vetter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-23 17:53 robert.foss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160824204102.GH17171@joana \
--to=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox