From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:44:33 -0700
Message-ID: <20161211124433.6136ee24@lwn.net>
References: <20161209185309.1682-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
        <20161209141514.505b018f@lwn.net>
        <CAKMK7uFtbzbe0YN5Q6awcZ4DMrn4aqiZZvLW+KHGtdb2mhGaQw@mail.gmail.com>
        <20161211081133.4c54e425@lwn.net>
        <CAKMK7uEd+3_GOH973RLyJP5OUF-=8iXubCYZqAEb6UQgJ=-jvg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEd+3_GOH973RLyJP5OUF-=8iXubCYZqAEb6UQgJ=-jvg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:35:42 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> > Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of
> > dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message?  Then the
> > rest of the set could go through your tree without touching
> > driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable
> > conflicts?  
> 
> So just patch 1 still for 4.10 through your tree? Sounds good to me.

Yeah, that will work just fine, I'll slip it in.

Thanks,

jon