intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Limit link training clock recovery loop
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:22:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720192215.GI16907@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532036858-11743-1-git-send-email-nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 02:47:38PM -0700, Nathan Ciobanu wrote:
> Limit the link training clock recovery loop to 10 attempts at
> LANEx_CR_DONE per DP 1.4 spec section 3.5.1.2.2 and 80 attempts for
> pre-DP 1.4 (4 voltage levels x 4 preemphasis levels x
> x 5 identical voltages tries). Some faulty USB-C MST hubs can
> cause us to get stuck in this loop indefinitely requesting something
> like:
> 
>     voltage swing: 0, pre-emphasis level: 2
>     voltage swing: 1, pre-emphasis level: 2
>     voltage swing: 0, pre-emphasis level: 3
> 
> over and over so max_vswing would never be reached,
> drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok() would never return true and voltage_tries
> would always get reset to 1. The driver sends those values to the hub
> but the hub keeps requesting new values every time.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>     - updated commit message (DK, Manasi)
>     - defined DP_DP14_MAX_CR_TRIES (Marc)
>     - made the loop iterate for max 10 times (Rodrigo, Marc)
> 
> Changes in v3:
>     - changed error message to use DP_DP14_MAX_CR_TRIES
> 
> Changes in v4:
>     - Updated the title to reflect the change
>     - Updated the commit message
>     - Added 80 attempts for pre-DP 1.4 devices
> 
> Changes in v5:
>     - Removed DP_DP14_MAX_CR_TRIES from drm
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index 4da6e33c7fa1..7903de7a54c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	uint8_t voltage;
> -	int voltage_tries, max_vswing_tries;
> +	int voltage_tries, max_vswing_tries, cr_tries, max_cr_tries;
>  	uint8_t link_config[2];
>  	uint8_t link_bw, rate_select;
>  
> @@ -170,9 +170,19 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* DP 1.4 spec clock recovery retries defined but

nip: Preferred kernel multi-line comment is:

/*
 * Start comment..
 * second line..
 */

but yeah, I understand we have many precedent cases using the other style...

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
(better with comment updated ;))

> +	 * for devices pre-DP 1.4 we set the retry limit
> +	 * to 4 (voltage levels) x 4 (preemphasis levels) x
> +	 * x 5 (same voltage retries) = 80 (max iterations)
> +	 */
> +	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_14)
> +		max_cr_tries = 10;
> +	else
> +		max_cr_tries = 80;
> +
>  	voltage_tries = 1;
>  	max_vswing_tries = 0;
> -	for (;;) {
> +	for (cr_tries = 0; cr_tries < max_cr_tries; ++cr_tries) {
>  		uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
>  
>  		drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay(intel_dp->dpcd);
> @@ -216,6 +226,8 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  			++max_vswing_tries;
>  
>  	}
> +	DRM_ERROR("Failed clock recovery %d times, giving up!\n", max_cr_tries);
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-20 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-19 21:47 [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Limit link training clock recovery loop Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-20 19:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-07-20 20:17   ` Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-20 20:15 ` [PATCH v6] " Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-20 20:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-07-20 20:41     ` Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-23 22:30   ` Marc Herbert
2018-07-23 23:05   ` Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180720192215.GI16907@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=marc.herbert@intel.com \
    --cc=nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).