public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't rmw PIPESTAT enable bits
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:05:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170925140551.GB10981@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170915100336.GJ4914@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 01:03:36PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 09:37:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Ville Syrjala (2017-09-14 16:17:31)
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > i830 seems to occasionally forget the PIPESTAT enable bits when
> > > we read the register. These aren't the only registers on i830 that
> > > have problems with RMW, as reading the double buffered plane
> > > registers returns the latched value rather than the last written
> > > value. So something similar is perhaps going on with PIPESTAT.
> > > 
> > > This corruption results on vblank interrupts occasionally turning off
> > > on their own, which leads to vblank timeouts and generally a stuck
> > > display subsystem.
> > > 
> > > So let's not RMW the pipestat enable bits, and instead use the cached
> > > copy we have around.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Well it didn't make my 845g any worse. Still has
> > 
> > [  245.683349] [drm:pipe_config_err] *ERROR* mismatch in base.adjusted_mode.flags (2) (expected 0, found 2)
> > [  245.683382] [drm:pipe_config_err] *ERROR* mismatch in base.adjusted_mode.flags (8) (expected 0, found 8)
> > [  245.683427] pipe state doesn't match!
> > 
> > if you are interested.
> 
> That's a bit odd. Even if the mode originally doesn't have any
> hsync/vsync flags intel_modeset_pipe_config() should give it some.
> So I can't immediately see how we could manage to get there with
> expected==0.

Hmm. Does you 845g have DVO encoders? That could potentially explain if
it ends up using intel_crtc_mode_get(). That one fails to read out the
sync flags correctly, and it has other issues as well.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/5183/ but not sure it applies
cleanly anymore.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-25 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-14 15:17 [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't rmw PIPESTAT enable bits Ville Syrjala
2017-09-14 16:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-09-14 20:37 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2017-09-15 10:03   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-09-25 14:05     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-09-25 14:10       ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-14 21:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-09-25 10:33 ` [PATCH] " Imre Deak
2017-09-25 13:53   ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170925140551.GB10981@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox