From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove intel_dp->is_mst check in intel_dp_check_mst_status
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:31:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170913133157.GL4914@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170912235730.3492-5-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:57:26PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> There is just only one caller now, which already checks for
> intel_dp->is_mst. So, remove this and fix some braces while at it.
Hmm. So this depends on the subtle detail that
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume() will "fail" if didn't enable mst
prior to calling it. That fact isn't obvious at all, so I would
suggest noting that in the commit message at least (maybe we should
even have a comment in the code?)
I'm assuming there are not other changes beyond just dropping the
top level 'if (mst) { }' thing? This is one reason I prefer flat code.
If the function had been flat to begin with the diff would have
actually turned out legible. IIRC I even posted a flattening patch at
some point but I guess it didn't go in. I would suggest that you take
the opportunity to flatten out the rest of this function while you
in the neighbourhood.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index b3d95cb7546b..3f2ca10ccbcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4192,57 +4192,56 @@ static int
> intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> bool bret;
> + u8 esi[DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN] = { 0 };
> + int ret = 0;
> + int retry;
> + bool handled;
>
> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> - u8 esi[DP_DPRX_ESI_LEN] = { 0 };
> - int ret = 0;
> - int retry;
> - bool handled;
> - bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi);
> + bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi);
> go_again:
> - if (bret == true) {
> -
> - /* check link status - esi[10] = 0x200c */
> - if (intel_dp->active_mst_links &&
> - !drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(&esi[10], intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("channel EQ not ok, retraining\n");
> - intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
> - intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
> - }
> + if (bret == true) {
> +
> + /* check link status - esi[10] = 0x200c */
> + if (intel_dp->active_mst_links &&
> + !drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(&esi[10], intel_dp->lane_count)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("channel EQ not ok, retraining\n");
> + intel_dp_start_link_train(intel_dp);
> + intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
> + }
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got esi %3ph\n", esi);
> - ret = drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, esi, &handled);
> -
> - if (handled) {
> - for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> - int wret;
> - wret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> - DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI+1,
> - &esi[1], 3);
> - if (wret == 3) {
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got esi %3ph\n", esi);
> + ret = drm_dp_mst_hpd_irq(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, esi, &handled);
>
> - bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi);
> - if (bret == true) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got esi2 %3ph\n", esi);
> - goto go_again;
> - }
> - } else
> - ret = 0;
> + if (handled) {
> + for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> + int wret;
>
> - return ret;
> + wret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> + DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI+1,
> + &esi[1], 3);
> + if (wret == 3)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi);
> + if (bret == true) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("got esi2 %3ph\n", esi);
> + goto go_again;
> + }
> } else {
> - struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ESI - device may have failed\n");
> - intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> - drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_dp->is_mst);
> - /* send a hotplug event */
> - drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + ret = 0;
> }
> + } else {
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ESI - device may have failed\n");
> + intel_dp->is_mst = false;
> + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> + intel_dp->is_mst);
> + drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(intel_dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void
> --
> 2.11.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-12 23:57 [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/mst: Debug log connector name in destroy_connector() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/mst: Print active mst links after update Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-14 20:58 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dp: Fix buffer size for sink_irq_esi read Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-14 21:10 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dp: Avoid more dpcd transactions after resume failure Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-13 13:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-13 20:21 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove intel_dp->is_mst check in intel_dp_check_mst_status Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-13 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2017-09-13 20:13 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-13 13:31 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-09-13 20:33 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dp: Handle check_mst_status() failure in one place Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-14 21:32 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-14 21:52 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/dp: Avoid double-printing esi regs Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-14 20:42 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/dp: Protect link training with connection mutex Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-14 22:26 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-15 18:16 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-15 18:38 ` Manasi Navare
2017-09-15 18:57 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-15 10:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-18 21:50 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-19 12:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-19 19:21 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-12 23:57 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dp: Remove redundant can_mst checks in intel_dp_configure_mst() Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2017-09-14 22:36 ` Ausmus, James
2017-09-15 18:29 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-09-13 0:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915/mst: Debug log connector name in destroy_connector() Patchwork
2017-09-14 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/9] " Ausmus, James
2017-09-14 19:22 ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170913133157.GL4914@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox