[PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10

[PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10

[Juha-Pekka Heikkila]

90/270 16bpp rotation is supported in hadrware from Gen10 onwards. I modified
kms_rotation_crc igt test to test this feature:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/186179/

/Juha-Pekka

Juha-Pekka Heikkila (2):
  drm/i915: Move 90/270 rotation validity check into its own function
  drm/i915: Enable 16bpp 90/270 plane rotation for gen10 onwards.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move 90/270 rotation validity check into its own function

[Juha-Pekka Heikkila]

This makes intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state() generally shorter.

Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
index 8e6dc15..6c4c82e2d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
@@ -107,6 +107,35 @@ intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(plane, state);
 }
 
+static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
+{
+	struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
+
+	if (state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
+	    state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Y/Yf tiling required for 90/270!\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
+	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
+	 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
+	 */
+	switch (state->fb->format->format) {
+	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
+	case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
+			      drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
+						  &format_name));
+		return false;
+
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
 					struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 					const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
@@ -138,30 +167,8 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
 		crtc_state->base.enable ? crtc_state->pipe_src_h : 0;
 
 	if (state->fb && drm_rotation_90_or_270(state->rotation)) {
-		struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
-
-		if (state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
-		    state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
-			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Y/Yf tiling required for 90/270!\n");
+		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
-		 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
-		 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
-		 */
-		switch (state->fb->format->format) {
-		case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
-		case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
-			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
-			              drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
-			                                  &format_name));
-			return -EINVAL;
-
-		default:
-			break;
-		}
 	}
 
 	/* CHV ignores the mirror bit when the rotate bit is set :( */
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move 90/270 rotation validity check into its own function

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:37:57PM +0200, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
> This makes intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state() generally shorter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 8e6dc15..6c4c82e2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,35 @@ intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  	drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(plane, state);
>  }
>  
> +static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
> +
> +	if (state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
> +	    state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Y/Yf tiling required for 90/270!\n");
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
> +	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
> +	 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
> +	 */
> +	switch (state->fb->format->format) {
> +	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
> +	case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
> +			      drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
> +						  &format_name));
> +		return false;
> +
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}

Usually there's an empty line after the final return.

> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>  					struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  					const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
> @@ -138,30 +167,8 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
>  		crtc_state->base.enable ? crtc_state->pipe_src_h : 0;
>  
>  	if (state->fb && drm_rotation_90_or_270(state->rotation)) {

I'd pull these checks into the new function as well (as an early
return so that we don't have to needlessly indent the whole
function body). Otherwise the function name doesn't really match
the implementation.

> -		struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
> -
> -		if (state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
> -		    state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Y/Yf tiling required for 90/270!\n");
> +		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
> -		 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
> -		 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
> -		 */
> -		switch (state->fb->format->format) {
> -		case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
> -		case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
> -			              drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
> -			                                  &format_name));
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -
> -		default:
> -			break;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* CHV ignores the mirror bit when the rotate bit is set :( */
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Move 90/270 rotation validity check into its own function

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:50:17PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:37:57PM +0200, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
> > This makes intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state() generally shorter.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > index 8e6dc15..6c4c82e2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> > @@ -107,6 +107,35 @@ intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
> >  	drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(plane, state);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)

Oh and please name this parameter 'plane_state'. We're trying to slowly
clean up the mess with inconsistent naming of things.

> > +{
> > +	struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
> > +
> > +	if (state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
> > +	    state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Y/Yf tiling required for 90/270!\n");
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
> > +	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
> > +	 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
> > +	 */
> > +	switch (state->fb->format->format) {
> > +	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
> > +	case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
> > +			      drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
> > +						  &format_name));
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> 
> Usually there's an empty line after the final return.
> 
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> >  					struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >  					const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
> > @@ -138,30 +167,8 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
> >  		crtc_state->base.enable ? crtc_state->pipe_src_h : 0;
> >  
> >  	if (state->fb && drm_rotation_90_or_270(state->rotation)) {
> 
> I'd pull these checks into the new function as well (as an early
> return so that we don't have to needlessly indent the whole
> function body). Otherwise the function name doesn't really match
> the implementation.
> 
> > -		struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
> > -
> > -		if (state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
> > -		    state->fb->modifier != I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) {
> > -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Y/Yf tiling required for 90/270!\n");
> > +		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state))
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		/*
> > -		 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
> > -		 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
> > -		 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
> > -		 */
> > -		switch (state->fb->format->format) {
> > -		case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
> > -		case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> > -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
> > -			              drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
> > -			                                  &format_name));
> > -			return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -		default:
> > -			break;
> > -		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* CHV ignores the mirror bit when the rotate bit is set :( */
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Enable 16bpp 90/270 plane rotation for gen10 onwards.

