From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:03:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160919170329.GA2172@shiv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160915192551.GB15527@intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:51PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:48:17AM -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:08 -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Add upfront link training to intel_dp_mst_mode_valid() so that we know
> > > topology constraints before we validate the legality of modes to be
> > > checked.
> > >
> >
> > The patch seems to do a lot more things than just what is described
> > here. I guess, it would be better to split this into multiple patches or
> > at least provide adequate description here.
> >
>
> I think the only other thing its doing is making some functions
> non static so they can be used for MST upfront enabling.
> But I think that can be in the same patch since it is done in order
> to enable upfront for MST.
> Jim, any thoughts?
This is exactly the case.
Jim
>
> > > v3:
> > > * Reset the upfront values but dont unset the EDID for MST. (Manasi)
> > > v2:
> > > * Rebased on new revision of link training patch. (Manasi)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 15 ++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 ++
> > > 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 9042d28..635830e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > enum pipe pipe);
> > > static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > >
> > > -static int
> > > +int
> > > intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > int max_link_bw = intel_dp->dpcd[DP_MAX_LINK_RATE];
> > > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > return max_link_bw;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > +u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > u8 temp, source_max, sink_max;
> > > @@ -296,8 +296,7 @@ static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
> > > return k;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > - int *common_rates)
> > > +int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int *common_rates)
> > > {
> > > const int *source_rates, *sink_rates;
> > > int source_len, sink_len;
> > > @@ -321,7 +320,7 @@ static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > common_rates);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static bool intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > +bool intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > > struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
> > > @@ -4545,12 +4544,12 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
> > > }
> > >
> > > out:
> > > - if ((status != connector_status_connected) &&
> > > - (intel_dp->is_mst == false)) {
> > > - intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> > > + if (status != connector_status_connected) {
> > > intel_dp->upfront_done = false;
> > > intel_dp->max_lanes_upfront = 0;
> > > intel_dp->max_link_rate_upfront = 0;
> > > + if (intel_dp->is_mst == false)
> > > + intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > index 54a9d76..98d45a4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> > > @@ -41,21 +41,30 @@ static bool intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > int bpp;
> > > int lane_count, slots;
> > > const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode;
> > > - int mst_pbn;
> > > + int mst_pbn, common_len;
> > > + int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
> > >
> > > pipe_config->dp_encoder_is_mst = true;
> > > pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
> > > - bpp = 24;
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > - * for MST we always configure max link bw - the spec doesn't
> > > - * seem to suggest we should do otherwise.
> > > + * For MST we always configure for the maximum trainable link bw -
> > > + * the spec doesn't seem to suggest we should do otherwise. The
> > > + * calls to intel_dp_max_lane_count() and intel_dp_common_rates()
> > > + * both take successful upfront link training into account, and
> > > + * return the DisplayPort max supported values in the event that
> > > + * upfront link training was not done.
> > > */
> > > - lane_count = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd);
> > > + lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
> > >
> > > - pipe_config->pipe_bpp = 24;
> > > - pipe_config->port_clock = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
> > > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp = 24;
> > > + common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
> > > + pipe_config->port_clock = common_rates[common_len - 1];
> > > +
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP MST link configured for %d lanes @ %d.\n",
> > > + pipe_config->lane_count, pipe_config->port_clock);
> > >
> > > state = pipe_config->base.state;
> > >
> > > @@ -137,6 +146,8 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > enum port port = intel_dig_port->port;
> > > struct intel_connector *connector =
> > > to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> > > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = pipe_config->shared_dpll;
> > > + struct intel_shared_dpll_config tmp_pll_config;
> > > int ret;
> > > uint32_t temp;
> > > int slots;
> > > @@ -150,21 +161,23 @@ static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%d\n", intel_dp->active_mst_links);
> > >
> > > if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0) {
> > > - intel_ddi_clk_select(&intel_dig_port->base,
> > > - pipe_config->shared_dpll);
> > > -
> > > - intel_prepare_dp_ddi_buffers(&intel_dig_port->base);
> > > - intel_dp_set_link_params(intel_dp,
> > > - pipe_config->port_clock,
> > > - pipe_config->lane_count,
> > > - true);
> > > -
> > > - intel_ddi_init_dp_buf_reg(&intel_dig_port->base);
> > >
> > > - intel_dp_sink_dpms(intel_dp, DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON);
> > > + /* Disable the PLL since we need to acquire the PLL
> > > + * based on the link rate in the link training sequence
> > > + */
> > > + tmp_pll_config = pll->config;
> > > + pll->funcs.disable(dev_priv, pll);
> > > + pll->config.crtc_mask = 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* If Link Training fails, send a uevent to generate a
> > > + *hotplug
> > > + */
> > > + if (!(intel_ddi_link_train(intel_dp, pipe_config->port_clock,
> > > + pipe_config->lane_count, true,
> > > + false)))
> > > + drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(encoder->base.dev);
> > > + pll->config = tmp_pll_config;
> > >
> > > - intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
> > > - intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> > > @@ -336,6 +349,27 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > > struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> > > {
> > > int max_dotclk = to_i915(connector->dev)->max_dotclk_freq;
> > > + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
> > > + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_connector->mst_port;
> > > +
> > > + if (intel_dp->upfront_link_train && !intel_dp->upfront_done) {
> > > + bool do_upfront_link_train;
> > > +
> > > + do_upfront_link_train = intel_dp->compliance_test_type !=
> > > + DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
> > > + if (do_upfront_link_train) {
> > > + intel_dp->upfront_done =
> > > + intel_dp_upfront_link_train(intel_dp);
> > > + if (intel_dp->upfront_done) {
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST upfront trained at "
> > > + "%d lanes @ %d.",
> > > + intel_dp->max_lanes_upfront,
> > > + intel_dp->max_link_rate_upfront);
> > > + } else
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("MST upfront link training "
> > > + "failed.");
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /* TODO - validate mode against available PBN for link */
> > > if (mode->clock < 10000)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > index fc2f1bc..b4bc002 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > @@ -1416,6 +1416,7 @@ void intel_edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > > void intel_dp_add_properties(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_connector *connector);
> > > void intel_dp_mst_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > +u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > > int intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > > int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int *common_rates,
> > > int link_rate);
> > > @@ -1446,6 +1447,8 @@ intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t voltage_swing);
> > > void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int port_clock,
> > > uint8_t *link_bw, uint8_t *rate_select);
> > > bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > > +int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int *common_rates);
> > > +bool intel_dp_upfront_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> > > bool
> > > intel_dp_get_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE]);
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-19 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 1:08 [PATCH 0/5] Remaining patches for upfront link training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 1:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 8:15 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-15 19:56 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 1:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 1:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-15 7:41 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-15 19:08 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 1:08 ` [PATCH v17 4/5] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 1:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-15 17:48 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2016-09-15 19:25 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-19 17:03 ` Jim Bride [this message]
2016-09-19 17:22 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-14 5:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Remaining patches for upfront link training on DDI platforms Patchwork
2016-09-16 0:03 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 0:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 9:29 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-16 18:45 ` [PATCH v7 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-26 13:39 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-27 15:25 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-27 17:07 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 6:41 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-29 11:26 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 11:44 ` Chris Wilson
2016-09-29 15:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-09-29 15:48 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 16:05 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-29 23:17 ` Manasi Navare
2016-10-03 23:29 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 0:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915: Remove the link rate and lane count loop in compute config Manasi Navare
2016-09-26 13:41 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-27 13:39 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-27 22:13 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-28 7:14 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-28 22:30 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-27 21:55 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-28 7:38 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-28 16:45 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-29 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-16 0:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915: Change the placement of some static functions in intel_dp.c Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 8:12 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-16 0:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Code cleanup to use dev_priv and INTEL_GEN Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 7:40 ` Mika Kahola
2016-09-26 13:45 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-28 0:03 ` Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 0:04 ` [PATCH v17 5/6] drm/i915/dp: Enable Upfront link training on DDI platforms Manasi Navare
2016-09-20 22:04 ` [PATCH v18 " Manasi Navare
2016-09-27 13:59 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 12:15 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-29 16:05 ` Jani Nikula
2016-09-16 0:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/i915/dp/mst: Add support for upfront link training for DP MST Manasi Navare
2016-09-16 0:47 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v6,1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training Patchwork
2016-09-16 19:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v7,1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training (rev2) Patchwork
2016-09-20 8:45 ` [PATCH 0/6] Remaining patches for upfront link training on DDI platforms Jani Nikula
2016-09-20 22:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v7,1/6] drm/i915: Fallback to lower link rate and lane count during link training (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160919170329.GA2172@shiv \
--to=jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).