From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
To: "Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
Subject: Re: ??? Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 07:47:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161216074733.GA2774@osadl.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D4F724E12AB6478FC1572B3FBE89D04C0BD765@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:29:59AM +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16900/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Series 16900v1 drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16900/revisions/1/mbox/
> >
> > Test gem_ringfill:
> > Subgroup basic-default-hang:
> > pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-4770)
> running: igt/gem_ringfill/basic-default-hang
> [117/247] skip: 8, pass: 109 /
> Build timed out (after 17 minutes). Marking the build as aborted.
>
This might be a conflict caused by the initial patch which was discssed
and then after agreeing that rather than moving to udelay() usleep:range
with som adjustments would be the right way to go.
are both patches queued now ?
I think I caused the problem by changing the subject line of the patch
while adding a V2 - because the original subject line was no longer corrct
(it noted udely) - the V2 patch is marked as "rev 1" in patchwork though.
not quite clear - anyway sorry if I made some sort of a mess here
the patch applies cleanly on next-20161216.
thx!
hofrat
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-16 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-16 1:59 [PATCH V2] drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings Nicholas Mc Guire
2016-12-16 2:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-12-16 7:29 ` Saarinen, Jani
2016-12-16 7:47 ` Nicholas Mc Guire [this message]
2016-12-16 9:27 ` ??? " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161216074733.GA2774@osadl.at \
--to=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox