From: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@gmail.com>
To: "Kumar, Mahesh" <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, seanpaul@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] drm/vkms/crc: Implement verify_crc_source callback
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:25:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821062513.GA28417@haneenDRM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e6b04aa-abc9-fabb-b020-ed8da3a93fd6@intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 09:53:11AM +0530, Kumar, Mahesh wrote:
> Hi Haneen,
>
>
> On 8/21/2018 4:09 AM, Haneen Mohammed wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 08:31:03AM +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
> > > This patch implements "verify_crc_source" callback function for
> > > Virtual KMS drm driver.
> > >
> > > Changes Since V1:
> > > - update values_cnt in verify_crc_source
> > >
> > > Cc: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@gmail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h | 2 ++
> > > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> > > index 37d717f38e3c..b2a484b4e2ad 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> > > @@ -70,6 +70,37 @@ void vkms_crc_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
> > > drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(crtc, true, crtc_state->n_frame, &crc32);
> > > }
> > > +static int vkms_crc_parse_source(const char *src_name, bool *enabled)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (!src_name) {
> > > + *enabled = false;
> > > + } else if (strcmp(src_name, "auto") == 0) {
> > > + *enabled = true;
> > > + } else {
> > > + *enabled = false;
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int vkms_verify_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *src_name,
> > > + size_t *values_cnt)
> > > +{
> > > + bool enabled;
> > > +
> > > + if (vkms_crc_parse_source(src_name, &enabled) < 0) {
> > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("unknown source %s\n", src_name);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + *values_cnt = 1;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int vkms_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *src_name,
> > > size_t *values_cnt)
> > > {
> > > @@ -78,10 +109,9 @@ int vkms_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *src_name,
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > - if (src_name && strcmp(src_name, "auto") == 0)
> > > - enabled = true;
> > > - else if (src_name)
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + ret = vkms_crc_parse_source(src_name, &enabled);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > I think the return value after vkms_crc_parse_source should be called
> > once instead at the end of vkms_set_crc_source otherwise crc_enabled
> > won't be updated?
> Here I'm assuming if src_name is wrong we don't need to proceed further, let
> the CRC generation to continue whatever it was doing (enabled or disabled).
> But anyway that is changing the original design, will remove above return to
> keep the behavior same.
>
> -Mahesh
hm I'm not really sure if my approach was the right way, but if it wasn't
then I think maybe this change would be better if it was either in a separate patch or
here with more details
Thank you,
Haneen
> >
> > - Haneen
> >
> > > *values_cnt = 1;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> > > index bfe6e0312cc4..9d0b1a325a78 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> > > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs vkms_crtc_funcs = {
> > > .enable_vblank = vkms_enable_vblank,
> > > .disable_vblank = vkms_disable_vblank,
> > > .set_crc_source = vkms_set_crc_source,
> > > + .verify_crc_source = vkms_verify_crc_source,
> > > };
> > > static void vkms_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
> > > index f156c930366a..090c5e4f5544 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
> > > @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ void vkms_gem_vunmap(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> > > /* CRC Support */
> > > int vkms_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *src_name,
> > > size_t *values_cnt);
> > > +int vkms_verify_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name,
> > > + size_t *values_cnt);
> > > void vkms_crc_work_handle(struct work_struct *work);
> > > #endif /* _VKMS_DRV_H_ */
> > > --
> > > 2.16.2
> > >
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-13 15:11 [PATCH v5 0/3] Improve crc-core driver interface Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-13 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] drm/vkms/crc: Implement verify_crc_source callback Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-14 3:01 ` [PATCH V2 " Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-20 22:39 ` Haneen Mohammed
2018-08-21 4:23 ` Kumar, Mahesh
2018-08-21 4:34 ` [PATCH V3 " Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-21 6:16 ` Haneen Mohammed
2018-08-21 6:25 ` Haneen Mohammed [this message]
2018-08-13 15:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/crc: Cleanup crtc_crc_open function Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-13 15:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] Revert "drm: crc: Wait for a frame before returning from open()" Mahesh Kumar
2018-08-13 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Improve crc-core driver interface (rev11) Patchwork
2018-08-14 3:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Improve crc-core driver interface (rev12) Patchwork
2018-08-21 4:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Improve crc-core driver interface (rev13) Patchwork
2018-08-21 5:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-08-21 5:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2018-08-21 6:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2018-08-21 6:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180821062513.GA28417@haneenDRM \
--to=hamohammed.sa@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mahesh1.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).