[Juha-Pekka Heikkila]

From gen10 onwards 16bpp 90/270 rotation is supported on hardware.

Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Testcase: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/186179/
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
index 6c4c82e2d..502d27a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
 	drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(plane, state);
 }
 
-static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
+static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state,
+				 const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
 
@@ -118,13 +119,19 @@ static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
-	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
+	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16 and Indexed 8-bit.
+	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5 is allowed gen10 onwards.
 	 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
 	 */
 	switch (state->fb->format->format) {
-	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
 	case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
+		/*
+		 * gen10 onwards supports 16bpp 90/270 rotation
+		 */
+		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
+			break;
+
+	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
 			      drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
 						  &format_name));
@@ -167,7 +174,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
 		crtc_state->base.enable ? crtc_state->pipe_src_h : 0;
 
 	if (state->fb && drm_rotation_90_or_270(state->rotation)) {
-		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state))
+		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state, dev_priv))
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Enable 16bpp 90/270 plane rotation for gen10 onwards.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
> From gen10 onwards 16bpp 90/270 rotation is supported on hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
> Testcase: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/186179/
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index 6c4c82e2d..502d27a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ intel_plane_destroy_state(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  	drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state(plane, state);
>  }
>  
> -static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
> +static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state,
> +				 const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {

I wouldn't pass the dev_priv. We can dig it out here, eg:

struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->base.plane);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev);

When we do pass dev_priv, it's usually the first parameter to the
function.

>  	struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
>  
> @@ -118,13 +119,19 @@ static bool intel_valid_rotation(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16,
> -	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5, and Indexed 8-bit.
> +	 * 90/270 is not allowed with RGB64 16:16:16:16 and Indexed 8-bit.
> +	 * RGB 16-bit 5:6:5 is allowed gen10 onwards.
>  	 * TBD: Add RGB64 case once its added in supported format list.
>  	 */
>  	switch (state->fb->format->format) {
> -	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
>  	case DRM_FORMAT_RGB565:
> +		/*
> +		 * gen10 onwards supports 16bpp 90/270 rotation
> +		 */

This comment looks rather redundant.

> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> +			break;
> +

+		/* fall through */

I believe we have -Wimplicit-fallthrough now enabled, and I think that
would warn about this w/o the comment if you have a recent enough gcc.

> +	case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported pixel format %s for 90/270!\n",
>  			      drm_get_format_name(state->fb->format->format,
>  						  &format_name));
> @@ -167,7 +174,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
>  		crtc_state->base.enable ? crtc_state->pipe_src_h : 0;
>  
>  	if (state->fb && drm_rotation_90_or_270(state->rotation)) {
> -		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state))
> +		if (!intel_valid_rotation(state, dev_priv))
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33133/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 33133v1 drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/33133/revisions/1/mbox/

Test gem_exec_flush:
        Subgroup basic-wb-set-default:
                incomplete -> PASS       (fi-glk-dsi)
Test gem_exec_reloc:
        Subgroup basic-write-gtt-active:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102582
Test kms_busy:
        Subgroup basic-flip-b:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-bwr-2160)
        Subgroup basic-flip-c:
                notrun     -> INCOMPLETE (fi-glk-dsi)
Test drv_module_reload:
        Subgroup basic-no-display:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r) fdo#103534

fdo#102582 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
fdo#103534 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103534

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:449s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:449s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:549s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:276s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:505s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:503s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:253  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:505s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:249  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:490s
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:254  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32  time:555s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:428s
fi-gdg-551       total:289  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:109 time:263s
fi-glk-1         total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:583s
fi-glk-dsi       total:208  pass:185  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:22 
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:435s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:432s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:61  time:426s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:499s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:461s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:494s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:575s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:479s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:585s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:66  time:564s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:452s
fi-skl-6600u     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:600s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:647s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:517s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:502s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:454s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:588s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:425s

de359919ae463cdaef6bc6890156df84e19dee2a drm-tip: 2017y-11m-03d-14h-00m-37s UTC integration manifest
0f5c0cbf06bf drm/i915: Enable 16bpp 90/270 plane rotation for gen10 onwards.
523e634c3ba8 drm/i915: Move 90/270 rotation validity check into its own function

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6942/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: This set enables 90/270 degree rotation on 16bpp planes on gen10
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33133/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Test kms_setmode:
        Subgroup basic:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
Test kms_busy:
        Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-oldfb-with-reset-render-C:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw)
Test drv_suspend:
        Subgroup fence-restore-untiled-hibernate:
                dmesg-fail -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#103375

fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
fdo#103375 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375

shard-hsw        total:2539 pass:1433 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:8   skip:1097 time:9296s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6942/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx