From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Get correct display clock on 945gm
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:23:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170127162336.GF31595@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170127144427.3040-1-arthur@aheymans.xyz>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 03:44:27PM +0100, Arthur Heymans wrote:
> This is according to Mobile Intel® 945 Express Chipset
> Family datasheet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 70d96162def6..c3141e40d938 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
> #define GCFGC 0xf0 /* 915+ only */
> #define GC_LOW_FREQUENCY_ENABLE (1 << 7)
> #define GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_190_200_MHZ (0 << 4)
> -#define GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_333_MHZ (4 << 4)
> +#define GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_333_320_MHZ (4 << 4)
> #define GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_267_MHZ_PNV (0 << 4)
> #define GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_333_MHZ_PNV (1 << 4)
> #define GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_444_MHZ_PNV (2 << 4)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 81c11499bcf0..307fc62e7c70 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -7389,6 +7389,26 @@ static int i945_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> return 400000;
> }
>
> +static int 945gm_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = dev->pdev;
> + u16 gcfgc = 0;
> +
> + pci_read_config_word(pdev, GCFGC, &gcfgc);
> +
> + if (gcfgc & GC_LOW_FREQUENCY_ENABLE)
> + return 133333;
> + else {
> + switch (gcfgc & GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_MASK) {
> + case GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_333_320_MHZ:
> + return 320000;
That indeed is what the docs say.
The code is tantalizingly close to the 915gm code now, so maybe
we could share it with a simple
if (IS_915GM(dev_priv))
return 320000;
else
return 333333;
?
Now if someone could figure out where to dig up the DDR and FSB clocks
we could also fix up the 190 vs. 200 MHz case...
> + default:
> + case GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_190_200_MHZ:
> + return 200000;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int i915_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> return 333333;
> @@ -7435,7 +7455,7 @@ static int i915gm_get_display_clock_speed(struct drm_device *dev)
> return 133333;
> else {
> switch (gcfgc & GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_MASK) {
> - case GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_333_MHZ:
> + case GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_333_320_MHZ:
> return 333333;
> default:
> case GC_DISPLAY_CLOCK_190_200_MHZ:
> @@ -15991,9 +16011,12 @@ void intel_init_display_hooks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> else if (IS_I915G(dev_priv))
> dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed =
> i915_get_display_clock_speed;
> - else if (IS_I945GM(dev_priv) || IS_845G(dev_priv))
> + else if (IS_845G(dev_priv))
> dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed =
> i9xx_misc_get_display_clock_speed;
> + else if (IS_I945GM(dev_priv))
> + dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed =
> + 954gm_get_display_clock_speed;
> else if (IS_I915GM(dev_priv))
> dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed =
> i915gm_get_display_clock_speed;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-27 14:44 [PATCH] drm/i915: Get correct display clock on 945gm Arthur Heymans
2017-01-27 16:23 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-01-27 16:45 ` Arthur Heymans
2017-01-27 16:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-27 17:24 ` Arthur Heymans
2017-01-27 19:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-30 9:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-27 20:15 ` kbuild test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-31 23:50 Arthur Heymans
2017-02-07 18:04 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170127162336.GF31595@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arthur@aheymans.xyz \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).