From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>,
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Limit link training clock recovery loop
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:22:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720192215.GI16907@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532036858-11743-1-git-send-email-nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 02:47:38PM -0700, Nathan Ciobanu wrote:
> Limit the link training clock recovery loop to 10 attempts at
> LANEx_CR_DONE per DP 1.4 spec section 3.5.1.2.2 and 80 attempts for
> pre-DP 1.4 (4 voltage levels x 4 preemphasis levels x
> x 5 identical voltages tries). Some faulty USB-C MST hubs can
> cause us to get stuck in this loop indefinitely requesting something
> like:
>
> voltage swing: 0, pre-emphasis level: 2
> voltage swing: 1, pre-emphasis level: 2
> voltage swing: 0, pre-emphasis level: 3
>
> over and over so max_vswing would never be reached,
> drm_dp_clock_recovery_ok() would never return true and voltage_tries
> would always get reset to 1. The driver sends those values to the hub
> but the hub keeps requesting new values every time.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - updated commit message (DK, Manasi)
> - defined DP_DP14_MAX_CR_TRIES (Marc)
> - made the loop iterate for max 10 times (Rodrigo, Marc)
>
> Changes in v3:
> - changed error message to use DP_DP14_MAX_CR_TRIES
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Updated the title to reflect the change
> - Updated the commit message
> - Added 80 attempts for pre-DP 1.4 devices
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Removed DP_DP14_MAX_CR_TRIES from drm
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Marc Herbert <marc.herbert@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index 4da6e33c7fa1..7903de7a54c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> uint8_t voltage;
> - int voltage_tries, max_vswing_tries;
> + int voltage_tries, max_vswing_tries, cr_tries, max_cr_tries;
> uint8_t link_config[2];
> uint8_t link_bw, rate_select;
>
> @@ -170,9 +170,19 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return false;
> }
>
> + /* DP 1.4 spec clock recovery retries defined but
nip: Preferred kernel multi-line comment is:
/*
* Start comment..
* second line..
*/
but yeah, I understand we have many precedent cases using the other style...
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
(better with comment updated ;))
> + * for devices pre-DP 1.4 we set the retry limit
> + * to 4 (voltage levels) x 4 (preemphasis levels) x
> + * x 5 (same voltage retries) = 80 (max iterations)
> + */
> + if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_14)
> + max_cr_tries = 10;
> + else
> + max_cr_tries = 80;
> +
> voltage_tries = 1;
> max_vswing_tries = 0;
> - for (;;) {
> + for (cr_tries = 0; cr_tries < max_cr_tries; ++cr_tries) {
> uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE];
>
> drm_dp_link_train_clock_recovery_delay(intel_dp->dpcd);
> @@ -216,6 +226,8 @@ static bool intel_dp_link_max_vswing_reached(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> ++max_vswing_tries;
>
> }
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed clock recovery %d times, giving up!\n", max_cr_tries);
> + return false;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 21:47 [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915/dp: Limit link training clock recovery loop Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-20 19:22 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-07-20 20:17 ` Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-20 20:15 ` [PATCH v6] " Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-20 20:28 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-07-20 20:41 ` Nathan Ciobanu
2018-07-23 22:30 ` Marc Herbert
2018-07-23 23:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720192215.GI16907@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marc.herbert@intel.com \
--cc=nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).