intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock"
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 18:58:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170904155812.GF4914@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a001c2c-008e-dc89-ffad-76f732889bfd@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 31-08-17 om 20:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:57:03PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Make the min_pixclk thing less confusing by changing it to track
> >> the minimum acceptable cdclk frequency instead. This means moving
> >> the application of the guardbands to a slightly higher level from
> >> the low level platform specific calc_cdclk() functions.
> >>
> >> The immediate benefit is elimination of the confusing 2x factors
> >> on GLK/CNL+ in the audio workarounds (which stems from the fact
> >> that the pipes produce two pixels per clock).
> >>
> >> v2: Keep cdclk higher on CNL to workaround missing DDI clock voltage handling
> >> v3: Squash with the CNL cdclk limits patch (DK)
> >> v4: s/intel_min_cdclk/intel_pixel_rate_to_cdclk/ (DK)
> >>
> >> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > I didn't get any objections from the CNL camp, so I went ahead and
> > pushed the series. Thanks for the reviews.
> >
> I seem to have a WARN_ON during init now on my broadwell, likely related to this series?
> 
> [   13.105310] i915 0000:00:02.0: vgaarb: changed VGA decodes: olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
> [   13.132264] systemd-journald[159]: Successfully sent stream file descriptor to service manager.
> [   13.161016] WARN_ON(min_cdclk < 0)

Hmm. I think I need to see the full dmesg to figure this one out.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-04 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-10 19:33 [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock" ville.syrjala
2017-07-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Consolidate max_cdclk_freq check in intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk() ville.syrjala
2017-07-11 20:21   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-07-12 10:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-07-10 19:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v3,1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock" Patchwork
2017-07-11  9:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-07-11 13:00   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-07-11 20:35     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-08-30 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 " ville.syrjala
2017-08-31 18:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-04 10:39     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-09-04 15:58       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-09-04 18:51         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-09-05 12:58           ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-08-31 11:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v4,1/2] drm/i915: Track minimum acceptable cdclk instead of "minimum dotclock" (rev2) Patchwork
2017-08-31 15:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170904155812.GF4914@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).