intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: [CI 3/3] drm/i915/psr: Mask PSR irq bits when re-enabling interrupts.
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:11:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180821221156.2442-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821221156.2442-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

gen8_de_irq_postinstall() wasn't masking the IRQ bit before passing the
debug flag to psr_irq_control(). This check was missed when new debug bits
were defined in  'commit c44301fce614 ("drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at
runtime through debugfs, v6")'. Instead of ANDing the irq bit in all the
callers, move it to the callee.

v2: Rebased.

Fixes: c44301fce614 ("drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through
debugfs, v6")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index b2c9838442bc..8084e35b25c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -4048,7 +4048,7 @@ static int ironlake_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) {
 		gen3_assert_iir_is_zero(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_IIR);
-		intel_psr_irq_control(dev_priv, dev_priv->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ);
+		intel_psr_irq_control(dev_priv, dev_priv->psr.debug);
 		display_mask |= DE_EDP_PSR_INT_HSW;
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index cbe6ac445ea2..b226ce59a66b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 			      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
-void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug);
+void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 debug);
 void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir);
 void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
 int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 7980f8120aaa..da583a45e942 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	}
 }
 
-void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug)
+void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 debug)
 {
 	u32 debug_mask, mask;
 
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug)
 			      EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY(TRANSCODER_C);
 	}
 
-	if (debug)
+	if (debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ)
 		mask |= debug_mask;
 
 	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IMR, ~mask);
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ int intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	if (crtc)
 		dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled = intel_psr2_enabled(dev_priv, crtc_state);
 
-	intel_psr_irq_control(dev_priv, dev_priv->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ);
+	intel_psr_irq_control(dev_priv, dev_priv->psr.debug);
 
 	if (dev_priv->psr.prepared && enable)
 		intel_psr_enable_locked(dev_priv, crtc_state);
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 22:11 [CI 1/3] drm/i915/psr: Print PSR_STATUS when PSR idle wait times out Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-08-21 22:11 ` [CI 2/3] drm/i915/psr: Add missing check for I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ bit Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-08-21 22:11 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-08-21 22:39 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915/psr: Print PSR_STATUS when PSR idle wait times out Patchwork
2018-08-21 23:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-08-22  1:54 ` [CI 1/3] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180821221156.2442-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).