public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on SKL/KBL/CFL
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:52:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024095216.1638-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024095216.1638-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk state
on SKL/KBL/CFL. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value since
there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume that
it worked.

v2: s/voltage/voltage_level/ (Rodrigo)

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index c98fec333dd1..38e31df265bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -785,6 +785,24 @@ static int skl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk, int vco)
 	}
 }
 
+static u8 skl_calc_voltage_level(int cdclk)
+{
+	switch (cdclk) {
+	default:
+	case 308571:
+	case 337500:
+		return 0;
+	case 450000:
+	case 432000:
+		return 1;
+	case 540000:
+		return 2;
+	case 617143:
+	case 675000:
+		return 3;
+	}
+}
+
 static void skl_dpll0_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			     struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 {
@@ -835,7 +853,7 @@ static void skl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->ref;
 
 	if (cdclk_state->vco == 0)
-		return;
+		goto out;
 
 	cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
 
@@ -876,6 +894,14 @@ static void skl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			break;
 		}
 	}
+
+ out:
+	/*
+	 * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
+	 * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
+	 */
+	cdclk_state->voltage_level =
+		skl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state->cdclk);
 }
 
 /* convert from kHz to .1 fixpoint MHz with -1MHz offset */
@@ -960,7 +986,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 {
 	int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
 	int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
-	u32 freq_select, pcu_ack;
+	u32 freq_select;
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
@@ -984,21 +1010,17 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	case 308571:
 	case 337500:
 		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308;
-		pcu_ack = 0;
 		break;
 	case 450000:
 	case 432000:
 		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_450_432;
-		pcu_ack = 1;
 		break;
 	case 540000:
 		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_540;
-		pcu_ack = 2;
 		break;
 	case 617143:
 	case 675000:
 		freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_675_617;
-		pcu_ack = 3;
 		break;
 	}
 
@@ -1014,7 +1036,8 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 
 	/* inform PCU of the change */
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
-	sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, pcu_ack);
+	sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
+				cdclk_state->voltage_level);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
 
 	intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
@@ -1093,6 +1116,7 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	if (cdclk_state.vco == 0)
 		cdclk_state.vco = 8100000;
 	cdclk_state.cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, cdclk_state.vco);
+	cdclk_state.voltage_level = skl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
 
 	skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
 }
@@ -1110,6 +1134,7 @@ void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 	cdclk_state.cdclk = cdclk_state.ref;
 	cdclk_state.vco = 0;
+	cdclk_state.voltage_level = skl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk_state.cdclk);
 
 	skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
 }
@@ -1968,12 +1993,16 @@ static int skl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 
 	intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
 	intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
+	intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage_level =
+		skl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk);
 
 	if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
 		cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
 
 		intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
 		intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
+		intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage_level =
+			skl_calc_voltage_level(cdclk);
 	} else {
 		intel_state->cdclk.actual =
 			intel_state->cdclk.logical;
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-24  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-24  9:52 [PATCH v2 00/10] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Clean up some cdclk switch statements Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915: Start tracking voltage level in the cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on VLV/CHV Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BDW Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BXT/GLK Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] drm/i915: Adjust system agent voltage on CNL if required by DDI ports Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Sanity check cdclk in vlv_set_cdclk() Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24 17:47   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-24  9:52 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Perform a central cdclk state sanity check Ville Syrjala
2017-10-24 21:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-24 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-24 11:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev7) Patchwork
2017-10-24 13:23 ` Patchwork
2017-10-24 17:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2017-10-24 18:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2017-10-24 20:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-25  6:15   ` Saarinen, Jani
2017-10-24 21:29 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-25 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171024095216.1638-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox