From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] drm: facilitate driver unification around edid read and override
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:41:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161227184147.GC347@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1482854862.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> This series aims at three goals:
>
> 1) Most drivers do similar things around drm_get_edid (namely convert
> edid to eld, add modes, and update edid blob property). Add a helper for
> the drivers, to reduce code and unify.
I like.
> 2) Move override and firmware EDID handling to a lower level, in the
> helper. This makes them more transparent to the rest of the stack,
> avoiding special casing. For example, any drm_detect_hdmi_monitor calls
> typically use the EDID from the display, not the override EDID.
I replied to that patch, I think we need to rethink the helper callbacks
to make this work. The general direction make sense to me though.
> 3) Make EDID caching easier and unified across drivers. Currently,
> plenty of drivers have their own hacks for caching EDID reads. This
> could be made more transparent and unified at the helper level.
Caching is Real Hard, and I don't think something generic will work:
- On DP, hpd works and will reliable tell you when you need to invalidate
stuff. Except when you have a downstream port to something else (hdmi,
vga, whatever). I think this is best solved by making the shared helpers
for DP a lot better.
- HDMI is supposed to work, except it's not. You can't rely on hpd, any
caching needs to have a time limit. I guess we could share some code
here.
- Everything else is much worse, and caching is a no-go. At most a
time-based cache that invalidates and re-probes.
- Built-in panels are special.
- One issue with all this is that currently the hpd helpers we have (not
the stuff in i915) don't even forward which hpd signalled which
connector.
- Another fun is handling invalidations in general. System suspend/resume
is real fun that way ...
4) Fix the locking (well, entire lack thereof) between the probe paths
(protected by mode_config.mutex), and the atomic modeset paths (protected
by mode_config.connection_mutex).
Yes that's feature creep but I think any redesign of the probe code should
have a answer to that too.
> All of this is opt-in, using the helper from patch 6/7. This is mostly
> because converting everything at one go is pretty much impossible. The
> main wrinkle is having to leave override/firmware EDID handling in two
> places for now, but this could be fixed once enough drivers have
> switched to using the common helper.
I feel like we'd need a bit more conversion when merging, to make sure it
all makes sense. Ending up with 2 not really useful ways to handle probing
in the helpers would be worse than what we have now.
-Daniel
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> Jani Nikula (7):
> drm: reset ELD if NULL edid is passed to drm_edid_to_eld
> drm: move edid property update and add modes out of edid firmware
> loader
> drm: abstract override and firmware edid
> drm: export load edid firmware
> drm: make drm_get_displayid() available outside of drm_edid.c
> drm: add new drm_mode_connector_get_edid to do drm_get_edid and
> friends
> drm/i915: replace intel_ddc_get_modes with drm_mode_connector_get_edid
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 10 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c | 18 ++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c | 5 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c | 23 ---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 2 +-
> include/drm/drm_connector.h | 6 ++++
> include/drm/drm_edid.h | 8 +++--
> 10 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-27 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-27 16:21 [RFC PATCH 0/7] drm: facilitate driver unification around edid read and override Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] drm: reset ELD if NULL edid is passed to drm_edid_to_eld Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] drm: move edid property update and add modes out of edid firmware loader Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] drm: abstract override and firmware edid Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] drm: export load edid firmware Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] drm: make drm_get_displayid() available outside of drm_edid.c Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] drm: add new drm_mode_connector_get_edid to do drm_get_edid and friends Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 18:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-28 8:39 ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-28 9:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-27 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: replace intel_ddc_get_modes with drm_mode_connector_get_edid Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 16:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm: facilitate driver unification around edid read and override Patchwork
2016-12-27 18:41 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-12-28 9:10 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 0/7] " Daniel Vetter
2016-12-28 9:23 ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-28 9:30 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161227184147.GC347@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox