[PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: Fix the t11_t12 panel power cycle delay from VBT read

* [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: Fix the t11_t12 panel power cycle delay from VBT read
@ 2017-06-22 16:43 Manasi Navare
  2017-06-22 16:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
  2017-06-22 18:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2017-06-22 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

When we read the VBT t11_t12 value for panel power cycle delay,
it is a zero based value so we need to 100ms to that. And then it
needs to be multiplied by 10 to store it in 100usecs unit same as
SW VBT.

v2:
* Change the VBT value instead of HW readout and pp div (Ville Syrjala)
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index bca4ac1..be9e17a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -5234,6 +5234,11 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
 	intel_pps_dump_state("cur", &cur);
 
 	vbt = dev_priv->vbt.edp.pps;
+	/* T11_T12 delay is special and actually in units of 100ms, but zero
+	 * based in the hw (so we need to add 100 ms). But the sw vbt
+	 * table multiplies it with 1000 to make it in units of 100usec,
+	 * too. */
+	vbt.t11_t12 += 100 * 10;
 
 	/* Upper limits from eDP 1.3 spec. Note that we use the clunky units of
 	 * our hw here, which are all in 100usec. */
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread