From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:50:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018215059.woevjoyzig7rf4sb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018204825.2500-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:48:24PM +0000, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk state
> on CNL. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value since
> there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume that
> it worked.
+static u32 cnl_cur_voltage(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+ u32 voltage;
+ sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, &voltage);
+ return voltage;
+}
+
static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
{
@@ -1486,8 +1493,7 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
cdclk_state->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_state->vco, div);
+ cdclk_state->voltage = cnl_cur_voltage(dev_priv);
}
static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -1594,8 +1600,7 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
+ dev_priv->cdclk.hw.voltage = cnl_cur_voltage(dev_priv);
>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index 1b4dcd9689da..795a18f64c4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1505,6 +1505,19 @@ static int cnl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk)
> return 168000;
> }
>
> +static u8 cnl_calc_voltage(int cdclk)
> +{
> + switch (cdclk) {
> + default:
> + case 168000:
> + return 0;
> + case 336000:
> + return 1;
> + case 528000:
> + return 2;
> + }
> +}
where is the port_clock taking into account?
> +
> static void cnl_cdclk_pll_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> {
> @@ -1538,7 +1551,7 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->ref;
>
> if (cdclk_state->vco == 0)
> - return;
> + goto out;
>
> divider = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL) & BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK;
>
> @@ -1555,6 +1568,13 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> cdclk_state->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_state->vco, div);
> +
> + out:
> + /*
> + * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
> + * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
> + */
> + cdclk_state->voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state->cdclk);
> }
>
> static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -1595,7 +1615,7 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> {
> int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> - u32 val, divider, pcu_ack;
> + u32 val, divider;
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> @@ -1624,19 +1644,6 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> break;
> }
>
> - switch (cdclk) {
> - case 528000:
> - pcu_ack = 2;
> - break;
> - case 336000:
> - pcu_ack = 1;
> - break;
> - case 168000:
> - default:
> - pcu_ack = 0;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> @@ -1654,7 +1661,8 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> /* inform PCU of the change */
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> - sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, pcu_ack);
> + sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> + cdclk_state->voltage);
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
>
> intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> @@ -1747,6 +1755,7 @@ void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> cdclk_state.cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> cdclk_state.vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv, cdclk_state.cdclk);
> + cdclk_state.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> }
> @@ -1764,6 +1773,7 @@ void cnl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> cdclk_state.cdclk = cdclk_state.ref;
> cdclk_state.vco = 0;
> + cdclk_state.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
>
> cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> }
> @@ -2081,6 +2091,7 @@ static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> + intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
>
> if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> @@ -2088,6 +2099,7 @@ static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> + intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> } else {
> intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> --
> 2.13.6
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 20:48 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Clean up some cdclk switch statements Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 7:20 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Start tracking voltage level in the cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 14:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 12:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 17:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: USe cdclk_state->voltage on VLV/CHV Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: Use " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BDW Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:44 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on SKL/KBL/CFL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BXT/GLK Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 21:50 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2017-10-18 22:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-19 10:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 10:56 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-19 12:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 23:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 18:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Adjust system agent voltage on CNL if required by DDI ports Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:54 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:48 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-20 20:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 21:44 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-23 12:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 11:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 14:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-23 18:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 21:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Patchwork
2017-10-19 17:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 18:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-19 18:52 ` Patchwork
2017-10-19 20:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2017-10-19 23:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-20 0:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-20 16:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev3) Patchwork
2017-10-20 17:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev6) Patchwork
2017-10-20 19:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171018215059.woevjoyzig7rf4sb@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox