[PATCH 0/7] WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.

[PATCH 0/7] WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

With these fixes and clean-ups around wrpll plus
extending HDMI 2.0 from GLK to CNL we could finally
get a functional HDMI 2.0 display with 4k60Hz.

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

Rodrigo Vivi (7):
  drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.
  drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.
  drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.
  drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.
  drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.
  drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.
  drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 42 ++++++++++++++---------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c     |  7 +++---
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

"Display software must leave this field at the default value.
It no longer needs to be configured as part of PLL programming."

We respect this already and we are setting up the default
one line below: "DPLL_CFGCR1_CENTRAL_FREQ".

Also we don't touch anywhere else this central_freq for cnl.
So let's remove from the final write.

No functional change. Only a clean-up patch.

Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index be74d4767c8a..61c684ac47af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2265,7 +2265,6 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 		DPLL_CFGCR1_QDIV_MODE(wrpll_params.qdiv_mode) |
 		DPLL_CFGCR1_KDIV(wrpll_params.kdiv) |
 		DPLL_CFGCR1_PDIV(wrpll_params.pdiv) |
-		wrpll_params.central_freq |
 		DPLL_CFGCR1_CENTRAL_FREQ;
 
 	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.

[Manasi Navare]

Verified this from the Bspec that central frequency should
be left at default at 8400MHz which is value 3 in cfgcr1.central_freq.
Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:53AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> "Display software must leave this field at the default value.
> It no longer needs to be configured as part of PLL programming."
> 
> We respect this already and we are setting up the default
> one line below: "DPLL_CFGCR1_CENTRAL_FREQ".
> 
> Also we don't touch anywhere else this central_freq for cnl.
> So let's remove from the final write.
> 
> No functional change. Only a clean-up patch.
> 
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index be74d4767c8a..61c684ac47af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2265,7 +2265,6 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  		DPLL_CFGCR1_QDIV_MODE(wrpll_params.qdiv_mode) |
>  		DPLL_CFGCR1_KDIV(wrpll_params.kdiv) |
>  		DPLL_CFGCR1_PDIV(wrpll_params.pdiv) |
> -		wrpll_params.central_freq |
>  		DPLL_CFGCR1_CENTRAL_FREQ;
>  
>  	memset(&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, 0,
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

No functional change. Just starting the wrpll fixes
with a clean-up to make units a bit more clear.

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 61c684ac47af..db7afd314462 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2198,11 +2198,11 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params, uint32_t
 }
 
 static bool
-cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,
+cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
 			struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
 {
-	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5 / KHz(1); /* clocks in kHz */
+	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5;
 	unsigned int dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
 	unsigned int dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
 	unsigned int dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
@@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 
 	cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_HDMI_MODE;
 
-	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock * 1000, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
+	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
 		return false;
 
 	cfgcr0 |= DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.

[Manasi Navare]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:54AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> No functional change. Just starting the wrpll fixes
> with a clean-up to make units a bit more clear.
> 
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 61c684ac47af..db7afd314462 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2198,11 +2198,11 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params, uint32_t
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,

Now the clock sent is already in KHz, should we have that in the comment either
in the argument or afe_clock calculation? 
Apart from this nitpick, looks good.

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
 
> +cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  			struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>  {
> -	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5 / KHz(1); /* clocks in kHz */
> +	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5;
>  	unsigned int dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
>  	unsigned int dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
>  	unsigned int dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  
>  	cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_HDMI_MODE;
>  
> -	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock * 1000, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
> +	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	cfgcr0 |= DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:54AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> No functional change. Just starting the wrpll fixes
>> with a clean-up to make units a bit more clear.
>> 
>> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
>> index 61c684ac47af..db7afd314462 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
>> @@ -2198,11 +2198,11 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params, uint32_t
>>  }
>>  
>>  static bool
>> -cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock /* in Hz */,
>
> Now the clock sent is already in KHz, should we have that in the comment either
> in the argument or afe_clock calculation? 
> Apart from this nitpick, looks good.

We use kHz for clocks all over the place, IMO only any deviation from
that needs to be documented.

BR,
Jani.


>
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>  
>> +cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>>  			struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>>  {
>> -	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5 / KHz(1); /* clocks in kHz */
>> +	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5;
>>  	unsigned int dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
>>  	unsigned int dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
>>  	unsigned int dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
>> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>  
>>  	cfgcr0 = DPLL_CFGCR0_HDMI_MODE;
>>  
>> -	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock * 1000, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
>> +	if (!cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock, dev_priv, &wrpll_params))
>>  		return false;
>>  
>>  	cfgcr0 |= DPLL_CFGCR0_DCO_FRACTION(wrpll_params.dco_fraction) |
>> -- 
>> 2.13.6
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

- 64 bits is not needed for afe_clock now we don't convert
  that to Hz.
- 16 bits is not enough for all dco stuff.
- unsigned is not relevant/needed for all divisors values.

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index db7afd314462..fba969cbda37 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2110,10 +2110,8 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void cnl_wrpll_get_multipliers(unsigned int bestdiv,
-				      unsigned int *pdiv,
-				      unsigned int *qdiv,
-				      unsigned int *kdiv)
+static void cnl_wrpll_get_multipliers(int bestdiv, int *pdiv,
+				      int *qdiv, int *kdiv)
 {
 	/* even dividers */
 	if (bestdiv % 2 == 0) {
@@ -2151,9 +2149,9 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_get_multipliers(unsigned int bestdiv,
 	}
 }
 
-static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params, uint32_t dco_freq,
-				      uint32_t ref_freq, uint32_t pdiv, uint32_t qdiv,
-				      uint32_t kdiv)
+static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
+				      u32 dco_freq, u32 ref_freq,
+				      int pdiv, int qdiv, int kdiv)
 {
 	switch (kdiv) {
 	case 1:
@@ -2202,23 +2200,19 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
 			struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
 {
-	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5;
-	unsigned int dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
-	unsigned int dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
-	unsigned int dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
-
+	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
+	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
+	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
+	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
 	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
 					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
 					 42, 44, 48, 50, 52, 54,  56,  60,
 					 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 76,  78,  80,
 					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
 					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
-	unsigned int d, dco;
-	unsigned int dco_centrality = 0;
-	unsigned int best_dco_centrality = 999999;
-	unsigned int best_div = 0;
-	unsigned int best_dco = 0;
-	unsigned int pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
+	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
+	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
+	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
 
 	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
 		dco = afe_clock * dividers[d];
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.

[Manasi Navare]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:55AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> - 64 bits is not needed for afe_clock now we don't convert
>   that to Hz.
> - 16 bits is not enough for all dco stuff.
> - unsigned is not relevant/needed for all divisors values.
> 

Yup great catch, DCO stuff needs 3 bytes so we need to define it as
u32.

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com

> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index db7afd314462..fba969cbda37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2110,10 +2110,8 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_pll_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void cnl_wrpll_get_multipliers(unsigned int bestdiv,
> -				      unsigned int *pdiv,
> -				      unsigned int *qdiv,
> -				      unsigned int *kdiv)
> +static void cnl_wrpll_get_multipliers(int bestdiv, int *pdiv,
> +				      int *qdiv, int *kdiv)
>  {
>  	/* even dividers */
>  	if (bestdiv % 2 == 0) {
> @@ -2151,9 +2149,9 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_get_multipliers(unsigned int bestdiv,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params, uint32_t dco_freq,
> -				      uint32_t ref_freq, uint32_t pdiv, uint32_t qdiv,
> -				      uint32_t kdiv)
> +static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
> +				      u32 dco_freq, u32 ref_freq,
> +				      int pdiv, int qdiv, int kdiv)
>  {
>  	switch (kdiv) {
>  	case 1:
> @@ -2202,23 +2200,19 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  			struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>  {
> -	uint64_t afe_clock = clock * 5;
> -	unsigned int dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> -	unsigned int dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> -	unsigned int dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
> -
> +	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> +	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> +	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> +	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
>  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
>  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
>  					 42, 44, 48, 50, 52, 54,  56,  60,
>  					 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 76,  78,  80,
>  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
>  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
> -	unsigned int d, dco;
> -	unsigned int dco_centrality = 0;
> -	unsigned int best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> -	unsigned int best_div = 0;
> -	unsigned int best_dco = 0;
> -	unsigned int pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
> +	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> +	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
>  
>  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
>  		dco = afe_clock * dividers[d];
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
working.

This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.

Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
 			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
 {
 	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
-	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
-	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
+	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
+	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
 	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
 	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
 					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
@@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
 					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
 					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
 	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
-	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
+	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;
 	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
 
 	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> working.
> 
> This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> 
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>  {
>  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
>  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
>  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
>  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
> @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
>  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
>  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;

UINT_MAX, -1, or ~0 maybe?

>  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
>  
>  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:00:31PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> > clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> > forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> > get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> > working.
> > 
> > This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> > directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> > 
> > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> >  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
> >  {
> >  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> > -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> > -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> > +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> > +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
> >  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
> >  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
> >  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
> > @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> >  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
> >  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
> >  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> > -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> > +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;
> 
> UINT_MAX, -1, or ~0 maybe?

yeap, I considered the max macros, but I didn't want to deviate
from spec...

> 
> >  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
> >  
> >  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
> > -- 
> > 2.13.6
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:09:39PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:00:31PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> > > clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> > > forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> > > get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> > > working.
> > > 
> > > This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> > > directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> > >  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
> > >  {
> > >  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> > > -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> > > -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> > > +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> > > +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
> > >  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
> > >  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
> > >  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
> > > @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> > >  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
> > >  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
> > >  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> > > -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> > > +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;
> > 
> > UINT_MAX, -1, or ~0 maybe?
> 
> yeap, I considered the max macros, but I didn't want to deviate
> from spec...

Always bothers me to see some kind of 999... decimal max value pulled
out from someone's hat when they obvious thing clearly is just "max
representable value". Feels like someone wasn't thinking 100% when
they wrote the spec :)

Maybe just extend the 9's all the way to the end then? Dunno. I think
I'll just move on from the DDI DPLL code (that apporach has worked
pretty well thus far ;)

> 
> > 
> > >  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
> > > -- 
> > > 2.13.6
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
working.

Spec tells 999999 for initial best_dco_centrality meaning the
max value in MHz.
Since we convert dco from MHz to KHz we also need to convert
this initial best_doc_centrality to 999999000 or 999999999
or even better, to the max that its variable allow.

This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.

v2: Use U32_MAX instead of random 99999 as spec tells. (Ville).

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index fba969cbda37..6cc12abdd39e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
 			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
 {
 	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
-	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
-	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
+	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
+	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
 	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
 	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
 					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
@@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
 					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
 					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
 	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
-	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
+	u32 best_dco_centrality = U32_MAX; /* Spec meaning of 999999 MHz */
 	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
 
 	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:42:23PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> working.
> 
> Spec tells 999999 for initial best_dco_centrality meaning the
> max value in MHz.
> Since we convert dco from MHz to KHz we also need to convert
> this initial best_doc_centrality to 999999000 or 999999999
> or even better, to the max that its variable allow.
> 
> This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> 
> v2: Use U32_MAX instead of random 99999 as spec tells. (Ville).
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index fba969cbda37..6cc12abdd39e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>  {
>  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
>  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
>  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10, 12,  14,  16,
>  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30, 32,  36,  40,
> @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98, 100, 102,
>  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
>  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> +	u32 best_dco_centrality = U32_MAX; /* Spec meaning of 999999 MHz */
>  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
>  
>  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
> -- 
> 2.13.6

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Mika Kahola]

On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 11:47 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> working.
> 
> This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> 
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
>  {
>  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
>  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
>  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10,
> 12,  14,  16,
>  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30,
> 32,  36,  40,
> @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
>  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98,
> 100, 102,
>  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
>  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;
>  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
>  
>  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
-- 
Mika Kahola - Intel OTC

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:06:16AM +0000, Mika Kahola wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 11:47 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> > clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> > forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> > get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> > working.
> > 
> > This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> > directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> > 
> > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>

999999000 or U32_MAX?

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> >  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
> >  {
> >  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> > -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> > -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> > +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> > +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
> >  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
> >  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10,
> > 12,  14,  16,
> >  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30,
> > 32,  36,  40,
> > @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> >  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98,
> > 100, 102,
> >  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21 };
> >  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> > -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> > +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;
> >  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
> >  
> >  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
> -- 
> Mika Kahola - Intel OTC
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.

[Mika Kahola]

On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 10:04 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:06:16AM +0000, Mika Kahola wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 11:47 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > 
> > > Spec describe all values in MHz. We handle our
> > > clocks in KHz. This includes the best_dco_centrality that was
> > > forgot in the same unity as spec. Consequently we couldn't
> > > get a good divider for high frequenies. Hence HDMI 2.0 wasn't
> > > working.
> > > 
> > > This patch also replaces the use of "* KHz(1)" with the values
> > > directly on KHz to avoid future confusion.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> 999999000 or U32_MAX?
The BSpec seems to favor 999999000 so I would follow the spec here.

> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > index fba969cbda37..53f650f56148 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > @@ -2201,8 +2201,8 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> > >  			struct skl_wrpll_params *wrpll_params)
> > >  {
> > >  	u32 afe_clock = clock * 5;
> > > -	u32 dco_min = 7998 * KHz(1);
> > > -	u32 dco_max = 10000 * KHz(1);
> > > +	u32 dco_min = 7998000;
> > > +	u32 dco_max = 10000000;
> > >  	u32 dco_mid = (dco_min + dco_max) / 2;
> > >  	static const int dividers[] = {  2,  4,  6,  8, 10,
> > > 12,  14,  16,
> > >  					 18, 20, 24, 28, 30,
> > > 32,  36,  40,
> > > @@ -2211,7 +2211,7 @@ cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(int clock,
> > >  					 84, 88, 90, 92, 96, 98,
> > > 100, 102,
> > >  					  3,  5,  7,  9, 15, 21
> > > };
> > >  	u32 dco, best_dco = 0, dco_centrality = 0;
> > > -	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999;
> > > +	u32 best_dco_centrality = 999999000;
> > >  	int d, best_div = 0, pdiv = 0, qdiv = 0, kdiv = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	for (d = 0; d < ARRAY_SIZE(dividers); d++) {
-- 
Mika Kahola - Intel OTC

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Accordingly to spec "If Kdiv != 2, then Qdiv must be 1."
but we already handle qdiv values properly and this case here
should be spurious. But instead of blindly replacing let's
warn loudly instead. Because it means something was really
wrong on initial setup.

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 53f650f56148..bd608f7f2399 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2184,8 +2184,7 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
 		WARN(1, "Incorrect PDiv\n");
 	}
 
-	if (kdiv != 2)
-		qdiv = 1;
+	WARN_ON(kdiv != 2 && qdiv != 1);
 
 	params->qdiv_ratio = qdiv;
 	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.

[Manasi Navare]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:57AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Accordingly to spec "If Kdiv != 2, then Qdiv must be 1."
> but we already handle qdiv values properly and this case here
> should be spurious. But instead of blindly replacing let's
> warn loudly instead. Because it means something was really
> wrong on initial setup.
> 
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 53f650f56148..bd608f7f2399 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2184,8 +2184,7 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
>  		WARN(1, "Incorrect PDiv\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	if (kdiv != 2)
> -		qdiv = 1;
> +	WARN_ON(kdiv != 2 && qdiv != 1);
>  
>  	params->qdiv_ratio = qdiv;
>  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
so maybe this is cannot be called a "fix". But let's follow
the math that is written on Spec so we have get more confident
this is what hardware expect.

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index bd608f7f2399..ee690d2f6e54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2190,8 +2190,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
 	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
 
 	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
-	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
-					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
+	params->dco_fraction = (DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dco_freq, ref_freq) -
+				params->dco_integer) * (1 << 15);
 }
 
 static bool
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> so maybe this is cannot be called a "fix". But let's follow
> the math that is written on Spec so we have get more confident
> this is what hardware expect.
> 
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index bd608f7f2399..ee690d2f6e54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2190,8 +2190,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
>  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
>  
>  	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> +	params->dco_fraction = (DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dco_freq, ref_freq) -
> +				params->dco_integer) * (1 << 15);

Is dco_freq in khz here? Or hz?

If khz, the following should work... I think:

unsigned int dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq * 1000);
dco_int = dco >> 15;
dco_frac = dco & 0x7fff;

>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:22:27PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> > so maybe this is cannot be called a "fix". But let's follow
> > the math that is written on Spec so we have get more confident
> > this is what hardware expect.
> > 
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index bd608f7f2399..ee690d2f6e54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2190,8 +2190,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
> >  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
> >  
> >  	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> > -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> > -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> > +	params->dco_fraction = (DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dco_freq, ref_freq) -
> > +				params->dco_integer) * (1 << 15);
> 
> Is dco_freq in khz here? Or hz?
> 
> If khz, the following should work... I think:

khz

> 
> unsigned int dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq * 1000);

why to convert ref_freq? isn't this in khz as well already?

> dco_int = dco >> 15;
> dco_frac = dco & 0x7fff;

wow! my first thought was that was more complicated, but eureka,
this should be the right way to go...

Clearly better than spec... like that maximum in the other patch ;)

> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool
> > -- 
> > 2.13.6
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:22:27PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> > so maybe this is cannot be called a "fix". But let's follow
> > the math that is written on Spec so we have get more confident
> > this is what hardware expect.
> > 
> > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index bd608f7f2399..ee690d2f6e54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2190,8 +2190,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
> >  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
> >  
> >  	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> > -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> > -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> > +	params->dco_fraction = (DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dco_freq, ref_freq) -
> > +				params->dco_integer) * (1 << 15);
> 
> Is dco_freq in khz here? Or hz?
> 
> If khz, the following should work... I think:
> 
> unsigned int dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq * 1000);

Actually w/o the *1000 I suppose, for khz.

> dco_int = dco >> 15;
> dco_frac = dco & 0x7fff;
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool
> > -- 
> > 2.13.6
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:46:38PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:22:27PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> > > so maybe this is cannot be called a "fix". But let's follow
> > > the math that is written on Spec so we have get more confident
> > > this is what hardware expect.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > index bd608f7f2399..ee690d2f6e54 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > @@ -2190,8 +2190,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
> > >  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
> > >  
> > >  	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> > > -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> > > -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> > > +	params->dco_fraction = (DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dco_freq, ref_freq) -
> > > +				params->dco_integer) * (1 << 15);
> > 
> > Is dco_freq in khz here? Or hz?
> > 
> > If khz, the following should work... I think:
> > 

> > unsigned int dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq * 1000);
> 
> Actually w/o the *1000 I suppose, for khz.

On python it works apparently:
* (7998750 << 15)/24000
10920960 #"dco"
* ((7998750 << 15)/24000)>>15
333 #int
* ((7998750 << 15)/24000)&0x7ffff
435200 #frac

while on our code we get
dco = 4584
so int = 0
and frac = 4584...

div_u64 not working in float?

also this shows me that while this python gives us the frac 435200
my current code that follows spec gives frac 32768
and previous code was giving frac 9216

:/

more thoughts?

> 
> > dco_int = dco >> 15;
> > dco_frac = dco & 0x7fff;
> > 
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static bool
> > > -- 
> > > 2.13.6
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:29:57PM +0000, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:46:38PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:22:27PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> > > > so maybe this is cannot be called a "fix". But let's follow
> > > > the math that is written on Spec so we have get more confident
> > > > this is what hardware expect.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > index bd608f7f2399..ee690d2f6e54 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > @@ -2190,8 +2190,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
> > > >  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
> > > >
> > > >  	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> > > > -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> > > > -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> > > > +	params->dco_fraction = (DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(dco_freq, ref_freq) -
> > > > +				params->dco_integer) * (1 << 15);
> > >
> > > Is dco_freq in khz here? Or hz?
> > >
> > > If khz, the following should work... I think:
> > >
>
> > > unsigned int dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq * 1000);
> >
> > Actually w/o the *1000 I suppose, for khz.
>
> On python it works apparently:
> * (7998750 << 15)/24000
> 10920960 #"dco"
> * ((7998750 << 15)/24000)>>15
> 333 #int
> * ((7998750 << 15)/24000)&0x7ffff
> 435200 #frac
>
> while on our code we get
> dco = 4584
> so int = 0
> and frac = 4584...
>
> div_u64 not working in float?

oh! u32 << 15 was the issue...

So, with this code:

u64 dco = dco_freq;
dco = div_u64(dco << 15, ref_freq);
params->dco_integer = dco >> 15;
params->dco_fraction = dco & 0x7fff;

we have int 333 as expected and frac 92116 as the orig code.
So it seems the orig code was better after all. Although I'd
still want to clean it up.

But what bothers me now is that python gives a different frac
and also calculator shows this division as 333.28125

nothing seems to make us to get this 28125...

:/

but now that I know how it is all my attempts here lead me to 92116
and it works...

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

>
> also this shows me that while this python gives us the frac 435200
> my current code that follows spec gives frac 32768
> and previous code was giving frac 9216
>
> :/
>
> more thoughts?
>
> >
> > > dco_int = dco >> 15;
> > > dco_frac = dco & 0x7fff;
> > >
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  static bool
> > > > --
> > > > 2.13.6
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel OTC
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
it in the future.

v2: Don't follow the spec since that gives invalid
    values and it is also confusing. This Ville's
    version is much simpler.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 361b7102b602..f9651accecc9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2153,6 +2153,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
 				      u32 dco_freq, u32 ref_freq,
 				      int pdiv, int qdiv, int kdiv)
 {
+	u64 dco;
+
 	switch (kdiv) {
 	case 1:
 		params->kdiv = 1;
@@ -2189,9 +2191,10 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
 	params->qdiv_ratio = qdiv;
 	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
 
-	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
-	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
-					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
+	dco = dco_freq;
+	dco = div_u64(dco << 15, ref_freq);
+	params->dco_integer = dco >> 15;
+	params->dco_fraction = dco & 0x7fff;
 }
 
 static bool
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:51:26PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
> so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
> it in the future.
> 
> v2: Don't follow the spec since that gives invalid
>     values and it is also confusing. This Ville's
>     version is much simpler.
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 361b7102b602..f9651accecc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2153,6 +2153,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
>  				      u32 dco_freq, u32 ref_freq,
>  				      int pdiv, int qdiv, int kdiv)
>  {
> +	u64 dco;
> +
>  	switch (kdiv) {
>  	case 1:
>  		params->kdiv = 1;
> @@ -2189,9 +2191,10 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
>  	params->qdiv_ratio = qdiv;
>  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
>  
> -	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> +	dco = dco_freq;
> +	dco = div_u64(dco << 15, ref_freq);

A bit wasteful putting the result into a u64. The cast I had in my
earlier proposal should do.

> +	params->dco_integer = dco >> 15;
> +	params->dco_fraction = dco & 0x7fff;
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -- 
> 2.13.6

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Starting on GLK we support HDMI 2.0. So this patch only
extend the work Shashank has made to GLK to CNL.

v2: The version that compiles :/

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
index 2d95db64cdf2..96c314a6170a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ static int intel_hdmi_source_max_tmds_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
 		&dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[encoder->port];
 	int max_tmds_clock;
 
-	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
+	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
 		max_tmds_clock = 594000;
 	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
 		max_tmds_clock = 300000;
@@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ bool intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 
 	pipe_config->lane_count = 4;
 
-	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
+	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) ||
+					   INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)) {
 		if (scdc->scrambling.low_rates)
 			pipe_config->hdmi_scrambling = true;
 
@@ -2033,7 +2034,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
 	connector->doublescan_allowed = 0;
 	connector->stereo_allowed = 1;
 
-	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
+	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
 		connector->ycbcr_420_allowed = true;
 
 	intel_hdmi->ddc_bus = intel_hdmi_ddc_pin(dev_priv, port);
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:59AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Starting on GLK we support HDMI 2.0. So this patch only
> > extend the work Shashank has made to GLK to CNL.
> > 
> > v2: The version that compiles :/
> > 
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 7 ++++---
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > index 2d95db64cdf2..96c314a6170a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ static int intel_hdmi_source_max_tmds_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >  		&dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[encoder->port];
> >  	int max_tmds_clock;
> >  
> > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > +	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> 
> Cay you reorder this to 'GEN >= 10 || IS_GLK' ? (+ maybe the others to
> match).

Sure. I fully agree with this logic.

Would you be ok with Shashank request on
#define HAS_HDMI2_SUPPORT INTEL_GEN >= 10 || IS_GLK ?

Thanks,
Rodrigo.

> 
> I'd like to keep this in neat order from new to old, to
> make it easier to read.
> 
> With that 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> >  		max_tmds_clock = 594000;
> >  	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> >  		max_tmds_clock = 300000;
> > @@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ bool intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  
> >  	pipe_config->lane_count = 4;
> >  
> > -	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > +	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) ||
> > +					   INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)) {
> >  		if (scdc->scrambling.low_rates)
> >  			pipe_config->hdmi_scrambling = true;
> >  
> > @@ -2033,7 +2034,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> >  	connector->doublescan_allowed = 0;
> >  	connector->stereo_allowed = 1;
> >  
> > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > +	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> >  		connector->ycbcr_420_allowed = true;
> >  
> >  	intel_hdmi->ddc_bus = intel_hdmi_ddc_pin(dev_priv, port);
> > -- 
> > 2.13.6
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:22:44AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:59AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Starting on GLK we support HDMI 2.0. So this patch only
> > > extend the work Shashank has made to GLK to CNL.
> > > 
> > > v2: The version that compiles :/
> > > 
> > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 7 ++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > > index 2d95db64cdf2..96c314a6170a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > > @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ static int intel_hdmi_source_max_tmds_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > >  		&dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[encoder->port];
> > >  	int max_tmds_clock;
> > >  
> > > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > > +	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > 
> > Cay you reorder this to 'GEN >= 10 || IS_GLK' ? (+ maybe the others to
> > match).
> 
> Sure. I fully agree with this logic.
> 
> Would you be ok with Shashank request on
> #define HAS_HDMI2_SUPPORT INTEL_GEN >= 10 || IS_GLK ?

Maybe in the other places, but not here. These are just platform
specific clock limits, so we should refer to the platforms by their
names here.

> 
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
> 
> > 
> > I'd like to keep this in neat order from new to old, to
> > make it easier to read.
> > 
> > With that 
> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > >  		max_tmds_clock = 594000;
> > >  	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> > >  		max_tmds_clock = 300000;
> > > @@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ bool intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > >  
> > >  	pipe_config->lane_count = 4;
> > >  
> > > -	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > +	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) ||
> > > +					   INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)) {
> > >  		if (scdc->scrambling.low_rates)
> > >  			pipe_config->hdmi_scrambling = true;
> > >  
> > > @@ -2033,7 +2034,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> > >  	connector->doublescan_allowed = 0;
> > >  	connector->stereo_allowed = 1;
> > >  
> > > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > > +	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > >  		connector->ycbcr_420_allowed = true;

Actually even here HAS_HDMI2_SUPPORT would be confusing. We're
specifically interested in 4:2:0 support, which isn't quite the
same thing as HDMI 2.0 support.

So we're left with just the intel_hdmi_compute_config() case. And
I'm not convinced hiding the platform names behind a macro there
would really help anyone.

> > >  
> > >  	intel_hdmi->ddc_bus = intel_hdmi_ddc_pin(dev_priv, port);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.13.6
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > 
> > -- 
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel OTC

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 06:31:57PM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:22:44AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:47:59AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > Starting on GLK we support HDMI 2.0. So this patch only
> > > > extend the work Shashank has made to GLK to CNL.
> > > > 
> > > > v2: The version that compiles :/
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 7 ++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > > > index 2d95db64cdf2..96c314a6170a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> > > > @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ static int intel_hdmi_source_max_tmds_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> > > >  		&dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[encoder->port];
> > > >  	int max_tmds_clock;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > > > +	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > > 
> > > Cay you reorder this to 'GEN >= 10 || IS_GLK' ? (+ maybe the others to
> > > match).
> > 
> > Sure. I fully agree with this logic.
> > 
> > Would you be ok with Shashank request on
> > #define HAS_HDMI2_SUPPORT INTEL_GEN >= 10 || IS_GLK ?
> 
> Maybe in the other places, but not here. These are just platform
> specific clock limits, so we should refer to the platforms by their
> names here.

makes sense... so for now I wont create that only for 2 places...
if we see the need on the future we can change that...

Thanks

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rodrigo.
> > 
> > > 
> > > I'd like to keep this in neat order from new to old, to
> > > make it easier to read.
> > > 
> > > With that 
> > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > >  		max_tmds_clock = 594000;
> > > >  	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> > > >  		max_tmds_clock = 300000;
> > > > @@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ bool intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > > >  
> > > >  	pipe_config->lane_count = 4;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > > +	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) ||
> > > > +					   INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)) {
> > > >  		if (scdc->scrambling.low_rates)
> > > >  			pipe_config->hdmi_scrambling = true;
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -2033,7 +2034,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> > > >  	connector->doublescan_allowed = 0;
> > > >  	connector->stereo_allowed = 1;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > > > +	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > > >  		connector->ycbcr_420_allowed = true;
> 
> Actually even here HAS_HDMI2_SUPPORT would be confusing. We're
> specifically interested in 4:2:0 support, which isn't quite the
> same thing as HDMI 2.0 support.
> 
> So we're left with just the intel_hdmi_compute_config() case. And
> I'm not convinced hiding the platform names behind a macro there
> would really help anyone.
> 
> > > >  
> > > >  	intel_hdmi->ddc_bus = intel_hdmi_ddc_pin(dev_priv, port);
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.13.6
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel OTC
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Starting on GLK we support HDMI 2.0. So this patch only
extend the work Shashank has made to GLK to CNL.

v2: The version that compiles :/
v3: Invert order to newer || older platforms check. (Ville).

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
index 2d95db64cdf2..9d5e72728475 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
@@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ static int intel_hdmi_source_max_tmds_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
 		&dev_priv->vbt.ddi_port_info[encoder->port];
 	int max_tmds_clock;
 
-	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
 		max_tmds_clock = 594000;
 	else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
 		max_tmds_clock = 300000;
@@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ bool intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 
 	pipe_config->lane_count = 4;
 
-	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
+	if (scdc->scrambling.supported && (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 ||
+					   IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))) {
 		if (scdc->scrambling.low_rates)
 			pipe_config->hdmi_scrambling = true;
 
@@ -2033,7 +2034,7 @@ void intel_hdmi_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
 	connector->doublescan_allowed = 0;
 	connector->stereo_allowed = 1;
 
-	if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
 		connector->ycbcr_420_allowed = true;
 
 	intel_hdmi->ddc_bus = intel_hdmi_ddc_pin(dev_priv, port);
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33823/
State : failure

== Summary ==

Series 33823v1 WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/33823/revisions/1/mbox/

Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
                pass       -> FAIL       (fi-blb-e6850)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
                pass       -> INCOMPLETE (fi-snb-2520m)

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:440s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:455s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:65  time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:544s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:276s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:502s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:506s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:507s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:497s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:432s
fi-gdg-551       total:289  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:109 time:263s
fi-glk-1         total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:544s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:430s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:435s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:61  time:425s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:485s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:463s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:485s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:529s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:471s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:529s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:66  time:568s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:452s
fi-skl-6600u     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:541s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:566s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:517s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:494s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:459s
fi-snb-2520m     total:245  pass:211  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:33 
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:425s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:254  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32  time:522s
fi-cnl-y         total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:27  time:571s
fi-glk-dsi       total:289  pass:257  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:2   skip:30  time:510s

c46476e24d6432b5792ef63596a985848d122d50 drm-tip: 2017y-11m-14d-17h-03m-32s UTC integration manifest
6dfe31a79aca drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.
4f1e96fbf6cc drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.
67cfd7f598c5 drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.
5ebe12a24b29 drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.
303af54b1923 drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.
03436c82428a drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.
0e0c097b31c7 drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7129/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev2)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33823/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 33823v2 WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/33823/revisions/2/mbox/

Test chamelium:
        Subgroup dp-crc-fast:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102514
Test kms_busy:
        Subgroup basic-flip-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-after-cursor-atomic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-after-cursor-varying-size:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-before-cursor-varying-size:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup basic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r) fdo#102332
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test pm_rpm:
        Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-rte:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test prime_vgem:
        Subgroup basic-fence-flip:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)

fdo#102514 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102514
fdo#102332 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102332

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:444s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:462s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:379s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:542s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:275s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:505s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:509s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:498s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:495s
WARNING: Long output truncated

5f7fd97a513ac1f0b84c61fae3fc83d4432e602c drm-tip: 2017y-11m-14d-21h-04m-27s UTC integration manifest
94f2ba88d3fc drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.
e1ed8641aef8 drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.
85c74e286241 drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.
3a2b63d54558 drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.
e45282f23fc4 drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.
a66dcfc4e889 drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.
8e5c84fc60c1 drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7134/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev3)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33823/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 33823v3 WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/33823/revisions/3/mbox/

Test chamelium:
        Subgroup dp-crc-fast:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102514
Test kms_busy:
        Subgroup basic-flip-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_cursor_legacy:
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-after-cursor-atomic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-after-cursor-legacy:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-after-cursor-varying-size:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-before-cursor-legacy:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-before-cursor-varying-size:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup basic:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
        Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r) fdo#102332
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup read-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test pm_rpm:
        Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
        Subgroup basic-rte:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)
Test prime_vgem:
        Subgroup basic-fence-flip:
                skip       -> PASS       (fi-hsw-4770r)

fdo#102514 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102514
fdo#102332 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102332

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:438s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:453s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:381s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:540s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:274s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:502s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:504s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:494s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:492s
WARNING: Long output truncated

5f7fd97a513ac1f0b84c61fae3fc83d4432e602c drm-tip: 2017y-11m-14d-21h-04m-27s UTC integration manifest
71d63dabce03 drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.
e92fc1d84a33 drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.
273b1c316fd3 drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.
19da69173ecc drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.
7df18769b1e0 drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.
a8bd63dc30f1 drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.
87b2a9f0a43b drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7135/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev3)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33823/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Test kms_cursor_legacy:
        Subgroup cursora-vs-flipa-legacy:
                pass       -> SKIP       (shard-hsw)
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu:
                pass       -> SKIP       (shard-hsw)
Test kms_setmode:
        Subgroup basic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#99912
Test drv_module_reload:
        Subgroup basic-reload-inject:
                dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102707
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup vblank-vs-dpms-suspend:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
Test kms_draw_crc:
        Subgroup draw-method-xrgb2101010-mmap-gtt-untiled:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
        Subgroup draw-method-rgb565-blt-xtiled:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
Test kms_cursor_crc:
        Subgroup cursor-128x42-random:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
Test kms_busy:
        Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-a:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw) fdo#102249
Test kms_universal_plane:
        Subgroup universal-plane-pipe-a-sanity:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
Test kms_chv_cursor_fail:
        Subgroup pipe-c-128x128-left-edge:
                skip       -> PASS       (shard-hsw)
Test perf:
        Subgroup oa-exponents:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102254

fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
fdo#102707 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102707
fdo#102249 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102249
fdo#102254 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102254

shard-hsw        total:2584 pass:1469 dwarn:3   dfail:1   fail:10  skip:1101 time:9445s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl        total:2584 pass:1619 dwarn:3   dfail:1   fail:24  skip:936 time:13075s
shard-kbl        total:2565 pass:1703 dwarn:7   dfail:0   fail:25  skip:829 time:10603s
shard-snb        total:2567 pass:1184 dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:12  skip:1369 time:7569s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7135/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev4)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev4)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33823/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 33823v4 WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/33823/revisions/4/mbox/

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:448s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:383s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:535s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:277s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:512s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:511s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:500s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:496s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:433s
fi-gdg-551       total:289  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:109 time:266s
fi-glk-1         total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:543s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:429s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:436s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:61  time:427s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:473s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:466s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:487s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:532s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:476s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:533s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:66  time:577s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:461s
fi-skl-6600u     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:543s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:569s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:512s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:495s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:465s
fi-snb-2520m     total:246  pass:212  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:33 
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:423s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cnl-y         total:216  pass:195  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20 

1fc4fe8ac97eee86a4fe2dc1239a350aa3f13371 drm-tip: 2017y-11m-16d-12h-57m-10s UTC integration manifest
7484ce150d2c drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.
c8b6992b7f7c drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.
7ee6c6f3682a drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.
7591bc02cd94 drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.
890b9013c560 drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.
fb457f5b2b19 drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.
874fa2bcab3b drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7160/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev4)

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake. (rev4)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33823/
State : success

== Summary ==

Test drv_selftest:
        Subgroup mock_sanitycheck:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-snb) fdo#103717
Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
        Subgroup fbc-1p-offscren-pri-shrfb-draw-render:
                fail       -> PASS       (shard-snb) fdo#101623 +1
Test kms_flip:
        Subgroup vblank-vs-suspend-interruptible:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (shard-snb) fdo#100368

fdo#103717 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103717
fdo#101623 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368

shard-hsw        total:2584 pass:1473 dwarn:1   dfail:1   fail:10  skip:1099 time:9532s
shard-snb        total:2584 pass:1258 dwarn:3   dfail:1   fail:11  skip:1311 time:8012s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl        total:2565 pass:1598 dwarn:2   dfail:1   fail:26  skip:937 time:12996s
shard-kbl        total:2526 pass:1673 dwarn:10  dfail:4   fail:23  skip:813 time:10125s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7160/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH 0/7] WRPLL fixes for HDMI 2.0 on Cannonlake.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

Merged to dinq. Thanks for all reviews and comments.

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 07:47:52PM +0000, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> With these fixes and clean-ups around wrpll plus
> extending HDMI 2.0 from GLK to CNL we could finally
> get a functional HDMI 2.0 display with 4k60Hz.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
> 
> Rodrigo Vivi (7):
>   drm/i915/cnl: Remove spurious central_freq.
>   drm/i915/cnl: Remove useless conversion.
>   drm/i915/cnl: Fix, simplify and unify wrpll variable sizes.
>   drm/i915/cnl: Fix wrpll math for higher freqs.
>   drm/i915/cnl: Don't blindly replace qdiv.
>   drm/i915/cnl: Write dco_fraction calculation as spec.
>   drm/i915/cnl: Extend HDMI 2.0 support to CNL.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 42 ++++++++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c     |  7 +++---
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

[Rodrigo Vivi]

I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
it in the future.

v2: Don't follow the spec since that gives invalid
    values and it is also confusing. This Ville's
    version is much simpler.
v3: Use u64 cast instead of declaring a u64 dco. (Ville).

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 361b7102b602..51c5ae4e9116 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2153,6 +2153,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
 				      u32 dco_freq, u32 ref_freq,
 				      int pdiv, int qdiv, int kdiv)
 {
+	u32 dco;
+
 	switch (kdiv) {
 	case 1:
 		params->kdiv = 1;
@@ -2189,9 +2191,10 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
 	params->qdiv_ratio = qdiv;
 	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
 
-	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
-	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
-					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
+	dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq);
+
+	params->dco_integer = dco >> 15;
+	params->dco_fraction = dco & 0x7fff;
 }
 
 static bool
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:42:57AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
> so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
> it in the future.
> 
> v2: Don't follow the spec since that gives invalid
>     values and it is also confusing. This Ville's
>     version is much simpler.
> v3: Use u64 cast instead of declaring a u64 dco. (Ville).
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 361b7102b602..51c5ae4e9116 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -2153,6 +2153,8 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
>  				      u32 dco_freq, u32 ref_freq,
>  				      int pdiv, int qdiv, int kdiv)
>  {
> +	u32 dco;
> +
>  	switch (kdiv) {
>  	case 1:
>  		params->kdiv = 1;
> @@ -2189,9 +2191,10 @@ static void cnl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
>  	params->qdiv_ratio = qdiv;
>  	params->qdiv_mode = (qdiv == 1) ? 0 : 1;
>  
> -	params->dco_integer = div_u64(dco_freq, ref_freq);
> -	params->dco_fraction = div_u64((div_u64((uint64_t)dco_freq<<15, (uint64_t)ref_freq) -
> -					((uint64_t)params->dco_integer<<15)) * 0x8000, 0x8000);
> +	dco = div_u64((u64)dco_freq << 15, ref_freq);
> +
> +	params->dco_integer = dco >> 15;
> +	params->dco_fraction = dco & 0x7fff;
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> -- 
> 2.13.6

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33898/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 33898v1 drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/33898/revisions/1/mbox/

Test gem_exec_reloc:
        Subgroup basic-gtt-active:
                fail       -> PASS       (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102582 +1
Test gem_ringfill:
        Subgroup basic-default-hang:
                pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-pnv-d510) fdo#101600

fdo#102582 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
fdo#101600 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101600

fi-bdw-5557u     total:289  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:21  time:447s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:454s
fi-blb-e6850     total:289  pass:223  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:65  time:384s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:289  pass:243  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:46  time:544s
fi-bwr-2160      total:289  pass:183  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:106 time:277s
fi-bxt-dsi       total:289  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:30  time:507s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:509s
fi-byt-j1900     total:289  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:35  time:499s
fi-byt-n2820     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:491s
fi-elk-e7500     total:289  pass:229  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:60  time:430s
fi-gdg-551       total:289  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:1   skip:109 time:267s
fi-glk-1         total:289  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time:540s
fi-hsw-4770      total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:434s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:439s
fi-ilk-650       total:289  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:61  time:425s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:488s
fi-ivb-3770      total:289  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time:466s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:289  pass:264  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:485s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:289  pass:270  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time:528s
fi-kbl-7567u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:480s
fi-kbl-r         total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:532s
fi-pnv-d510      total:289  pass:222  dwarn:1   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:66  time:575s
fi-skl-6260u     total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:455s
fi-skl-6600u     total:289  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:27  time:546s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:289  pass:263  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:26  time:569s
fi-skl-6700k     total:289  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time:526s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:289  pass:269  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time:499s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:289  pass:266  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:23  time:457s
fi-snb-2520m     total:289  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:39  time:559s
fi-snb-2600      total:289  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:40  time:422s
Blacklisted hosts:
fi-cfl-s         total:289  pass:254  dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:32  time:531s

bd5e410d0f036c80ae80e075592ee6dd90c660a8 drm-tip: 2017y-11m-15d-17h-22m-19s UTC integration manifest
edf919f1cce4 drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7150/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning for drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/cnl: Simplify dco_fraction calculation.
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33898/
State : warning

== Summary ==

Test kms_busy:
        Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-a:
                dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#102249
Test kms_cursor_crc:
        Subgroup cursor-64x64-suspend:
                pass       -> SKIP       (shard-hsw)
Test drv_selftest:
        Subgroup mock_sanitycheck:
                dmesg-warn -> PASS       (shard-hsw) fdo#103719
Test kms_setmode:
        Subgroup basic:
                pass       -> FAIL       (shard-hsw) fdo#99912

fdo#102249 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102249
fdo#103719 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103719
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912

shard-hsw        total:2584 pass:1470 dwarn:3   dfail:1   fail:10  skip:1100 time:9493s
Blacklisted hosts:
shard-apl        total:2511 pass:1576 dwarn:2   dfail:2   fail:21  skip:910 time:13074s
shard-kbl        total:2565 pass:1698 dwarn:6   dfail:1   fail:24  skip:835 time:10778s
shard-snb        total:2567 pass:1240 dwarn:3   dfail:0   fail:12  skip:1311 time:7894s

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7150/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx