intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Add a standalone function to obtain shared dpll for HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:08:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160907220821.GA28560@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472847689.1219.22.camel@dk-H97M-D3H>

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 01:06:32PM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 15:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Add the PLL selection code for HSW/BDW/BXT/SKL into a stand-alone function
> > in order to allow for the implementation of a platform neutral upfront
> > link training function.
> > 
> > v3:
> > * Add Hooks for all DDI platforms into this standalone function
> > 
> > v2:
> > * Change the macro to use dev_priv instead of dev (David Weinehall)
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c      | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h |  2 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h      |  3 ++-
> >  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index e4b875e..67a6a0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -2393,6 +2393,44 @@ intel_ddi_init_hdmi_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
> >  	return connector;
> >  }
> >  
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > +intel_ddi_get_link_dpll(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int clock)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> > +	struct intel_encoder *encoder = connector->encoder;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll_config tmp_pll_config;
> > +	enum intel_dpll_id dpll_id;
> > +
> > +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) {
> > +		dpll_id =  (enum intel_dpll_id)dig_port->port;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Select the required PLL. This works for platforms where
> > +		 * there is no shared DPLL.
> > +		 */
> > +		pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[dpll_id];
> > +		if (WARN_ON(pll->active_mask)) {
> > +
> > +			DRM_ERROR("Shared DPLL in use. active_mask:%x\n",
> > +				  pll->active_mask);
> > +			pll = NULL;
> > +		}
> > +		tmp_pll_config = pll->config;
> 
> NULL dereference when pll is in use? 

Yes I had given this comment in the internal review. So we moved this assignment out 
to the calling function, but left this here as well. I will remove this and resubmit.

Manasi
> 
> > +		if (!bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(clock,
> > +						  &pll->config.hw_state)) {
> > +			DRM_ERROR("Could not setup DPLL\n");
> > +			pll->config = tmp_pll_config;
> > +		}
> > +	} else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > +		pll = skl_find_link_pll(dev_priv, clock);
> > +	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> > +		pll = hsw_ddi_dp_get_dpll(encoder, clock);
> > +	}
> > +	return pll;
> > +}
> > +
> >  void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_device *dev, enum port port)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 9a1da98..4b067ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,44 @@
> >  #include "intel_drv.h"
> >  
> >  struct intel_shared_dpll *
> > +skl_find_link_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int clock)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = NULL;
> > +	struct intel_dpll_hw_state dpll_hw_state;
> > +	enum intel_dpll_id i;
> > +	bool found = false;
> > +
> > +	if (!skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(clock, &dpll_hw_state))
> > +		return pll;
> > +
> > +	for (i = DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL1; i <= DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL3; i++) {
> > +		pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
> > +
> > +		/* Only want to check enabled timings first */
> > +		if (pll->config.crtc_mask == 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (memcmp(&dpll_hw_state, &pll->config.hw_state,
> > +			   sizeof(pll->config.hw_state)) == 0) {
> > +			found = true;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Ok no matching timings, maybe there's a free one? */
> > +	for (i = DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL1;
> > +	     ((found == false) && (i <= DPLL_ID_SKL_DPLL3)); i++) {
> > +		pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];
> > +		if (pll->config.crtc_mask == 0) {
> > +			pll->config.hw_state = dpll_hw_state;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return pll;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *
> >  intel_get_shared_dpll_by_id(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			    enum intel_dpll_id id)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > index aed7408..f438535 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> > @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ bool bxt_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> >  /* SKL dpll related functions */
> >  bool skl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> >  				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *skl_find_link_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +					    int clock);
> >  
> > 
> >  /* HSW dpll related functions */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 529fa7b..efcd80b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1159,7 +1159,8 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  			 struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> >  void intel_ddi_set_vc_payload_alloc(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool state);
> >  uint32_t ddi_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > -
> > +struct intel_shared_dpll *intel_ddi_get_link_dpll(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > +						  int clock);
> >  unsigned int intel_fb_align_height(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  				   unsigned int height,
> >  				   uint32_t pixel_format,
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-07 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01 22:08 [PATCH 00/14] Enable Upfront Link Training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915: Don't pass crtc_state to intel_dp_set_link_params() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915: Remove ddi_pll_sel from intel_crtc_state Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] drm/i915: Split intel_ddi_pre_enable() into DP and HDMI versions Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915: Split bxt_ddi_pll_select() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Split skl_get_dpll() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Split hsw_get_dpll() Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Add a standalone function to obtain shared dpll for HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 20:06   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07 22:08     ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2016-09-07 22:47   ` [PATCH v4 7/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp: Move max. vswing check to it's own function Manasi Navare
2016-09-02  8:05   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06  9:58     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 21:25       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 8/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  7:00     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  7:38       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-13 11:44         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/dp/i915: Make clock recovery in the link training compliant with DP Spec 1.2 Manasi Navare
2016-09-02  9:16   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-02 17:55     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 9/14] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  7:33     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  8:20       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Make DP link training channel equalization DP 1.2 Spec compliant Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 11:20   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-02 19:05     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-07  7:50       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-13 16:09         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 12:03   ` David Weinehall
2016-09-06 17:34     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 12:49   ` David Weinehall
2016-09-06 17:54     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 13:00   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-06 18:01     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 19:52   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-02 20:01     ` Jim Bride
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  9:47     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 16:47       ` Jim Bride
2016-09-07 16:48       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v3 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  0:30       ` [PATCH v4 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08  9:32         ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-09  1:05         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09  7:11           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09  7:11         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 17:13           ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-09 23:29         ` [PATCH v5 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Reverse the loop in intel_dp_compute_config Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 13:08   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 14:47     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-02 20:24   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-08 20:02   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-13  1:14     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-14  1:05       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT (DDI platforms) Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v12 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 18:28     ` [PATCH v13 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 12:10       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 15:06         ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 17:22       ` [PATCH v14 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-08 20:02         ` [PATCH v15 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-09  7:34           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-09 23:29           ` [PATCH 13-1/14] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-12 23:21             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09 23:29           ` [PATCH v16 13-2/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT Manasi Navare
2016-09-13  0:22             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-09-09  7:31         ` [PATCH v14 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training for typeC DP support on HSW/BDW/SKL/BXT (DDI platforms) Jani Nikula
2016-09-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-07  0:13   ` [PATCH v2 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-07 10:53     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-07 16:40       ` Jim Bride
2016-09-08 10:21         ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-08 11:50       ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-01 22:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Enable upfront link training on DDI platforms (rev3) Patchwork
2016-09-07  0:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Enable upfront link training on DDI platforms (rev8) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160907220821.GA28560@intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).