public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Apply Wa Display #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl.
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:30:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171023133021.GZ10981@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171020221549.5781-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:15:49PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Wa Display #1183 was recently added to workaround
> "Failures when enabling DPLL0 with eDP link rate 2.16
> or 4.32 GHz and CD clock frequency 308.57 or 617.14 MHz
> (CDCLK_CTL CD Frequency Select 10b or 11b) used in this
>  enabling or in previous enabling."
> 
> This Workaround was designed to minimize the impact only
> to save the bad case with that link rates. But HW engineers
> indicated that it should be safe to apply broadly. Although
> they were expecting the DPLL0 link rate to be unchanged on
> runtime.
> 
> So, we could only apply if vco is 8640000. However this
> would require a synchronization with intel_csr.c. Probably
> a dev_priv->wa1183 bool.
> 
> Another equaly ugly possibility would be to save the edp_link_rate
> on dev_priv. With this we could fix one corner case that
> although rare I believe our code could hit that is if
> desired port clock is 4.32GHz our dpll0_enable initially
> sets the link rate to DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_1080 while
> it should set to DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_2160.
> 
> v2: - Avoid RMW for every step since we know exactly what
>       we should set. This also fix a bug on v1.
>     - Remove set of minimal CDCLK since this is not needed
>       in the WA. At least one less write to CDCLK_CTL
>       since the other ones cannot be grouped.
>     - Fix commit message.
> 
> Cc: Arthur J Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c      | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 68a58cce6ab1..816b9665e092 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6980,6 +6980,7 @@ enum {
>  #define  RESET_PCH_HANDSHAKE_ENABLE	(1<<4)
>  
>  #define GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1		_MMIO(0x46430)
> +#define   SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT	(1<<30)
>  #define   MASK_WAKEMEM			(1<<13)
>  
>  #define SKL_DFSM			_MMIO(0x51000)
> @@ -8526,6 +8527,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_4	(3<<22)
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe)	((pipe)<<20)
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE	BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3)
> +#define  DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE		(1<<19)
>  #define  BXT_CDCLK_SSA_PRECHARGE_ENABLE	(1<<16)
>  #define  CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL_MASK	(0x7ff)
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> index b2a6d62b71c0..5ecd5cb44e43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -858,18 +858,13 @@ static void skl_set_preferred_cdclk_vco(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		intel_update_max_cdclk(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
> -static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
> +static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco,
> +			     u32 freq_select)
>  {
> -	int min_cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	WARN_ON(vco != 8100000 && vco != 8640000);
>  
> -	/* select the minimum CDCLK before enabling DPLL 0 */
> -	val = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308 | skl_cdclk_decimal(min_cdclk);
> -	I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
> -	POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * We always enable DPLL0 with the lowest link rate possible, but still
>  	 * taking into account the VCO required to operate the eDP panel at the
> @@ -894,6 +889,10 @@ static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
>  	I915_WRITE(DPLL_CTRL1, val);
>  	POSTING_READ(DPLL_CTRL1);
>  
> +	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
> +	val = DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE;
> +	I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
> +
>  	I915_WRITE(LCPLL1_CTL, I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) | LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE);
>  
>  	if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> @@ -901,6 +900,17 @@ static void skl_dpll0_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
>  				    5))
>  		DRM_ERROR("DPLL0 not locked\n");
>  
> +	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
> +	val &= ~CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK;;
> +	I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
> +
> +	val |= freq_select;
> +	I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);
> +
> +	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
> +	val &= ~DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE;
> +	I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, val);

If I understood the w/a correctly we should pull all of this outa into
skl_set_cdclk(). Otherwise we'd only do these gymnastics when changing
the VCO between 8640 and 8100, whereas IIRC the w/a said that we should
do it every time VCO=8640 is going to be used, or maybe even was
used previously.

> +
>  	dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco = vco;
>  
>  	/* We'll want to keep using the current vco from now on. */
> @@ -964,15 +974,18 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> +	freq_select |= skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk);
> +

So I'm thinking here we should first set divmux_override=1,
after which we'd set freq_select=0.

>  	if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
>  	    dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
>  		skl_dpll0_disable(dev_priv);
>  
> -	if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> -		skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco);
> -
> -	I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select | skl_cdclk_decimal(cdclk));
> -	POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> +	if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco) {
> +		skl_dpll0_enable(dev_priv, vco, freq_select);
> +	} else {
> +		I915_WRITE(CDCLK_CTL, freq_select);
> +		POSTING_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> +	}

And here we'd first set the final freq_select here, and
finally set divmux_override=0.

>  
>  	/* inform PCU of the change */
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 8af286c63d3b..e0bc2debdad0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,11 @@ void gen9_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling DC5\n");
>  
> +	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
> +	if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> +		I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) |
> +			   SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
> +
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5);
>  }
>  
> @@ -625,6 +630,11 @@ void skl_disable_dc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling DC6\n");
>  
> +	/* Wa Display #1183: skl,kbl,cfl */
> +	if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv))
> +		I915_WRITE(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, I915_READ(GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1) |
> +			   SKL_SELECT_ALTERNATE_DC_EXIT);
> +
>  	gen9_set_dc_state(dev_priv, DC_STATE_DISABLE);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.13.5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-23 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-17 17:38 [PATCH] drm/i915: Apply Wa Display #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-17 18:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2017-10-17 19:25 ` [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-17 23:33   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20  0:48   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 22:15   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 13:30     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-10-20 22:37 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Apply Wa Display #1183 on skl, kbl, and cfl. (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-21  0:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171023133021.GZ10981@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arthur.j.runyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox