From: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/skl+: change WM calc to fixed point 16.16
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 16:56:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908112634.14957-7-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160908112634.14957-1-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
This patch changes Watermak calculation to fixed point calculation.
Problem with current calculation is during plane_blocks_per_line
calculation we divide intermediate blocks with min_scanlines and
takes floor of the result because of integer operation.
hence we end-up assigning less blocks than required. Which leads to
flickers.
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 0ec328b..d4390e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3530,13 +3530,15 @@ static uint32_t skl_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *config)
*/
static uint32_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint8_t cpp, uint32_t latency)
{
- uint32_t wm_intermediate_val, ret;
+ uint64_t wm_intermediate_val;
+ uint32_t ret;
if (latency == 0)
return UINT_MAX;
- wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate * cpp / 512;
- ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(wm_intermediate_val, 1000);
+ wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate * cpp;
+ wm_intermediate_val <<= 16;
+ ret = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(wm_intermediate_val, 1000 * 512);
return ret;
}
@@ -3605,6 +3607,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
uint16_t *out_blocks = &result->plane_res_b[id];
uint8_t *out_lines = &result->plane_res_l[id];
enum watermark_memory_wa mem_wa;
+ bool y_tiled = false;
if (latency == 0 || !cstate->base.active || !intel_pstate->base.visible)
return 0;
@@ -3652,14 +3655,18 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
plane_bytes_per_line = width * cpp;
if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+ y_tiled = true;
plane_blocks_per_line =
DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line * y_min_scanlines, 512);
- plane_blocks_per_line /= y_min_scanlines;
+ plane_blocks_per_line = (plane_blocks_per_line << 16) /
+ y_min_scanlines;
} else if (fb->modifier[0] == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) {
plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512)
+ 1;
+ plane_blocks_per_line <<= 16;
} else {
plane_blocks_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(plane_bytes_per_line, 512);
+ plane_blocks_per_line <<= 16;
}
method1 = skl_wm_method1(plane_pixel_rate, cpp, latency);
@@ -3670,8 +3677,7 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
y_tile_minimum = plane_blocks_per_line * y_min_scanlines;
- if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
- fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+ if (y_tiled) {
selected_result = max(method2, y_tile_minimum);
} else {
uint32_t linetime_us = 0;
@@ -3688,12 +3694,11 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
selected_result = method1;
}
- res_blocks = selected_result + 1;
+ res_blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(selected_result, 1 << 16) + 1;
res_lines = DIV_ROUND_UP(selected_result, plane_blocks_per_line);
if (level >= 1 && level <= 7) {
- if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
- fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+ if (y_tiled) {
res_blocks += y_tile_minimum;
res_lines += y_min_scanlines;
} else {
--
2.8.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 12:35 [PATCH 0/7] Implement New DDB allocation algorithm Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/hsw+: set intel_crtc active once pipe is active Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-30 19:18 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-08-31 10:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-08-31 14:04 ` Mahesh Kumar
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/skl+: use linetime latency instead of ddb size Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/skl: pass pipe_wm in skl_compute_(wm_level/plane_wm) functions Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-31 13:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-08-31 14:18 ` Mahesh Kumar
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Decode system memory bandwidth Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH] FOR_UPSTREAM [VPG]: drm/i915/skl+: Implement Transition WM Kumar, Mahesh
2016-08-30 19:32 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-08-31 13:47 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-09-02 11:46 ` Mahesh Kumar
2016-09-02 12:21 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-08-29 12:35 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: WM memory bandwidth related workaround Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] New DDB Algo and WM fixes Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drm/i915/skl: pass pipe_wm in skl_compute_(wm_level/plane_wm) functions Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915/skl+: use linetime latency instead of ddb size Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/skl: New ddb allocation algorithm Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/i915: Decode system memory bandwidth Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] drm/i915/gen9: WM memory bandwidth related workaround Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` Kumar, Mahesh [this message]
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] drm/i915/bxt: Enable IPC support Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] drm/i915/bxt: set chicken bit as IPC y-tile WA Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] drm/i915/bxt: Implement Transition WM Kumar, Mahesh
2016-09-08 11:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Implement New DDB allocation algorithm Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160908112634.14957-7-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
--to=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox