From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
David Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatched INIT power domain disabling during suspend
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:43:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013124310.GO4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476358446-11621-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:34:06PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Currently the display INIT power domain disabling/enabling happens in a
> mismatched way in the suspend/resume_early hooks respectively. This can
> leave display power wells incorrectly disabled in the resume hook if the
> suspend sequence is aborted for some reason resulting in the
> suspend/resume hooks getting called but the suspend_late/resume_early
> hooks being skipped. In particular this change fixes "Unclaimed read
> from register 0x1e1204" on BYT/BSW triggered from i915_drm_resume()->
> intel_pps_unlock_regs_wa() when suspending with /sys/power/pm_test set
> to devices.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index e9b3bfc..5adabac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1430,8 +1430,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> dev_priv->suspend_count++;
>
> - intel_display_set_init_power(dev_priv, false);
> -
> intel_csr_ucode_suspend(dev_priv);
>
> out:
> @@ -1449,6 +1447,8 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend_late(struct drm_device *dev, bool hibernation)
>
> disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
>
> + intel_display_set_init_power(dev_priv, false);
> +
Makes sense in most cases.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> fw_csr = !IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) &&
> suspend_to_idle(dev_priv) && dev_priv->csr.dmc_payload;
However this part is quite confusing. We do the init_power_put
unconditionally, but the init_power_get is done from the init_hw()
which is conditional on this supend_to_idle special casing. So it seems
quite assymmetrical, and I can no longer claim to understand it.
> /*
> --
> 2.5.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 11:34 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix mismatched INIT power domain disabling during suspend Imre Deak
2016-10-13 12:21 ` Jani Nikula
2016-10-13 16:59 ` Imre Deak
2016-10-13 12:43 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-10-13 13:18 ` Imre Deak
2016-10-14 11:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-10-14 11:41 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013124310.GO4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.weinehall@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox