From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse"
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:03:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816180349.GB5643@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dff444a-c041-ebad-6082-b3f19b2ec20a@fbihome.de>
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 10:53:35AM +0200, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
> This re-applies the workaround for "some DP sinks, [which] are a
> little nuts" from commit 1a36147bb939 ("drm/i915: Perform link
> quality check unconditionally during long pulse").
> It makes the secondary AOC E2460P monitor connected via DP to an
> acer Veriton N4640G usable again.
Would be nice to add in the commit message that this sink sends a
long pulse to indicate link loss, hence check link status during long pulse.
If there is a FDO bug associated with this you could also add the
Bugzilla link before Sign off tag.
But other than that this looks good to me.
Manasi
>
> This hunk was dropped in commit c85d200e8321 ("drm/i915: Move SST
> DP link retraining into the ->post_hotplug() hook")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 8e0e14b..22b2452 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4333,18 +4333,6 @@ intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return !drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, intel_dp->lane_count);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * If display is now connected check links status,
> - * there has been known issues of link loss triggering
> - * long pulse.
> - *
> - * Some sinks (eg. ASUS PB287Q) seem to perform some
> - * weird HPD ping pong during modesets. So we can apparently
> - * end up with HPD going low during a modeset, and then
> - * going back up soon after. And once that happens we must
> - * retrain the link to get a picture. That's in case no
> - * userspace component reacted to intermittent HPD dip.
> - */
> int intel_dp_retrain_link(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> @@ -4923,7 +4911,8 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> }
>
> static int
> -intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *connector,
> + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(&connector->base);
> @@ -4982,6 +4971,22 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *connector)
> */
> status = connector_status_disconnected;
> goto out;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * If display is now connected check links status,
> + * there has been known issues of link loss triggering
> + * long pulse.
> + *
> + * Some sinks (eg. ASUS PB287Q) seem to perform some
> + * weird HPD ping pong during modesets. So we can apparently
> + * end up with HPD going low during a modeset, and then
> + * going back up soon after. And once that happens we must
> + * retrain the link to get a picture. That's in case no
> + * userspace component reacted to intermittent HPD dip.
> + */
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> +
> + intel_dp_retrain_link(encoder, ctx);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5043,7 +5048,7 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - status = intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
> + status = intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector, ctx);
> }
>
> intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-16 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-03 18:10 [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse" Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-04 1:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-08-06 10:25 ` [PATCH] v2 " Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-07 19:33 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-07 22:26 ` Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-07 22:46 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-08 8:53 ` [PATCH] v3 " Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-13 16:35 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-16 18:03 ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2018-08-16 19:12 ` Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-17 11:12 ` Jan-Marek Glogowski
2018-08-17 20:33 ` Lyude Paul
2018-08-04 1:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2018-08-06 16:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse" (rev2) Patchwork
2018-08-06 19:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-08-08 23:17 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Re-apply "Perform link quality check, unconditionally during long pulse" (rev3) Patchwork
2018-08-09 2:39 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180816180349.GB5643@intel.com \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=glogow@fbihome.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).