intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:25:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915192551.GB15527@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473962616.32398.5.camel@dk-H97M-D3H>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:48:17AM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Add upfront link training to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid() so that we know
> > topology constraints before we validate the legality of modes to be
> > checked.
> > 
> 
> The patch seems to do a lot more things than just what is described
> here. I guess, it would be better to split this into multiple patches or
> at least provide adequate description here.
> 

I think the only other thing its doing is making some functions
non static so they can be used for MST upfront enabling.
But I think that can be in the same patch since it is done in order
to enable upfront for MST.
Jim, any thoughts?


> > v3:
> > * Reset the upfront values but dont unset the EDID for MST. (Manasi)
> > v2:
> > * Rebased on new revision of link training patch. (Manasi)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c     | 15 ++++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h    |  3 ++
> >  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > index 9042d28..635830e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  				      enum pipe pipe);
> >  static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >  
> > -static int
> > +int
> >  intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp  *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >  	int max_link_bw = intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE];
> > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp  *intel_dp)
> >  	return max_link_bw;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >  	u8 temp, source_max, sink_max;
> > @@ -296,8 +296,7 @@ static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
> >  	return k;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > -				 int *common_rates)
> > +int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int *common_rates)
> >  {
> >  	const int *source_rates, *sink_rates;
> >  	int source_len, sink_len;
> > @@ -321,7 +320,7 @@ static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >  			       common_rates);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static bool intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +bool intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >  	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> > @@ -4545,12 +4544,12 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  out:
> > -	if ((status != connector_status_connected) &&
> > -	    (intel_dp->is_mst == false)) {
> > -		intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> > +	if (status != connector_status_connected) {
> >  		intel_dp->upfront_done = false;
> >  		intel_dp->max_lanes_upfront = 0;
> >  		intel_dp->max_link_rate_upfront = 0;
> > +		if (intel_dp->is_mst == false)
> > +			intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > index 54a9d76..98d45a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > @@ -41,21 +41,30 @@ static bool intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  	int bpp;
> >  	int lane_count, slots;
> >  	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode;
> > -	int mst_pbn;
> > +	int mst_pbn, common_len;
> > +	int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
> >  
> >  	pipe_config->dp_encoder_is_mst = true;
> >  	pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
> > -	bpp = 24;
> > +
> >  	/*
> > -	 * for MST we always configure max link bw - the spec doesn't
> > -	 * seem to suggest we should do otherwise.
> > +	 * For MST we always configure for the maximum trainable link bw -
> > +	 * the spec doesn't seem to suggest we should do otherwise.  The
> > +	 * calls to intel_dp_max_lane_count() and intel_dp_common_rates()
> > +	 * both take successful upfront link training into account, and
> > +	 * return the DisplayPort max supported values in the event that
> > +	 * upfront link training was not done.
> >  	 */
> > -	lane_count = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd);
> > +	lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
> >  
> >  	pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
> >  
> > -	pipe_config->pipe_bpp = 24;
> > -	pipe_config->port_clock = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
> > +	pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp = 24;
> > +	common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
> > +	pipe_config->port_clock = common_rates[common_len - 1];
> > +
> > +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP MST link configured for %d lanes @ %d.\n",
> > +		      pipe_config->lane_count, pipe_config->port_clock);
> >  
> >  	state = pipe_config->base.state;
> >  
> > @@ -137,6 +146,8 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  	enum port port = intel_dig_port->port;
> >  	struct intel_connector *connector =
> >  		to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = pipe_config->shared_dpll;
> > +	struct intel_shared_dpll_config tmp_pll_config;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	uint32_t temp;
> >  	int slots;
> > @@ -150,21 +161,23 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%d\n", intel_dp->active_mst_links);
> >  
> >  	if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0) {
> > -		intel_ddi_clk_select(&intel_dig_port->base,
> > -				     pipe_config->shared_dpll);
> > -
> > -		intel_prepare_dp_ddi_buffers(&intel_dig_port->base);
> > -		intel_dp_set_link_params(intel_dp,
> > -					 pipe_config->port_clock,
> > -					 pipe_config->lane_count,
> > -					 true);
> > -
> > -		intel_ddi_init_dp_buf_reg(&intel_dig_port->base);
> >  
> > -		intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
> > +		/* Disable the PLL since we need to acquire the PLL
> > +		 * based on the link rate in the link training sequence
> > +		 */
> > +		tmp_pll_config = pll->config;
> > +		pll->funcs.disable(dev_priv, pll);
> > +		pll->config.crtc_mask = 0;
> > +
> > +		/* If Link Training fails, send a uevent to generate a
> > +		 *hotplug
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!(intel_ddi_link_train(intel_dp, pipe_config->port_clock,
> > +					   pipe_config->lane_count, true,
> > +					   false)))
> > +			drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(encoder->base.dev);
> > +		pll->config = tmp_pll_config;
> >  
> > -		intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
> > -		intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> > @@ -336,6 +349,27 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >  			struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> >  {
> >  	int max_dotclk = to_i915(connector->dev)->max_dotclk_freq;
> > +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
> > +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_connector->mst_port;
> > +
> > +	if (intel_dp->upfront_link_train && !intel_dp->upfront_done) {
> > +		bool do_upfront_link_train;
> > +
> > +		do_upfront_link_train = intel_dp->compliance_test_type !=
> > +			DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
> > +		if (do_upfront_link_train) {
> > +			intel_dp->upfront_done =
> > +				intel_dp_upfront_link_train(intel_dp);
> > +			if (intel_dp->upfront_done) {
> > +				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST upfront trained at "
> > +					      "%d lanes @ %d.",
> > +					      intel_dp->max_lanes_upfront,
> > +					      intel_dp->max_link_rate_upfront);
> > +			} else
> > +				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST upfront link training "
> > +					      "failed.");
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/* TODO - validate mode against available PBN for link */
> >  	if (mode->clock < 10000)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index fc2f1bc..b4bc002 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1416,6 +1416,7 @@ void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >  void intel_dp_add_properties(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_connector *connector);
> >  void intel_dp_mst_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
> >  void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
> > +u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >  int intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >  int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int *common_rates,
> >  			     int link_rate);
> > @@ -1446,6 +1447,8 @@ intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t voltage_swing);
> >  void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int port_clock,
> >  			   uint8_t *link_bw, uint8_t *rate_select);
> >  bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > +int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int *common_rates);
> > +bool intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >  bool
> >  intel_dp_get_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE]);
> >  
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-15 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-14  1:08 [PATCH 0/5] Remaining patches for upfront link training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  1:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  8:15   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-15 19:56     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  1:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  1:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-15  7:41   ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-15 19:08     ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  1:08 ` [PATCH v17 4/5] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  1:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-15 17:48   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-15 19:25     ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2016-09-19 17:03       ` Jim Bride
2016-09-19 17:22         ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-14  5:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Remaining patches for upfront link training on DDI platforms Patchwork
2016-09-16  0:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  0:03   ` [PATCH v6 1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  9:29     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-16 18:45     ` [PATCH v7 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-26 13:39       ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-27 15:25         ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-27 17:07           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29  6:41             ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-29 11:26               ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 11:44                 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-29 15:10                   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-09-29 15:48                     ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 16:05                       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-29 23:17                         ` Manasi Navare
2016-10-03 23:29                           ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  0:04   ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-26 13:41     ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-27 13:39       ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-27 22:13         ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-28  7:14           ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-28 22:30             ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-27 21:55       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-28  7:38         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-28 16:45           ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-29 14:52             ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-16  0:04   ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  8:12     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-16  0:04   ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Code cleanup to use dev_priv and INTEL_GEN Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  7:40     ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-26 13:45     ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-28  0:03       ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  0:04   ` [PATCH v17 5/6] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-20 22:04     ` [PATCH v18 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-27 13:59       ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 12:15       ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 16:05         ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-16  0:04   ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-16  0:47   ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v6,1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Patchwork
2016-09-16 19:25   ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v7,1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training (rev2) Patchwork
2016-09-20  8:45   ` [PATCH 0/6] Remaining patches for upfront link training on DDI platforms Jani Nikula
2016-09-20 22:49   ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v7,1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160915192551.GB15527@intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).