From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/atomic: Use new atomic iterator macros.
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:03:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214200307.GA22762@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1601476.niLmUVTc5O@avalon>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:55:50AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Maarten,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Monday 16 Jan 2017 10:37:40 Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
> Could we please get a description ? Apart from that,
Typed something small and merged the first 3 patches from this series.
Thanks, Daniel
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > index 18cdf2c956c6..7b61e0da9ace 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > @@ -1562,7 +1562,7 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state
> > *state)
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
> >
> > - for_each_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i) {
> > + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i) {
> > ret = drm_atomic_plane_check(plane, plane_state);
> > if (ret) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[PLANE:%d:%s] atomic core check
> failed\n",
> > @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state
> > *state) }
> > }
> >
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > ret = drm_atomic_crtc_check(crtc, crtc_state);
> > if (ret) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[CRTC:%d:%s] atomic core check
> failed\n",
> > @@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state
> > *state) ret = config->funcs->atomic_check(state->dev, state);
> >
> > if (!state->allow_modeset) {
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > if (drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state)) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[CRTC:%d:%s] requires full
> modeset\n",
> > crtc->base.id, crtc->name);
> > @@ -1668,13 +1668,13 @@ static void drm_atomic_print_state(const struct
> > drm_atomic_state *state)
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
> >
> > - for_each_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i)
> > + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i)
> > drm_atomic_plane_print_state(&p, plane_state);
> >
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i)
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i)
> > drm_atomic_crtc_print_state(&p, crtc_state);
> >
> > - for_each_connector_in_state(state, connector, connector_state, i)
> > + for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, connector_state, i)
> > drm_atomic_connector_print_state(&p, connector_state);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static int prepare_crtc_signaling(struct drm_device
> > *dev, if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > u64 __user *fence_ptr;
> >
> > fence_ptr = get_out_fence_for_crtc(crtc_state->state, crtc);
> > @@ -2041,7 +2041,7 @@ static void complete_crtc_signaling(struct drm_device
> > *dev, return;
> > }
> >
> > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > /*
> > * TEST_ONLY and PAGE_FLIP_EVENT are mutually
> > * exclusive, if they weren't, this code should be
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-14 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-16 9:37 [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/atomic: Add accessor macros for all atomic state Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/atomic: Add new iterators over all state, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-16 23:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-17 7:41 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-18 22:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-23 8:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-02-12 12:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-02-12 12:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/atomic: Make add_affected_connectors look at crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-16 23:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/atomic: Use new atomic iterator macros Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-16 23:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-02-14 20:03 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2017-02-14 20:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/atomic: Fix atomic helpers to use the new " Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-17 1:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-18 14:49 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-18 18:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/atomic: Add macros to access existing old/new state Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-17 1:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/atomic: Convert get_existing_state callers to get_old/new_state, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-17 1:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-02-16 14:37 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-17 1:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-02-16 14:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-16 9:37 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/blend: Use new atomic iterator macros Maarten Lankhorst
2017-01-17 1:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-16 11:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/atomic: Add accessor macros for all atomic state. (rev4) Patchwork
2017-01-17 0:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] drm/atomic: Add accessor macros for all atomic state Laurent Pinchart
2017-01-23 8:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-01-17 1:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-02-12 12:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170214200307.GA22762@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox