* [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE
@ 2017-10-09 16:33 Ville Syrjala
2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjala @ 2017-10-09 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644
--- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
+++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode)
memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
- wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
+ wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala @ 2017-10-09 16:33 ` Ville Syrjala 2017-10-09 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: " Patchwork ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjala @ 2017-10-09 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-gfx From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0 doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> --- tests/kms_flip.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c index acec95f0de72..9a96566edb67 100644 --- a/tests/kms_flip.c +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c @@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ static void calibrate_ts(struct test_output *o, int crtc_idx) memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait)); wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx); - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait)); last_seq = wait.reply.sequence; -- 2.13.5 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala 2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala @ 2017-10-09 19:01 ` Patchwork 2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-09 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31600/ State : failure == Summary == IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build f1e77e83d620f66f98401854a63b93dc4cead880 tests/kms_draw_crc: Skip tests for unsupported formats with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3197 18b15be401ec drm-tip: 2017y-10m-09d-17h-21m-07s UTC integration manifest No testlist changes. Test gem_exec_suspend: Subgroup basic-s3: pass -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#103039 Subgroup basic-s4-devices: pass -> DMESG-FAIL (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#102846 +1 Test gem_flink_basic: Subgroup bad-flink: pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-kbl-7560u) fdo#103049 +4 Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a: pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-kbl-r) fdo#103039 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103039 fdo#102846 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102846 fdo#103049 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103049 fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:457s fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:474s fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:392s fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:580s fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:288s fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:531s fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:526s fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:538s fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:510s fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:256 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:556s fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:633s fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:435s fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:601s fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:441s fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:419s fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:467s fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:498s fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:474s fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:511s fi-kbl-7560u total:125 pass:105 dwarn:5 dfail:2 fail:0 skip:12 fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:265 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:491s fi-kbl-r total:245 pass:220 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:661s fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:482s fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:655s fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:517s fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:472s fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:584s fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:445s == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_307/ _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala 2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala 2017-10-09 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: " Patchwork @ 2017-10-10 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-10-10 19:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork 2017-10-11 4:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 4 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-10-10 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjala; +Cc: intel-gfx On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0 > doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > --- > tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c > index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644 > --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c > +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode) > > memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait)); > wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx); > - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; > + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; Looking at drm_wait_vblank_is_query() in drm_vblank.c you also want to drop NEXTONMISS. With that: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> on both. Cheers, Daniel > do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait)); > > last_seq = wait.reply.sequence; > -- > 2.13.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter @ 2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-10-10 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-10-10 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0 > > doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c > > index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644 > > --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c > > +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c > > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode) > > > > memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait)); > > wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx); > > - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; > > + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; > > Looking at drm_wait_vblank_is_query() in drm_vblank.c you also want to > drop NEXTONMISS. Hmm. I think we may want to line things up to a vblank boundary here (but I'd have to re-read the code to confirm that). Without the NEXTONMISS we would just query the current count and continue immediately. Alternative I guess we could drop the NEXTONMISS but instead wait for seq+1. > With that: > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> on both. > > Cheers, Daniel > > do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait)); > > > > last_seq = wait.reply.sequence; > > -- > > 2.13.5 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä @ 2017-10-10 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-10-10 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:24:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0 > > > doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > > tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c > > > index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644 > > > --- a/tests/kms_setmode.c > > > +++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c > > > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const drmModeModeInfo *kmode) > > > > > > memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait)); > > > wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx); > > > - wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; > > > + wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS; > > > > Looking at drm_wait_vblank_is_query() in drm_vblank.c you also want to > > drop NEXTONMISS. > > Hmm. I think we may want to line things up to a vblank boundary here > (but I'd have to re-read the code to confirm that). Without the > NEXTONMISS we would just query the current count and continue > immediately. Alternative I guess we could drop the NEXTONMISS but > instead wait for seq+1. NEXTONMISS means you don't actually query, but wait until that vblank happened (as a blocking ioctl, you only get the event when asking for it). I didn't really look into what the tests wants, just went with your description of what you want to do ... -Daniel > > > With that: > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> on both. > > > > Cheers, Daniel > > > do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait)); > > > > > > last_seq = wait.reply.sequence; > > > -- > > > 2.13.5 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > > -- > > Daniel Vetter > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > > http://blog.ffwll.ch > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter @ 2017-10-10 19:44 ` Patchwork 2017-10-11 4:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-10 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31600/ State : success == Summary == IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build d7c88290ab6a8393dc341b30c7fb5e27d2952901 syncobj: Add a test for SYNCOBJ_CREATE_SIGNALED with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3207 d82f454de90a drm-tip: 2017y-10m-10d-18h-40m-34s UTC integration manifest No testlist changes. Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-byt-j1900) fdo#101705 +1 fdo#101705 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101705 fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:453s fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:471s fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:396s fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:563s fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:287s fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:533s fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:532s fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:537s fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:524s fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:253 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:563s fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:629s fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:435s fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:600s fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:442s fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:419s fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:465s fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:506s fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:476s fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:507s fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:581s fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:265 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:485s fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:594s fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:668s fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:474s fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:658s fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:534s fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:516s fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:472s fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:576s fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:435s == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_316/ _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE 2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2017-10-10 19:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork @ 2017-10-11 4:52 ` Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-11 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/31600/ State : success == Summary == Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Subgroup fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render: dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#102886 +3 Test kms_flip: Subgroup flip-vs-absolute-wf_vblank-interruptible: fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#100368 Test kms_setmode: Subgroup basic: fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#99912 fdo#102886 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102886 fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368 fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912 shard-hsw total:2552 pass:1432 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:12 skip:1103 time:9622s == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_316/shards.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-11 4:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-10-09 16:33 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/kms_setmode: Request the intiial vbl count with RELATIVE instead of ABSOLUTE Ville Syrjala 2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_flip: " Ville Syrjala 2017-10-09 19:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] tests/kms_setmode: " Patchwork 2017-10-10 9:16 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Daniel Vetter 2017-10-10 9:24 ` Ville Syrjälä 2017-10-10 12:25 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-10-10 19:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork 2017-10-11 4:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox