intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Implement 16GB dimm wa for latency level-0
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:44:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726141410.2185-4-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180726141410.2185-1-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>

Memory with 16GB dimms require an increase of 1us in level-0 latency.
This patch implements the same.
Bspec: 4381

changes since V1:
 - s/memdev_info/dram_info
 - make skl_is_16gb_dimm pure function

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index ddf6bf9b500a..86bc2e685522 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1070,6 +1070,25 @@ static void intel_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	intel_gvt_sanitize_options(dev_priv);
 }
 
+static bool
+skl_is_16gb_dimm(u8 rank, u8 size, u8 width)
+{
+	if (size == 16 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 &&
+	    rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
+		return true;
+	else if (size == 32 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 &&
+		 rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
+		return true;
+	else if (size == 8 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 &&
+		 rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE)
+		return true;
+	else if (size == 16 && width == SKL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 &&
+		 rank == SKL_DRAM_RANK_DUAL)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int
 skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info *ch, u32 val)
 {
@@ -1077,6 +1096,7 @@ skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info *ch, u32 val)
 	u8 l_size, s_size;
 	u8 l_width, s_width;
 	enum dram_rank rank;
+	bool l_16gb_dimm, s_16gb_dimm;
 
 	if (!val)
 		return -1;
@@ -1103,6 +1123,13 @@ skl_dram_get_channel_info(struct dram_channel_info *ch, u32 val)
 	else
 		rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_SINGLE;
 
+	l_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(l_rank, l_size, l_width);
+	s_16gb_dimm = skl_is_16gb_dimm(s_rank, s_size, s_width);
+
+	if (l_16gb_dimm || s_16gb_dimm)
+		ch->is_16gb_dimm = true;
+	else
+		ch->is_16gb_dimm = false;
 	ch->l_info.size = l_size;
 	ch->s_info.size = s_size;
 	ch->l_info.width = l_width;
@@ -1137,6 +1164,8 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	dram_info->valid_dimm = true;
+
 	/*
 	 * If any of the channel is single rank channel, worst case output
 	 * will be same as if single rank memory, so consider single rank
@@ -1152,6 +1181,10 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		DRM_INFO("couldn't get memory rank information\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
+	if (ch0.is_16gb_dimm || ch1.is_16gb_dimm)
+		dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = true;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1263,6 +1296,7 @@ bxt_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	dram_info->valid_dimm = true;
 	dram_info->valid = true;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1275,6 +1309,8 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	int ret;
 
 	dram_info->valid = false;
+	dram_info->valid_dimm = false;
+	dram_info->is_16gb_dimm = false;
 	dram_info->rank = I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID;
 	dram_info->bandwidth_kbps = 0;
 	dram_info->num_channels = 0;
@@ -1298,9 +1334,9 @@ intel_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		sprintf(bandwidth_str, "unknown");
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM bandwidth:%s, total-channels: %u\n",
 		      bandwidth_str, dram_info->num_channels);
-	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank\n",
+	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRAM rank: %s rank 16GB-dimm:%s\n",
 		      (dram_info->rank == I915_DRAM_RANK_DUAL) ?
-		      "dual" : "single");
+		      "dual" : "single", yesno(dram_info->is_16gb_dimm));
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 2d12fc152b49..854f3c828e01 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1906,6 +1906,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
 
 	struct dram_info {
 		bool valid;
+		bool valid_dimm;
+		bool is_16gb_dimm;
 		u8 num_channels;
 		enum dram_rank {
 			I915_DRAM_RANK_INVALID = 0,
@@ -2133,6 +2135,7 @@ struct dram_channel_info {
 		u8 size, width, rank;
 	} l_info, s_info;
 	enum dram_rank rank;
+	bool is_16gb_dimm;
 };
 
 static inline struct drm_i915_private *to_i915(const struct drm_device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 7312ecb73415..2446f53adf21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2874,6 +2874,19 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			}
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * WA Level-0 adjustment for 16GB DIMMs: SKL+
+		 * If we could not get dimm info enable this WA to prevent from
+		 * any underrun. If not able to get Dimm info assume 16GB dimm
+		 * to avoid any underrun.
+		 */
+		if (dev_priv->dram_info.valid_dimm) {
+			if (dev_priv->dram_info.is_16gb_dimm)
+				wm[0] += 1;
+		} else {
+			wm[0] += 1;
+		}
+
 	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
 		uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);
 
-- 
2.16.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-26 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26 14:14 [PATCH 0/5] Decode memdev info and bandwidth and implemnt latency WA Mahesh Kumar
2018-07-26 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/bxt: Decode memory bandwidth and parameters Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-16 22:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-17 17:43   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-21  9:53     ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-08-21 15:12       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-07-26 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/skl+: " Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-16 22:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-21 10:21     ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-07-26 14:14 ` Mahesh Kumar [this message]
2018-07-27  3:51   ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Implement 16GB dimm wa for latency level-0 Matt Turner
2018-07-27  6:10     ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-07-28  5:48       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-07-31 14:18         ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-08-17 17:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-07-26 14:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/kbl+: Enable IPC only for symmetric memory configurations Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-17 18:20   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-21 14:57     ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-08-21 16:00       ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-08-21 18:56         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-08-22 13:02           ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-08-22 15:39             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-07-26 14:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/skl+: don't trust IPC value set by BIOS Mahesh Kumar
2018-07-26 14:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Decode memdev info and bandwidth and implemnt latency WA (rev2) Patchwork
2018-07-26 14:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-07-26 16:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180726141410.2185-4-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
    --to=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).