public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on SKL/KBL/CFL
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:18:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171020111812.GD10981@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019234708.bmwdladlcaa4gwax@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 04:47:08PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:48:22PM +0000, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk state
> > on SKL/KBL/CFL. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value since
> > there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume that
> > it worked.
> > 
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > index 7442e9443ffa..6f7b5abe6e3f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -789,6 +789,24 @@ static int skl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk, int vco)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static u8 skl_calc_voltage(int cdclk)
> > +{
> > +	switch (cdclk) {
> > +	default:
> > +	case 308571:
> > +	case 337500:
> > +		return 0;
> > +	case 450000:
> > +	case 432000:
> > +		return 1;
> > +	case 540000:
> > +		return 2;
> > +	case 617143:
> > +	case 675000:
> > +		return 3;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void skl_dpll0_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			     struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> >  {
> > @@ -839,7 +857,7 @@ static void skl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->ref;
> >  
> >  	if (cdclk_state->vco == 0)
> > -		return;
> > +		goto out;
> 
> why do we need this case?

Mainly just to make sure the entire state is consistent.

> 
> >  
> >  	cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> >  
> > @@ -880,6 +898,13 @@ static void skl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > +
> > + out:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
> > +	 * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
> > +	 */
> > +	cdclk_state->voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state->cdclk);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* convert from kHz to .1 fixpoint MHz with -1MHz offset */
> > @@ -964,7 +989,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  {
> >  	int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> >  	int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> > -	u32 freq_select, pcu_ack;
> > +	u32 freq_select;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > @@ -988,21 +1013,17 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  	case 308571:
> >  	case 337500:
> >  		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308;
> > -		pcu_ack = 0;
> >  		break;
> >  	case 450000:
> >  	case 432000:
> >  		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_450_432;
> > -		pcu_ack = 1;
> >  		break;
> >  	case 540000:
> >  		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_540;
> > -		pcu_ack = 2;
> >  		break;
> >  	case 617143:
> >  	case 675000:
> >  		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_675_617;
> > -		pcu_ack = 3;
> >  		break;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -1018,7 +1039,8 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  
> >  	/* inform PCU of the change */
> >  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > -	sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, pcu_ack);
> > +	sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> > +				cdclk_state->voltage);
> >  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> >  
> >  	intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> > @@ -1097,6 +1119,7 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  	if (cdclk_state.vco == 0)
> >  		cdclk_state.vco = 8100000;
> >  	cdclk_state.cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, cdclk_state.vco);
> > +	cdclk_state.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> >  
> >  	skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> >  }
> > @@ -1114,6 +1137,7 @@ void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  
> >  	cdclk_state.cdclk = cdclk_state.ref;
> >  	cdclk_state.vco = 0;
> > +	cdclk_state.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> >  
> >  	skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> >  }
> > @@ -1970,12 +1994,14 @@ static int skl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> >  
> >  	intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> >  	intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> > +	intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> >  
> >  	if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> >  		cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
> >  
> >  		intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> >  		intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> > +		intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> >  	} else {
> >  		intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> >  			intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> > -- 
> > 2.13.6
> > 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-20 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-18 20:48 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Clean up some cdclk switch statements Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19  7:20   ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Start tracking voltage level in the cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:32   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 14:01   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:43     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 12:13       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 17:14         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: USe cdclk_state->voltage on VLV/CHV Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 17:43   ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: Use " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:42     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:20       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03   ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BDW Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:44   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:14     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:47     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on SKL/KBL/CFL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:47   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:18     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-10-20 20:45       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BXT/GLK Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 21:50   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 22:43     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-19 10:48     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 10:56       ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-19 12:19         ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 23:52       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 18:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Adjust system agent voltage on CNL if required by DDI ports Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:54   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:11     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:48       ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-20 20:07         ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:36           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 21:44             ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-23 12:03               ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 11:48             ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 14:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:11       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:09   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 16:52     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:05   ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-23 18:39     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 21:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Patchwork
2017-10-19 17:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 18:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-19 18:52 ` Patchwork
2017-10-19 20:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2017-10-19 23:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-20  0:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-20 16:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev3) Patchwork
2017-10-20 17:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev6) Patchwork
2017-10-20 19:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171020111812.GD10981@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox