From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/crt: Silence compiler warning for uninitialised status
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:48:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171115124833.GA10981@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115105036.1094-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:50:36AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> clang is confused by our if-else-chain that abruptly exits before a
> final else:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:821:11: warning: variable 'status' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> else if (ret < 0)
> ^~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:826:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> return status;
> ^~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:821:7: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
> else if (ret < 0)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:761:12: note: initialize the variable 'status' to silence this warning
> int status, ret;
>
> In this case, we can reduce the final else-if clause to an unconditional else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> index 9f31aea51dff..ae55afcbdc2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> @@ -810,10 +810,11 @@ intel_crt_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> else
> status = connector_status_unknown;
> intel_release_load_detect_pipe(connector, &tmp, ctx);
> - } else if (ret == 0)
> + } else if (ret == 0) {
> status = connector_status_unknown;
> - else if (ret < 0)
> + } else {
> status = ret;
> + }
Patch lgtm
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On a somewhat related note, the return value of intel_get_load_detect_pipe()
is quite a mess. It's mixing ints and bools in a way that makes the whole
thing look very confusing. In the end it looks like like -EDEADLK is the
only error we can get here.
>
> out:
> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, intel_encoder->power_domain);
> --
> 2.15.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-15 10:50 Trivial compiler squelching Chris Wilson
2017-11-15 10:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Initialise entry in intel_ppat_get() for older compilers Chris Wilson
2017-11-15 12:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-11-15 13:17 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-11-15 13:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-11-17 13:32 ` Wang, Zhi A
2017-11-20 9:54 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-11-20 10:02 ` Wang, Zhi A
2017-11-15 10:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/: Initialise trans_min for skl_compute_transition_wm() Chris Wilson
2017-11-15 10:54 ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-16 1:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-01-22 19:13 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-19 20:41 ` Chris Wilson
2017-11-15 10:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/crt: Silence compiler warning for uninitialised status Chris Wilson
2017-11-15 12:48 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-11-15 11:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Initialise entry in intel_ppat_get() for older compilers Patchwork
2017-11-15 12:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-11-15 13:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2] drm/i915: Initialise entry in intel_ppat_get() for older compilers (rev2) Patchwork
2017-11-15 14:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171115124833.GA10981@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox