From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [-PATCH v5 1/5] drm/i915: update cursors asynchronously through atomic
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 18:04:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170908210404.GA23204@jade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150490013655.23880.15812699019398253302@mail.alporthouse.com>
2017-09-08 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>:
> Quoting Gustavo Padovan (2017-09-08 20:24:15)
> > @@ -13167,6 +13170,26 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * The atomic async update fast path takes care
> > + * of avoiding the vblank waits for simple cursor
> > + * movement and flips. For cursor on/off and size changes,
> > + * we want to perform the vblank waits so that watermark
> > + * updates happen during the correct frames. Gen9+ have
> > + * double buffered watermarks and so shouldn't need this.
> > + */
> > + if (state->async_update) {
> > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> This deadlock should be found by the test suite, or else we are missing
> tests!
It seems that I missed the fact that the driver changed when I rebased and
resent. I'll investigate this further and come back with another patch.
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-08 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-08 19:24 [-PATCH v5 1/5] drm/i915: update cursors asynchronously through atomic Gustavo Padovan
2017-09-08 19:24 ` [-PATCH v5 2/5] drm/i915: remove intel_cursor_plane_funcs Gustavo Padovan
2017-09-08 19:48 ` [-PATCH v5 1/5] drm/i915: update cursors asynchronously through atomic Chris Wilson
2017-09-08 21:04 ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170908210404.GA23204@jade \
--to=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox