* [PATCH] drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
@ 2016-12-07 14:06 Jani Nikula
2016-12-07 14:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-12-07 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2016-12-07 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula
Pineview deserves to use its own platform enum (which was already added,
unused, previously).
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
The wrinkle here is that IS_G33() still has to match both G33 and
Pineview. I'd prefer it if G33 *only* matched G33 and *not* Pineview. To
fix this, the alternatives are to a) add an additional IS_FOO() that
matches both, or b) replaces all references to IS_G33() with IS_G33() ||
IS_PINEVIEW(). I don't like either, but I also don't like
.is_pineview. We should reserve those for feature-ish things. Or just
apply this and leave it at that. Opinions?
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 8daa4fb13b52..4236cdd25b32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -688,7 +688,6 @@ struct intel_csr {
#define DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(func) \
func(is_mobile); \
- func(is_pineview); \
func(is_lp); \
func(is_alpha_support); \
/* Keep has_* in alphabetical order */ \
@@ -2530,8 +2529,9 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
#define IS_G4X(dev_priv) (IS_G45(dev_priv) || IS_GM45(dev_priv))
#define IS_PINEVIEW_G(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0xa001)
#define IS_PINEVIEW_M(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0xa011)
-#define IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.is_pineview)
-#define IS_G33(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_G33)
+#define IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_PINEVIEW)
+#define IS_G33(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_G33 || \
+ IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv))
#define IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x0046)
#define IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_IVYBRIDGE)
#define IS_IVB_GT1(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x0156 || \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index f7ec6e944e09..93f50ef2a309 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_g33_info = {
static const struct intel_device_info intel_pineview_info = {
GEN3_FEATURES,
- .platform = INTEL_G33, .is_pineview = 1, .is_mobile = 1,
+ .platform = INTEL_PINEVIEW, .is_mobile = 1,
.has_hotplug = 1,
.has_overlay = 1,
};
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
2016-12-07 14:06 [PATCH] drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own Jani Nikula
@ 2016-12-07 14:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-12-07 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2016-12-07 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 04:06:48PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Pineview deserves to use its own platform enum (which was already added,
> unused, previously).
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> The wrinkle here is that IS_G33() still has to match both G33 and
> Pineview. I'd prefer it if G33 *only* matched G33 and *not* Pineview. To
> fix this, the alternatives are to a) add an additional IS_FOO() that
> matches both, or b) replaces all references to IS_G33() with IS_G33() ||
> IS_PINEVIEW().
This would be in line with what we did for VLV vs. CHV. So I think it
would be OK.
> I don't like either, but I also don't like
> .is_pineview. We should reserve those for feature-ish things. Or just
> apply this and leave it at that. Opinions?
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 8daa4fb13b52..4236cdd25b32 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -688,7 +688,6 @@ struct intel_csr {
>
> #define DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(func) \
> func(is_mobile); \
> - func(is_pineview); \
> func(is_lp); \
> func(is_alpha_support); \
> /* Keep has_* in alphabetical order */ \
> @@ -2530,8 +2529,9 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> #define IS_G4X(dev_priv) (IS_G45(dev_priv) || IS_GM45(dev_priv))
> #define IS_PINEVIEW_G(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0xa001)
> #define IS_PINEVIEW_M(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0xa011)
> -#define IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.is_pineview)
> -#define IS_G33(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_G33)
> +#define IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_PINEVIEW)
> +#define IS_G33(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_G33 || \
> + IS_PINEVIEW(dev_priv))
> #define IS_IRONLAKE_M(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x0046)
> #define IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.platform == INTEL_IVYBRIDGE)
> #define IS_IVB_GT1(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x0156 || \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index f7ec6e944e09..93f50ef2a309 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_g33_info = {
>
> static const struct intel_device_info intel_pineview_info = {
> GEN3_FEATURES,
> - .platform = INTEL_G33, .is_pineview = 1, .is_mobile = 1,
> + .platform = INTEL_PINEVIEW, .is_mobile = 1,
> .has_hotplug = 1,
> .has_overlay = 1,
> };
> --
> 2.1.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
2016-12-07 14:06 [PATCH] drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own Jani Nikula
2016-12-07 14:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2016-12-07 16:45 ` Patchwork
2016-12-07 18:44 ` Saarinen, Jani
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2016-12-07 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16490/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Series 16490v1 drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16490/revisions/1/mbox/
Test kms_force_connector_basic:
Subgroup force-connector-state:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2520m)
fi-bdw-5557u total:247 pass:219 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28
fi-bsw-n3050 total:247 pass:195 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:52
fi-byt-j1900 total:247 pass:206 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:41
fi-byt-n2820 total:247 pass:202 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:45
fi-hsw-4770 total:247 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
fi-hsw-4770r total:247 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
fi-ilk-650 total:247 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66
fi-ivb-3520m total:247 pass:213 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34
fi-ivb-3770 total:247 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35
fi-kbl-7500u total:247 pass:212 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35
fi-skl-6260u total:247 pass:220 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-skl-6700hq total:247 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
fi-skl-6700k total:247 pass:210 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34
fi-skl-6770hq total:247 pass:220 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-snb-2520m total:247 pass:201 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:45
fi-snb-2600 total:247 pass:201 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46
a20a4a6107256124d136c8320fc3f7adef93bb8a drm-tip: 2016y-12m-07d-15h-56m-01s UTC integration manifest
8b8c20d drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3218/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
2016-12-07 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
@ 2016-12-07 18:44 ` Saarinen, Jani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Saarinen, Jani @ 2016-12-07 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Nikula, Jani
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16490/
> State : warning
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 16490v1 drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16490/revisions/1/mbox/
>
> Test kms_force_connector_basic:
> Subgroup force-connector-state:
> pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-snb-2520m)
*ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid
=> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98625
> fi-snb-2520m total:247 pass:201 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:45
>
> a20a4a6107256124d136c8320fc3f7adef93bb8a drm-tip: 2016y-12m-07d-15h-
> 56m-01s UTC integration manifest 8b8c20d drm/i915: make Pineview a
> platform of its own
>
> == Logs ==
>
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3218/
Jani Saarinen
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-07 18:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-07 14:06 [PATCH] drm/i915: make Pineview a platform of its own Jani Nikula
2016-12-07 14:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-12-07 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-12-07 18:44 ` Saarinen, Jani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox