* [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
@ 2017-01-20 15:55 Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2017-01-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula
There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
drive-by cleanups while at it.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index e80d620846c8..d4557cfaf4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
- uint8_t rxdata = 0;
- int status = 0;
+ uint8_t request = 0;
+ int status;
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
if (status <= 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
goto update_status;
}
- switch (rxdata) {
+ switch (request) {
case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
default:
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
break;
}
+ if (response == DP_TEST_ACK)
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
+
update_status:
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
- DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
- &response, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
if (status <= 0)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
@ 2017-01-20 16:54 ` Patchwork
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 17:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2) Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-01-20 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/18305/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 18305v1 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/18305/revisions/1/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:246 pass:232 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-bsw-n3050 total:246 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
fi-bxt-j4205 total:246 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-bxt-t5700 total:79 pass:66 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
fi-byt-j1900 total:246 pass:219 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-byt-n2820 total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-hsw-4770 total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-hsw-4770r total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-ivb-3520m total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-ivb-3770 total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-kbl-7500u total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6260u total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-skl-6700hq total:246 pass:226 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-skl-6700k total:246 pass:222 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-snb-2520m total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-snb-2600 total:246 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
aa012aa081f6a6d2dd5a1df0f3c3736017df0d56 drm-tip: 2017y-01m-20d-09h-33m-30s UTC integration manifest
e52b416 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3561/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-01-20 17:04 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 17:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2) Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2017-01-20 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx
There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
drive-by cleanups while at it.
v2: look at the ACK bit, as the result may also contain
TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index e80d620846c8..247fbf352576 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
- uint8_t rxdata = 0;
- int status = 0;
+ uint8_t request = 0;
+ int status;
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
if (status <= 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
goto update_status;
}
- switch (rxdata) {
+ switch (request) {
case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
default:
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
break;
}
+ if (response & DP_TEST_ACK)
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
+
update_status:
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
- DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
- &response, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
if (status <= 0)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2)
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
@ 2017-01-20 17:54 ` Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-01-20 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/18305/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 18305v2 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/18305/revisions/2/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:246 pass:232 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-bsw-n3050 total:246 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
fi-bxt-j4205 total:246 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-bxt-t5700 total:79 pass:66 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
fi-byt-j1900 total:246 pass:219 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-byt-n2820 total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-hsw-4770 total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-hsw-4770r total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-ivb-3520m total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-kbl-7500u total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6260u total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-skl-6700hq total:246 pass:226 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-skl-6700k total:246 pass:222 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-snb-2520m total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-snb-2600 total:246 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
aa012aa081f6a6d2dd5a1df0f3c3736017df0d56 drm-tip: 2017y-01m-20d-09h-33m-30s UTC integration manifest
3576a31 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3563/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
@ 2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-24 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2017-01-23 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
Thanks for this patch. I have tested this on DPR 120 compliance test device
and verified that it works as expected.
Manasi
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 07:04:06PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
> proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
> drive-by cleanups while at it.
>
> v2: look at the ACK bit, as the result may also contain
> TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE
>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index e80d620846c8..247fbf352576 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
> - uint8_t rxdata = 0;
> - int status = 0;
> + uint8_t request = 0;
> + int status;
>
> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
> if (status <= 0) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
> goto update_status;
> }
>
> - switch (rxdata) {
> + switch (request) {
> case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
> break;
> case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
> break;
> case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
> break;
> case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
> break;
> default:
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
> break;
> }
>
> + if (response & DP_TEST_ACK)
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
> +
> update_status:
> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> - DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
> - &response, 1);
> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
> if (status <= 0)
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
> }
> --
> 2.1.4
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
@ 2017-01-24 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2017-01-24 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks for this patch. I have tested this on DPR 120 compliance test device
> and verified that it works as expected.
>
> Manasi
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 07:04:06PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
>> proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
>> drive-by cleanups while at it.
>>
>> v2: look at the ACK bit, as the result may also contain
>> TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Thanks for the review and testing, pushed to drm-intel-next-queued.
BR,
Jani.
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index e80d620846c8..247fbf352576 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> {
>> uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
>> - uint8_t rxdata = 0;
>> - int status = 0;
>> + uint8_t request = 0;
>> + int status;
>>
>> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
>> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
>> if (status <= 0) {
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
>> goto update_status;
>> }
>>
>> - switch (rxdata) {
>> + switch (request) {
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> default:
>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + if (response & DP_TEST_ACK)
>> + intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
>> +
>> update_status:
>> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
>> - DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
>> - &response, 1);
>> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
>> if (status <= 0)
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
>> }
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-24 14:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-24 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 17:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox