Re: gvt gem fixes

Daniel Vetter
2016-10-20T09:13:46Z

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:15:33PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2016.10.20 09:02:45 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Yeah, I think anything that touches i915 code should get merged through
> > drm-intel directly with the usual process. Only exception is when gvt has
> > a functional depency and it's a small patch, then I think we can sometimes
> > merge i915 core patches through gvt, with an ack from Jani or me (and
> > still proper review and CI and everything ofc). But that should be the
> > rare exception.
>
> That's fair enough for me. One prepared change is to fix gvt header
> issue you've listed. As it touches intel_gvt.h in i915, I'll send that
> seperately first (https://github.com/01org/gvt-linux/commit/b6a1ca7571ae45186394e555dc420481c1a9dba5)

Yes, anything touching code/files outside of the gvt/ sub-directory needs
to be submitted here to intel-gfx and go through our normal drm-intel
review process.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation