From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BDW
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 13:47:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171020204727.ho7a6f5vvu2jypoi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171020170358.25030-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:03:58PM +0000, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk state
> on BDW. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value since
> there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume that
> it worked.
>
> v2: Keep the WARN_ON (Rodrigo)
thanks
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index e2f18545d20c..ab0481183bae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -639,6 +639,21 @@ static int bdw_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk)
> return 337500;
> }
>
> +static u8 bdw_calc_voltage(int cdclk)
> +{
> + switch (cdclk) {
> + default:
> + case 337500:
> + return 2;
> + case 450000:
> + return 0;
> + case 540000:
> + return 1;
> + case 675000:
> + return 3;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void bdw_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> {
> @@ -657,13 +672,19 @@ static void bdw_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> cdclk_state->cdclk = 337500;
> else
> cdclk_state->cdclk = 675000;
> +
> + /*
> + * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
> + * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
> + */
> + cdclk_state->voltage = bdw_calc_voltage(cdclk_state->cdclk);
> }
>
> static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> {
> int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> - uint32_t val, data;
> + uint32_t val;
> int ret;
>
> if (WARN((I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL) &
> @@ -704,19 +725,15 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> /* fall through */
> case 337500:
> val |= LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_337_5_BDW;
> - data = 2;
> break;
> case 450000:
> val |= LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_450;
> - data = 0;
> break;
> case 540000:
> val |= LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_54O_BDW;
> - data = 1;
> break;
> case 675000:
> val |= LCPLL_CLK_FREQ_675_BDW;
> - data = 3;
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -731,7 +748,8 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
>
> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> - sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ, data);
> + sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
> + cdclk_state->voltage);
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
>
> I915_WRITE(CDCLK_FREQ, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk, 1000) - 1);
> @@ -1910,11 +1928,13 @@ static int bdw_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> cdclk = bdw_calc_cdclk(min_cdclk);
>
> intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> + intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage = bdw_calc_voltage(cdclk);
>
> if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> cdclk = bdw_calc_cdclk(0);
>
> intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> + intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage = bdw_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> } else {
> intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> --
> 2.13.6
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-20 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 20:48 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Clean up some cdclk switch statements Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 7:20 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Start tracking voltage level in the cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 14:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 12:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 17:14 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: USe cdclk_state->voltage on VLV/CHV Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 17:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: Use " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BDW Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:44 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on SKL/KBL/CFL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BXT/GLK Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 21:50 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 22:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-19 10:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 10:56 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-19 12:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 23:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 18:29 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Adjust system agent voltage on CNL if required by DDI ports Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:54 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:48 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-20 20:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 21:44 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-23 12:03 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 11:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 14:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 16:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-23 18:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 21:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Patchwork
2017-10-19 17:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 18:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-19 18:52 ` Patchwork
2017-10-19 20:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2017-10-19 23:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-20 0:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-20 16:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev3) Patchwork
2017-10-20 17:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev6) Patchwork
2017-10-20 19:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171020204727.ho7a6f5vvu2jypoi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox