* [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
@ 2017-03-21 21:57 Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-21 22:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2017-03-21 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same thing
in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy of
the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
}
-static bool
-hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder)
-{
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
-
- pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
- if (!pll)
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
- pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
-
- return pll;
-}
-
-static bool
-skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder)
-{
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
-
- pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
- if (pll == NULL) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
- pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
- return false;
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
-static bool
-bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder)
-{
- return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
-}
-
/*
* Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
* intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
@@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev);
struct intel_encoder *encoder =
intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
+ struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
- if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
- return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
- else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
- return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
- else
- return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
+ pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
+ if (!pll)
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
+ pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
+
+ return pll;
}
void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-21 21:57 [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
@ 2017-03-21 22:16 ` Patchwork
2017-03-21 23:05 ` [PATCH] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-03-22 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-21 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21639/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 21639v1 drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/21639/revisions/1/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 time: 460s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time: 584s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time: 537s
fi-bxt-t5700 total:278 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time: 549s
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time: 504s
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:247 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 time: 505s
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 444s
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 440s
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time: 439s
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 516s
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 486s
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 483s
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 476s
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17 time: 594s
fi-skl-6700k total:278 pass:256 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 490s
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 517s
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time: 559s
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time: 421s
d17b31b3444ecffa68be0c331a4b20078fd10ccf drm-tip: 2017y-03m-21d-17h-36m-49s UTC integration manifest
f9a09b3 drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4254/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-21 21:57 [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-21 22:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-03-21 23:05 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-03-22 17:33 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran @ 2017-03-21 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zanoni, Paulo R; +Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 18:57 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same thing
> in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy of
> the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> }
>
> -static bool
> -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> -
> - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
I have a related question, not a patch review :) Looks like we care only
about the boolean returned from intel_get_shared_dpll(). Could not find
any caller that uses the returned 'struct intel_shared_dpll *'. Should
it's signature be simply changed to return a bool?
-DK
> - if (!pll)
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> -
> - return pll;
> -}
> -
> -static bool
> -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> -
> - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
> - if (pll == NULL) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static bool
> -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev);
> struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
>
> - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> - else
> - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
> + if (!pll)
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> +
> + return pll;
> }
>
> void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-21 21:57 [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-21 22:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-21 23:05 ` [PATCH] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
@ 2017-03-22 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-22 17:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-03-22 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:57:10PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same thing
> in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy of
> the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> }
>
> -static bool
> -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> -
> - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> - if (!pll)
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> -
> - return pll;
> -}
> -
> -static bool
> -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> -
> - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
> - if (pll == NULL) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static bool
> -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev);
> struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
>
> - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> - else
> - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> - encoder);
> + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
I wonder if intel_ddi_pll_select() has any good reason to even exist
anymore. It's just calling this one function, so maybe we should just
call it directly?
> + if (!pll)
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> +
> + return pll;
I would probably write 'pll != NULL' for a bit of extra clarity.
Either way
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> }
>
> void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-21 23:05 ` [PATCH] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
@ 2017-03-22 17:33 ` Paulo Zanoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2017-03-22 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pandiyan, Dhinakaran; +Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Em Ter, 2017-03-21 às 23:05 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran escreveu:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 18:57 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same
> > thing
> > in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy
> > of
> > the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------
> > ------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct
> > intel_encoder *encoder,
> > bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool
> > -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > -
> > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
>
> I have a related question, not a patch review :) Looks like we care
> only
> about the boolean returned from intel_get_shared_dpll(). Could not
> find
> any caller that uses the returned 'struct intel_shared_dpll *'.
> Should
> it's signature be simply changed to return a bool?
There are only two callers. It would be possible to change the
signature, although I don't see many benefits from doing it now.
Perhaps it would be better to unify the error handling.
>
> -DK
> >
> > - if (!pll)
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > -
> > - return pll;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static bool
> > -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > -
> > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > - if (pll == NULL) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static bool
> > -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > -}
> > -
> > /*
> > * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> > * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> > @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc
> > *intel_crtc,
> > bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > {
> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc-
> > >base.dev);
> > struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> > intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> >
> > - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> > - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - else
> > - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > + if (!pll)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > +
> > + return pll;
> > }
> >
> > void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-22 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2017-03-22 17:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 17:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2017-03-22 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx
Em Qua, 2017-03-22 às 15:21 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:57:10PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same
> > thing
> > in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy
> > of
> > the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------
> > ------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct
> > intel_encoder *encoder,
> > bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool
> > -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > -
> > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - if (!pll)
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > -
> > - return pll;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static bool
> > -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > -
> > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > - if (pll == NULL) {
> > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return true;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static bool
> > -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > -{
> > - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
> > -}
> > -
> > /*
> > * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> > * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> > @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc
> > *intel_crtc,
> > bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > {
> > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc-
> > >base.dev);
> > struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> > intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> >
> > - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> > - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > - else
> > - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > - encoder);
> > + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > encoder);
>
> I wonder if intel_ddi_pll_select() has any good reason to even exist
> anymore. It's just calling this one function, so maybe we should just
> call it directly?
You're right here. Then the two callers would be
haswell_crtc_compute_clock() and ironlake_crtc_compute_clock(), which
makes even more sene. I'll submit another patch.
>
> >
> > + if (!pll)
> > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > %c\n",
> > + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > +
> > + return pll;
>
> I would probably write 'pll != NULL' for a bit of extra clarity.
Are you talking about the return statement or the if condition?
I'll assume you're talking about the return statement. I can fix this.
Another thing would be "return !!pll". I'm fine with all approaches.
>
> Either way
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Thanks!
>
> >
> > }
> >
> > void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-22 17:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
@ 2017-03-22 17:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paulo Zanoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-03-22 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:40:01PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Qua, 2017-03-22 às 15:21 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:57:10PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > >
> > > Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same
> > > thing
> > > in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy
> > > of
> > > the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------
> > > ------------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > > index d8214ba..bd6fd0b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > > @@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct
> > > intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static bool
> > > -hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > > -{
> > > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > > -
> > > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > - encoder);
> > > - if (!pll)
> > > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > > %c\n",
> > > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > > -
> > > - return pll;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static bool
> > > -skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > > -{
> > > - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > > -
> > > - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > encoder);
> > > - if (pll == NULL) {
> > > - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > > %c\n",
> > > - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > > - return false;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return true;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static bool
> > > -bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > > - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > > -{
> > > - return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > encoder);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> > > * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> > > @@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc
> > > *intel_crtc,
> > > bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > > struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > > {
> > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc-
> > > >base.dev);
> > > struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> > > intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> > > + struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> > >
> > > - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> > > - return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > - encoder);
> > > - else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> > > - return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > - encoder);
> > > - else
> > > - return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > - encoder);
> > > + pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
> > > encoder);
> >
> > I wonder if intel_ddi_pll_select() has any good reason to even exist
> > anymore. It's just calling this one function, so maybe we should just
> > call it directly?
>
> You're right here. Then the two callers would be
> haswell_crtc_compute_clock() and ironlake_crtc_compute_clock(), which
> makes even more sene. I'll submit another patch.
>
> >
> > >
> > > + if (!pll)
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe
> > > %c\n",
> > > + pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> > > +
> > > + return pll;
> >
> > I would probably write 'pll != NULL' for a bit of extra clarity.
>
> Are you talking about the return statement or the if condition?
The return.
>
> I'll assume you're talking about the return statement. I can fix this.
> Another thing would be "return !!pll". I'm fine with all approaches.
For whatever reason I've started to prefer !=NULL type of stuff.
Not really sure why since I used to dislike it when I was younger.
>
> >
> > Either way
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > > *crtc_state)
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-22 17:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
@ 2017-03-22 18:58 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: kill intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2017-03-22 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
Because {hsw,skl,bxt}_ddi_pll_select all pretty much do the same thing
in slightly different ways. Replace everything with a simple copy of
the function and inline it inside intle_ddi_pll_select().
v2: s/return pll/return pll != NULL/ (Ville)
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 58 +++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index d8214ba..08a810d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -1127,47 +1127,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
}
-static bool
-hsw_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder)
-{
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
-
- pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
- if (!pll)
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
- pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
-
- return pll;
-}
-
-static bool
-skl_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder)
-{
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
-
- pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
- if (pll == NULL) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
- pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
- return false;
- }
-
- return true;
-}
-
-static bool
-bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- struct intel_encoder *encoder)
-{
- return !!intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
-}
-
/*
* Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
* intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
@@ -1178,19 +1137,16 @@ bxt_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev);
struct intel_encoder *encoder =
intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
+ struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
- if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
- return skl_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
- else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
- return bxt_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
- else
- return hsw_ddi_pll_select(intel_crtc, crtc_state,
- encoder);
+ pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
+ if (!pll)
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
+ pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
+
+ return pll != NULL;
}
void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: kill intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paulo Zanoni
@ 2017-03-22 18:58 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 19:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Zanoni @ 2017-03-22 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Paulo Zanoni
All it does is pick the encoder and call intel_get_shared_dpll(). We
can just do this in the caller. One less indirection level during code
reading.
As another plus, now the two callers of intel_get_shared_dpll() are
{ironlake,haswell}_crtc_compute_clock().
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 25 ++-----------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
To be honest I'm not super sure if this change is an improvement. I like keeping
DDI-related code in intel_ddi.c. I'll let you guys decide with the
upvote/downvote buttons in your email clients.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index 08a810d..3fbe498 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ intel_ddi_get_crtc_encoder(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
return ret;
}
-static struct intel_encoder *
+/* Finds the only possible encoder associated with the given CRTC. */
+struct intel_encoder *
intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
@@ -1127,28 +1128,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
}
-/*
- * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
- * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
- *
- * For private DPLLs, compute_config() should do the selection for us. This
- * function should be folded into compute_config() eventually.
- */
-bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
-{
- struct intel_encoder *encoder =
- intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
-
- pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
- if (!pll)
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
- pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
-
- return pll != NULL;
-}
-
void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 010e5dd..9cdf9b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -8862,8 +8862,14 @@ static int haswell_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
if (!intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI)) {
- if (!intel_ddi_pll_select(crtc, crtc_state))
+ struct intel_encoder *encoder =
+ intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
+
+ if (!intel_get_shared_dpll(crtc, crtc_state, encoder)) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
+ pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
crtc->lowfreq_avail = false;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 51228fe..ad7bdf5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1236,8 +1236,8 @@ void intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder);
void intel_ddi_enable_pipe_clock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_ddi_disable_pipe_clock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
-bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+struct intel_encoder *
+intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
void intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
bool intel_ddi_connector_get_hw_state(struct intel_connector *intel_connector);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: kill intel_ddi_pll_select()
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: kill intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
@ 2017-03-22 19:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-03-22 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Zanoni; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:58:45PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> All it does is pick the encoder and call intel_get_shared_dpll(). We
> can just do this in the caller. One less indirection level during code
> reading.
>
> As another plus, now the two callers of intel_get_shared_dpll() are
> {ironlake,haswell}_crtc_compute_clock().
>
> Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 25 ++-----------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
>
> To be honest I'm not super sure if this change is an improvement. I like keeping
> DDI-related code in intel_ddi.c. I'll let you guys decide with the
> upvote/downvote buttons in your email clients.
I guess the thing that sort of ruins is the
intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder() call. First I thought we could nuke
that by using output_types instead of encoder->type, but looks like
BXT wants to disagree with us and really requires the encoder in
.get_dpll() :(
Oh well, we trade one ddi thing for another. Although
intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder() doesn't really have anything truly ddi
specific in it so we could even move it elsewhere or even just inline it
in .compute_clock() since it's not even called from anywhere else.
I do like the fact that there's at least one less hoop to jump
through when tracing through the code. So this works for me.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 08a810d..3fbe498 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ intel_ddi_get_crtc_encoder(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static struct intel_encoder *
> +/* Finds the only possible encoder associated with the given CRTC. */
> +struct intel_encoder *
> intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> @@ -1127,28 +1128,6 @@ void intel_ddi_clock_get(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> bxt_ddi_clock_get(encoder, pipe_config);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Tries to find a *shared* PLL for the CRTC and store it in
> - * intel_crtc->ddi_pll_sel.
> - *
> - * For private DPLLs, compute_config() should do the selection for us. This
> - * function should be folded into compute_config() eventually.
> - */
> -bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> -{
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> - intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> - struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> -
> - pll = intel_get_shared_dpll(intel_crtc, crtc_state, encoder);
> - if (!pll)
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> - pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));
> -
> - return pll != NULL;
> -}
> -
> void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 010e5dd..9cdf9b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -8862,8 +8862,14 @@ static int haswell_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> if (!intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI)) {
> - if (!intel_ddi_pll_select(crtc, crtc_state))
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> + intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(crtc_state);
> +
> + if (!intel_get_shared_dpll(crtc, crtc_state, encoder)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to find PLL for pipe %c\n",
> + pipe_name(crtc->pipe));
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> crtc->lowfreq_avail = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 51228fe..ad7bdf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1236,8 +1236,8 @@ void intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder);
> void intel_ddi_enable_pipe_clock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_ddi_disable_pipe_clock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> -bool intel_ddi_pll_select(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +struct intel_encoder *
> +intel_ddi_get_crtc_new_encoder(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_ddi_set_pipe_settings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> void intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> bool intel_ddi_connector_get_hw_state(struct intel_connector *intel_connector);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-22 19:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-21 21:57 [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-21 22:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-03-21 23:05 ` [PATCH] " Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-03-22 17:33 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 13:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-22 17:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 17:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 18:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: kill intel_ddi_pll_select() Paulo Zanoni
2017-03-22 19:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).