From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Add perf property support
 for context HW id
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:26:27 +0800
Message-ID: <20170725042627.3lam656etitdiq4v@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com>
References: <20170719053949.31396-1-zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
 <150063504528.29280.3933216558027843338@mail.alporthouse.com>
 <f3c151f1-0421-6275-b5eb-e8152a8c5f57@intel.com>
Reply-To: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0196274343=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <f3c151f1-0421-6275-b5eb-e8152a8c5f57@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Jiao Pengyuan <pengyuan.jiao@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org


--===============0196274343==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7jnhpfikww57utur"
Content-Disposition: inline


--7jnhpfikww57utur
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2017.07.21 14:01:01 +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> I think Chris' comments show this isn't actually tested.

It turned out that's true...so currently Pengyuan just tried to
filter by exposed vGPU ctx_hw_id with global mode in gputop. Would
that be ok with you? If yes, then we don't need i915 perf change.

--=20
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827

--7jnhpfikww57utur
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQTXuabgHDW6LPt9CICxBBozTXgYJwUCWXbIcwAKCRCxBBozTXgY
J6EXAJ9M/pCxr/fHjYdbbrWQzaJ/tqXEqgCeIAZ9WSNfv9419B6LGKoFe9jUV8k=
=ZJQY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7jnhpfikww57utur--

--===============0196274343==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSW50ZWwtZ2Z4
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApJbnRlbC1nZnhAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaW50ZWwtZ2Z4Cg==

--===============0196274343==--