From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Add a standalone function to obtain shared dpll for HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:08:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160907220821.GA28560@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472847689.1219.22.camel@dk-H97M-D3H>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:06:32PM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 15:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Add the PLL selection code for HSW/BDW/BXT/SKL into a stand-alone function
> > in order to allow for the implementation of a platform neutral upfront
> > link training function.
> >
> > v3:
> > * Add Hooks for all DDI platforms into this standalone function
> >
> > v2:
> > * Change the macro to use dev_priv instead of dev (David Weinehall)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 ++-
> > 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index e4b875e..67a6a0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -2393,6 +2393,44 @@ intel_ddi_init_hdmi_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
> > return connector;
> > }
> >
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > +intel_ddi_get_link_dpll(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int clock)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> > + struct intel_encoder *encoder = connector->encoder;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
> > + struct intel_shared_dpll_config tmp_pll_config;
> > + enum intel_dpll_id dpll_id;
> > +
> > + if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> > + dpll_id = (enum intel_dpll_id)dig_port->port;
> > + /*
> > + * Select the required PLL. This works for platforms where
> > + * there is no shared DPLL.
> > + */
> > + pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[dpll_id];
> > + if (WARN_ON(pll->active_mask)) {
> > +
> > + DRM_ERROR("Shared DPLL in use. active_mask:%x\n",
> > + pll->active_mask);
> > + pll = NULL;
> > + }
> > + tmp_pll_config = pll->config;
>
> NULL dereference when pll is in use?
Yes I had given this comment in the internal review. So we moved this assignment out
to the calling function, but left this here as well. I will remove this and resubmit.
Manasi
>
> > + if (!bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(clock,
> > + &pll->config.hw_state)) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("Could not setup DPLL\n");
> > + pll->config = tmp_pll_config;
> > + }
> > + } else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > + pll = skl_find_link_pll(dev_priv, clock);
> > + } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > + pll = hsw_ddi_dp_get_dpll(encoder, clock);
> > + }
> > + return pll;
> > +}
> > +
> > void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 9a1da98..4b067ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,44 @@
> > #include "intel_drv.h"
> >
> > struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > +skl_find_link_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int clock)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
> > + struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state;
> > + enum intel_dpll_id i;
> > + bool found = false;
> > +
> > + if (!skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(clock, &dpll_hw_state))
> > + return pll;
> > +
> > + for (i = DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL1; i <= DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL3; i++) {
> > + pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
> > +
> > + /* Only want to check enabled timings first */
> > + if (pll->config.crtc_mask == 0)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (memcmp(&dpll_hw_state, &pll->config.hw_state,
> > + sizeof(pll->config.hw_state)) == 0) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Ok no matching timings, maybe there's a free one? */
> > + for (i = DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL1;
> > + ((found == false) && (i <= DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL3)); i++) {
> > + pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
> > + if (pll->config.crtc_mask == 0) {
> > + pll->config.hw_state = dpll_hw_state;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return pll;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > intel_get_shared_dpll_by_id(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > enum intel_dpll_id id)
> > {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > index aed7408..f438535 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ bool bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > /* SKL dpll related functions */
> > bool skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *skl_find_link_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + int clock);
> >
> >
> > /* HSW dpll related functions */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 529fa7b..efcd80b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1159,7 +1159,8 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> > void intel_ddi_set_vc_payload_alloc(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool state);
> > uint32_t ddi_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > -
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *intel_ddi_get_link_dpll(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > + int clock);
> > unsigned int intel_fb_align_height(struct drm_device *dev,
> > unsigned int height,
> > uint32_t pixel_format,
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-07 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-01 22:08 [PATCH 00/14] Enable Upfront Link Training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc_state to intel_dp_set_link_params() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: Remove ddi_pll_sel from intel_crtc_state Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] drm/i915: Split intel_ddi_pre_enable() into DP and HDMI versions Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915: Split bxt_ddi_pll_select() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Split skl_get_dpll() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Split hsw_get_dpll() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Add a standalone function to obtain shared dpll for HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 20:06 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07 22:08 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2016-09-07 22:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp: Move max. vswing check to it's own function Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 8:05 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 9:58 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 21:25 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 0:13 ` [PATCH v2 8/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 7:00 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 7:38 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-13 11:44 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/dp/i915: Make clock recovery in the link training compliant with DP Spec 1.2 Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 9:16 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-02 17:55 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07 0:13 ` [PATCH v2 9/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 7:33 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 8:20 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Make DP link training channel equalization DP 1.2 Spec compliant Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 11:20 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-02 19:05 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07 7:50 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-13 16:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 12:03 ` David Weinehall
2016-09-06 17:34 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 12:49 ` David Weinehall
2016-09-06 17:54 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 13:00 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 18:01 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 19:52 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-02 20:01 ` Jim Bride
2016-09-07 0:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 9:47 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 16:47 ` Jim Bride
2016-09-07 16:48 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 0:30 ` [PATCH v4 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 9:32 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-09 1:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09 7:11 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 7:11 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 17:13 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-09 23:29 ` [PATCH v5 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Reverse the loop in intel_dp_compute_config Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 13:08 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 14:47 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 20:24 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-08 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-13 1:14 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-14 1:05 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT (DDI platforms) Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 0:13 ` [PATCH v12 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 18:28 ` [PATCH v13 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 12:10 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 15:06 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 17:22 ` [PATCH v14 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 20:02 ` [PATCH v15 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-09 7:34 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 23:29 ` [PATCH 13-1/14] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-12 23:21 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09 23:29 ` [PATCH v16 13-2/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT Manasi Navare
2016-09-13 0:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09 7:31 ` [PATCH v14 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT (DDI platforms) Jani Nikula
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 0:13 ` [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 10:53 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 16:40 ` Jim Bride
2016-09-08 10:21 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 11:50 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-01 22:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Enable upfront link training on DDI platforms (rev3) Patchwork
2016-09-07 0:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Enable upfront link training on DDI platforms (rev8) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160907220821.GA28560@intel.com \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).