[PATCH] drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow

* [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow
@ 2018-09-05  9:53 Jani Nikula
  2018-09-05 10:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow (rev2) Patchwork
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-09-05  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula, Rodrigo Vivi

We've opted to use the maximum link rate and lane count for eDP panels,
because typically the maximum supported configuration reported by the
panel has matched the native resolution requirements of the panel, and
optimizing the link has lead to problems.

With eDP 1.4 rate select method and DSC features, this is decreasingly
the case. There's a need to optimize the link parameters. Moreover,
already eDP 1.3 states fast link with fewer lanes is preferred over the
wide and slow. (Wide and slow should still be more reliable for longer
cable lengths.)

Additionally, there have been reports of panels failing on arbitrary
link configurations, although arguably all configurations they claim to
support should work.

Optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow.

Side note: The implementation has a near duplicate of the link config
function, with just the two inner for loops turned inside out. Perhaps
there'd be a way to make this, say, more table driven to reduce the
duplication, but seems like that would lead to duplication in the table
generation. We'll also have to see how the link config optimization for
DSC turns out.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

---

v2 of http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509071321.28563-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

Untested. It's possible this helps the referenced bug. The downside is
that this patch has a bunch of dependencies that are too much to
backport to stable kernels. If the patch works, we may need to consider
hacking together an uglier backport.
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 436c22de33b6..bf7b91832c8a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1921,6 +1921,42 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	return false;
 }
 
+/* Optimize link config in order: max bpp, min lanes, min clock */
+static bool
+intel_dp_compute_link_config_fast(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+				  struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
+				  const struct link_config_limits *limits)
+{
+	struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->base.adjusted_mode;
+	int bpp, clock, lane_count;
+	int mode_rate, link_clock, link_avail;
+
+	for (bpp = limits->max_bpp; bpp >= limits->min_bpp; bpp -= 2 * 3) {
+		mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
+						   bpp);
+
+		for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
+		     lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
+		     lane_count <<= 1) {
+			for (clock = limits->min_clock; clock <= limits->max_clock; clock++) {
+				link_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
+				link_avail = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_clock,
+								    lane_count);
+
+				if (mode_rate <= link_avail) {
+					pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
+					pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp;
+					pipe_config->port_clock = link_clock;
+
+					return true;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool
 intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 			     struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
@@ -1945,13 +1981,15 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 	limits.min_bpp = 6 * 3;
 	limits.max_bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
 
-	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
+	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && intel_dp->edp_dpcd[0] < DP_EDP_14) {
 		/*
 		 * Use the maximum clock and number of lanes the eDP panel
-		 * advertizes being capable of. The panels are generally
-		 * designed to support only a single clock and lane
-		 * configuration, and typically these values correspond to the
-		 * native resolution of the panel.
+		 * advertizes being capable of. The eDP 1.3 and earlier panels
+		 * are generally designed to support only a single clock and
+		 * lane configuration, and typically these values correspond to
+		 * the native resolution of the panel. With eDP 1.4 rate select
+		 * and DSC, this is decreasingly the case, and we need to be
+		 * able to select less than maximum link config.
 		 */
 		limits.min_lane_count = limits.max_lane_count;
 		limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock;
@@ -1965,12 +2003,25 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 		      intel_dp->common_rates[limits.max_clock],
 		      limits.max_bpp, adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
 
-	/*
-	 * Optimize for slow and wide. This is the place to add alternative
-	 * optimization policy.
-	 */
-	if (!intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(intel_dp, pipe_config, &limits))
-		return false;
+	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
+		/*
+		 * Optimize for fast and narrow. eDP 1.3 section 3.3 and eDP 1.4
+		 * section A.1: "It is recommended that the minimum number of
+		 * lanes be used, using the minimum link rate allowed for that
+		 * lane configuration."
+		 *
+		 * Note that we use the max clock and lane count for eDP 1.3 and
+		 * earlier, and fast vs. wide is irrelevant.
+		 */
+		if (!intel_dp_compute_link_config_fast(intel_dp, pipe_config,
+						       &limits))
+			return false;
+	} else {
+		/* Optimize for slow and wide. */
+		if (!intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(intel_dp, pipe_config,
+						       &limits))
+			return false;
+	}
 
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP lane count %d clock %d bpp %d\n",
 		      pipe_config->lane_count, pipe_config->port_clock,
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread